Personal Reflection on Managing Resistance to Change
This paper presents a personal reflection on managing employee resistance to a shift pattern change in the workplace. The author, serving as a manager, recounts how a memo announcing staggered start times triggered immediate resistance among staff. The reflection explores the nature and forms of that resistance, the manager's initial emotional response, and the reasoning behind taking proactive action. Drawing on empathy and an understanding of employees' legitimate personal concerns — including childcare, school commitments, and family events — the paper illustrates how even minor organizational changes can generate significant disruption and why thoughtful management intervention is essential to facilitating successful change.
- Introduction: The Context of Change: Workplace shift pattern change prompts employee resistance
- Becoming Aware of Resistance: Memo announcement triggers immediate visible discontent
- Forms the Resistance Took: Grumbling, reduced productivity, talk of refusal
- Initial Thoughts and Emotional Response: Manager feels empathy, frustration, and personal impact
- Deciding to Take Action: Valid employee concerns motivate managerial intervention
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper uses a concrete, relatable workplace scenario — a shift pattern change — to ground abstract change management concepts in lived experience, making the argument accessible and credible.
- The reflective format is well-suited to the subject: the author openly acknowledges their own emotional response alongside their managerial obligations, which adds authenticity and depth.
- Specific employee examples (a child's birthday party, a parents' evening, evening classes) are used to humanize resistance and illustrate why empathetic management matters.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates reflective practice as an academic method — analyzing a personal professional experience through structured questions to draw out lessons about organizational behavior. This technique, common in management and nursing education, requires the writer to balance personal voice with reference to academic concepts (e.g., Buchanan & Huczynski, 2010), showing how theory applies to real situations.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized around a series of guiding reflective questions, each forming a distinct section: the context of the change, awareness of resistance, the forms resistance took, the author's emotional reaction, and the decision to intervene. This Q&A scaffold gives the reflection clear forward momentum and ensures each analytical dimension is addressed in turn. The conclusion (deciding to act) is left open-ended, hinting at further intervention not fully described — a limitation of the source material that also reflects a genuine mid-process reflection.
Introduction: The Context of Change
Change in any organization can be challenging, especially when employees resist it. Effective management can help change be accepted and embraced, increasing the potential for success (Buchanan & Huczynski, 2010). Many cases regarding change focus on major disruptions, but even small changes can unsettle employees and provoke resistance. In the case discussed in this paper, the change was relatively simple: a shift pattern adjustment at a workplace. The employer wanted to increase coverage by existing employees through staggered start times. Some employees would start up to two hours earlier and finish earlier; others would start later and finish later. The system was designed on a rota basis, with sufficient flexibility built in for employees with special circumstances. As a manager, addressing the resistance this change generated became an immediate priority.
Change management theory recognizes that even incremental organizational changes can trigger significant emotional and behavioral responses from staff, particularly when communication around the change is inadequate or poorly timed.
Becoming Aware of Resistance
The announcement was made through a memo circulated to all staff, outlining the new system that would be introduced in four weeks' time. Resistance was apparent almost immediately. As employees read the memo, there were verbal grumblings; team members asked each other what they thought of the change, with noticeably unhappy expressions. Resistance was also evident during informal conversations at break times, as employees not only expressed their displeasure but also raised concerns about family and social arrangements that might be affected by the new shift times.
Forms the Resistance Took
Initially, the resistance took the form of informal grumbling and conversation. As the day progressed, it became clear that employees were less motivated, and this resistance began to show in declining productivity levels. Later in the day, conversations were overheard about possible collective action, including speculation about whether employees could simply refuse to work the new shifts. It is likely that, had the steps described below not been taken, the resistance could have escalated into a more serious and damaging form.
This pattern is consistent with what organizational behavior research identifies as a typical progression of resistance — beginning with informal dissent and, if unaddressed, moving toward more disruptive collective action.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.