Management Theory Applied to Military Organizations
This paper examines modern management theory and its application to military organizations through three interconnected sections. First, it outlines ten principles of effective and ethical management — including Ubuntu, systems thinking, holographic design, and visionary leadership — drawn largely from Morgan's (2006) framework. Second, it analyzes the military as a mechanistic organization and considers how learning-organization principles such as supportive management and improved work-life balance could address problems like turnover and mental health. Finally, the paper applies Freudian psychoanalytic theory and Plato's allegory of the cave to the military, exploring how unconscious dynamics, psychic prisons, and repressed instincts shape organizational culture and managerial behavior.
- Ten Principles of Effective and Ethical Management: Ten management principles for ethical, effective organizations
- The Military as a Mechanistic Organization: Military as a classic mechanistic management model
- Toward a Learning Organization in the Military: Applying learning-organization principles to improve military management
- Plato's Psychic Prison and the Military: Plato's cave metaphor applied to military groupthink
- Freudian Analysis of Military Organizational Culture: Freudian unconscious dynamics shaping military behavior
- Conclusion: Creative and Destructive Forces in the Military: Balancing life-preserving and destructive forces in military culture
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper integrates multiple theoretical frameworks — classical management, systems thinking, psychoanalytic theory, and Platonic philosophy — and connects each coherently to a single organizational case (the military).
- It moves logically from prescriptive principles to organizational analysis to deeper philosophical interpretation, giving the argument a clear three-part architecture that builds in complexity.
- The use of Freudian concepts such as the thanatos/eros tension and the psychic prison metaphor from Plato demonstrates an ability to apply abstract theoretical lenses to concrete institutional problems.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied theoretical analysis: the student takes abstract management and psychological theories and systematically maps them onto a real-world institutional context. Rather than merely describing theories, the paper evaluates where they fit, where they fall short, and what changes they suggest — showing critical synthesis rather than simple summary.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized into three named parts. Part One lists and explains ten management principles. Part Two applies classical and learning-organization theory to the military. Part Three applies Freudian and Platonic frameworks to military culture and psychology. Each section uses topic sentences and in-text citations to anchor claims, with a references list following APA format.
Ten Principles of Effective and Ethical Management
As we shift into a new era of management, the outmoded theories rooted in classical and scientific management apply only to specific organizations in specific situations. Newly emerging theories of management take into account not only diversity issues but also issues related to workplace satisfaction, which in turn reduces employee turnover and can therefore improve overall performance. Management theories now need to promote learning organizations and a managerial culture that is both supportive and ethical. Morgan (2006) highlights the role of the learning organization, referring also to the ways organizations can be viewed as cultures with norms and values all their own. Based on Morgan's (2006) analyses, a theoretical approach to management that is both effective and ethical takes into account the following ten points.
Ubuntu and Respect for Others: Senge (2014) discusses the Zulu concept of "Ubuntu" and how it applies to modern management theory and practice. Ubuntu can be defined loosely as respect or acknowledgement of others. Simple forms of nonverbal communication such as eye contact and smiling can enhance the workplace environment in tangible ways, thereby increasing employee workplace satisfaction, reducing absenteeism, reducing turnover, and increasing worker participation in dialogue. Moreover, Ubuntu can be viewed as a means of stimulating an ethical workplace environment in which all persons are respected.
Systems Thinking: Systems thinking prevents narrow-mindedness and calls attention to "big picture" issues (Senge, 2014). Using systems thinking, members of the organization make decisions based on the natural flow of communication and other organic ways an organization operates, rather than on mechanistic models that do not accurately reflect reality.
Holographic Design: A holographic design of an organization promotes learning because it reveals points of interdependency and potent points of relationship (Morgan, 2006). Holographic designs encourage organizations to respond to problems effectively and intelligently.
Conflict Management: A learning organization capitalizes on conflict, using skillful techniques of conflict management including the acknowledgement of diversity in the organizational culture.
Supportive Management: Dupre and Day (2007) note that supportive management techniques promote employee satisfaction and improve employee performance. Supportive management may include allowances for workers to develop a strong work-life balance.
Reducing Perceived Threats: Holbrook, Sousa, and Hahn-Holbrook (2011) show that people are prone to vehement defenses of their worldviews — however skewed those worldviews may be — when threats are perceived. To encourage a collaborative work environment, threats should be minimized and dialogue encouraged instead.
Role Clarity: Role clarity is critical to the success of an organization and its leaders.
Visionary Leadership: When leadership in the organization remains visionary, managers and supervisors are encouraged to share in the collective vision and to impart that vision to all employees.
Appropriate Matching of Culture to Goals: Organizational goals need to align with the structure and culture of the organization. Some organizations may need a more mechanistic model — such as the military — whereas others need a looser and more organic one.
Vigilance: By remaining vigilant to performance measures, employee feedback, and subtle changes in organizational culture, leaders can detect the seeds of problems before they erupt into crises.
The Military as a Mechanistic Organization
The military is a classic mechanistic organization. Military organizations demonstrate the cornerstones of mechanistic management principles, including systematic training, machine-like operations and task management, strong "distinctions between advisory and command functions," decentralized controls but strong autonomous group goals, and most importantly "precisely defined lines of command or communication" (Morgan, 2006, pp. 17–18). As a mechanistic organization, the military can run like a well-oiled machine — its points of weakness repaired instantly and its functions determined with precision and clarity. Members of the military perform their duties with a rigid precision and certainty expected of machine parts. The benefits of the mechanistic model in military operations include discipline and predictability; the military must remain focused, consistent, and committed to law, order, and obedience throughout its operations. Turnover, absenteeism, and discontent can be problems with grave consequences in this context.
Classical management theory can be most readily applied to the military, which is characterized by its organizational hierarchies. Those hierarchies are embedded in military culture and are defined by "precisely defined lines of command or communication," in which the chain of command takes precedence (Morgan, 2006, p. 18). Moreover, the military exhibits "precisely defined points of resistance or rigidity" in order to identify and address conflict (Morgan, 2006, p. 18). While these classical management principles continue to operate in military culture, a highly trained military organization may be one that emphasizes intelligence and dialogue in some of its most important departments. In the future, non-combat military roles might be characterized less and less by classical and mechanistic management and more and more by the features of learning organizations.
Conclusion: Creative and Destructive Forces in the Military
Creative and destructive forces coincide in all organizations. In the military, rigid patterns and rules define the organizational culture. With a fear of death but a simultaneous use of death as a form of power, the military carefully balances commitment to life and willingness to destroy. The result could be acute anxiety felt collectively on the part of the entire organization and individually by its members.
References
Dupre, K. E., & Day, A. L. (2007). The effects of supportive management and job quality on the turnover intentions and health of military personnel. Human Resource Management, 46(2), 185–201.
Figler, R., & Hanlon, S. (2008). Management development and the unconscious from an analytical psychology framework. Journal of Management Development, 27(6), 613–630.
Holbrook, C., Sousa, P., & Hahn-Holbrook, J. (2011). Unconscious vigilance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1037/a0024033
Morgan, B. (2006). Images of organization. Sage.
Sahlins, M. (2009). The conflicts of the faculty. Critical Inquiry, 35(4), 997–1017.
Senge, P. M. (2014). The fifth discipline fieldbook. Crown Publishing.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.