This paper presents a comprehensive self-assessment of management skills conducted through a survey tool that evaluates ten major competency areas. The author scores lowest in the bottom quartile overall, with particular weakness in self-awareness, stress management, and influence. However, strengths emerge in delegation, empowerment, teamwork, and problem-solving. A comparison between self-ratings and peer assessments reveals important discrepancies: associates rate the author higher in most areas, particularly problem-solving, delegation, and empowerment. The paper concludes that managers must prioritize self-awareness, effective communication, and stress management as foundational competencies for successful leadership in dynamic business environments.
In the modern business world, the role of effective management in organizations is increasingly indispensable. Managers who can organize their resources in new and dynamic ways are regarded as trendsetters. Today's managers cannot simply follow past practices and expect to achieve the same success (Ellis, 2005). Current business changes are more complex, and managers must continuously adjust their skill levels as trends evolve. According to Stettner (2014), every new manager assumes they are better equipped to deal with organizational challenges than their predecessors. However, many do not realize that skills taught in school or outlined in books are not easily converted to daily organizational action.
Every day brings new workplace challenges, and managers require strong competencies to make informed decisions, communicate effectively with others, and assess overall enterprise performance. A 360-degree feedback survey and self-assessment exercise was recently conducted to evaluate managerial readiness across multiple competency dimensions. This paper summarizes the findings and analyzes how the results rate management skills across key leadership areas.
Based on the assessment norms, the results reveal several important patterns. The self-evaluation shows strong ability to solve problems creatively, approaching both routine and complex challenges with careful analysis of available alternatives. The assessment also indicates effective delegation and empowerment of others, strong teamwork skills, and the capacity to incorporate team member opinions in decision-making while leveraging diverse talents effectively.
However, performance ranges average in supportive communication, conflict management, and motivation. Notably lower scores appear in displaying optimism, sharing positive energy, acquiring power, exercising influence, and stress management. The lowest-scoring area is self-awareness. With an overall score below 368, the assessment placed the respondent in the bottom quartile. This result was particularly surprising given the previous assumption of high self-confidence and awareness of personal strengths and weaknesses. The low self-awareness score suggests that self-evaluation is necessary to understand readiness for different and unexpected situations.
The assessment revealed particular strength in empowering others and delegating duties. This is encouraging because, according to Ellis (2005), once an individual assumes a management position, their performance is not measured by individual contribution but rather by their effectiveness in mobilizing the efforts of others toward success. The high score in problem-solving is also significant, as this skill is essential for managing others, since numerous operational scenarios require problems to be resolved for business continuity.
These two competencies form a strong foundation for leadership capability. The ability to delegate effectively while solving complex problems demonstrates that the manager can balance strategic oversight with hands-on problem-resolution—a critical balance in dynamic business environments.
Two critical areas for development emerge from the assessment: stress management and self-confidence combined with self-awareness. Building self-awareness through honest evaluation of personal strengths and weaknesses is essential for increasing overall confidence. Additionally, learning to manage stressful situations effectively is vital, as stress can negatively affect performance, social interactions, and may even lead to stress-related illness.
Comparing self-assessment scores with peer evaluations provides valuable external validation. Associates ranked the respondent's skills in problem-solving, teamwork, empowerment, and delegation as high. They rated conflict resolution and leading positive change as average. Significantly, the same areas where the self-assessment scored lowest—stress management, power, influence, and self-awareness—were also identified as weakest by associates. This consensus emphasizes the need to develop stress management approaches and learn how experienced managers command authority and influence others.
The most striking finding is that associates consistently scored the respondent higher than the self-assessment in most competencies. The greatest variances appeared in problem-solving (associate score 51 vs. self-score 34), team building and empowerment (42 vs. 32), and delegation (37 vs. 31). Stettner (2014) explains that managers are not perfect; they simply need to seek others' opinions in areas of difficulty while remaining objective. This discrepancy in scores suggests that the way the respondent carries themselves and makes decisions creates stronger confidence in their abilities among colleagues than the respondent holds about themselves.
"Leadership requires self-awareness, communication, and stress management"
You’re 78% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.