This short essay argues that feminism — defined as the radical notion that women are people — is a cause men can and should embrace. The paper surveys several key inequalities facing women in the United States and worldwide: the persistent gender pay gap, the glass ceiling blocking women from top positions in business and government, the relatively recent achievement of women's suffrage, and ongoing debates over marriage customs and reproductive rights. By grounding feminism in concrete policy realities rather than cultural stereotypes, the essay makes the case that any person who believes in fair treatment for women can legitimately identify as a feminist.
The paper effectively uses definition as an argumentative strategy. By repeatedly returning to the phrase "the radical notion that women are people," the writer reframes feminism away from cultural caricature and toward a minimal, defensible core claim. This technique — defining a contested term on the author's own terms before engaging evidence — is a useful move in persuasive writing.
The essay opens by establishing what feminism means and why men can embrace it, then moves through specific inequalities (pay, political representation) before closing with a broader catalog of issues including suffrage, marriage customs, and reproductive rights. Each paragraph builds on the previous one, widening the scope of the argument toward a concise restatement of the thesis in the final sentences.
Males can be feminists too, because feminism is the radical notion that women are people. This popular feminist slogan suggests that feminism is not about fist-thumping radical politics or women who refuse to wear bras. Rather, feminism means putting an end to the ridiculous practices and conditions that plague women all around the world. Any man who believes that women should be treated fairly in any and all situations can proudly call himself a feminist.
Being treated fairly means, first and foremost, receiving equal pay for equal work. Women still receive lower wages for equal work in the United States. According to the Census Bureau, "For every dollar a man made in 2003, women made 75.5 cents" (Hagenbaugh). Moreover, men can embrace feminism because of the wider implications of the feminist movement — for instance, feminism has been linked to other movements for social justice, such as the civil rights movement for minority members of the population.
Fairness also entails the elimination of the glass ceiling in business and politics. As one observer notes, "a glass ceiling continues to halt the progress of many women who strive to reach top management positions" (Gwynne). The glass ceiling plagues female politicians in the United States as well: although the number of women serving in the American Senate and House of Representatives has risen since suffrage, only 14% of Senators are female and only 18% of Representatives are female ("Women in Office"). Being a feminist is the radical idea that roughly half of all politicians at any given time should be women. Feminism is also the radical idea that a woman can serve in the White House — a situation that still seemed far-fetched in the 21st century.
Gwynne, Peter. "Women in Science: Shattering the Glass Ceiling." Science Careers. Retrieved Nov. 9, 2005.
Hagenbaugh, Barbara. "Women's Pay Suffers Setback." USA Today. 26 Oct. 2004. Retrieved Nov. 9, 2005.
"Women in Office." Emily's List. Retrieved Nov. 9, 2005.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.