Mental Health Screening for College Students in America
This paper examines mental health as a critical healthcare issue affecting college students in the United States. Drawing on a Kaiser Health News report and three peer-reviewed sources, the paper discusses the prevalence of anxiety, depression, substance abuse, and eating disorders among university students, the underutilization of available treatment services, and the role of institutional screening programs in early intervention. The paper also considers validated screening tools, counseling recommendations, and the broader societal implications of untreated student mental illness. The author reflects on how these issues inform their future role as a healthcare leader committed to ensuring accessible mental health care for the next generation.
- Introduction: Mental Health as a Key Healthcare Issue: Depression screening initiative for incoming college students
- Prevalence and Consequences of Mental Illness Among College Students: Mental illness rates and treatment gaps in universities
- Screening Tools and Treatment Gaps: SASS screening tool and underutilization of campus services
- Institutional Strategies and Counseling Recommendations: Counseling centers, mentorship programs, and prevention strategies
- Leadership Implications for Healthcare: Future healthcare leadership and student mental health access
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Integrates a timely news article with three peer-reviewed sources to build a multi-layered argument, demonstrating both currency and scholarly grounding.
- Moves logically from problem identification (prevalence and risk) through evidence review to practical recommendations, giving the paper a coherent arc.
- Closes with a personal leadership reflection that connects academic content to professional application, showing purposeful synthesis rather than simple summary.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper models source synthesis effectively: rather than treating each article in isolation, it uses each source to add a distinct layer to the argument — establishing prevalence, quantifying treatment gaps, introducing a validated screening instrument, and then proposing institutional remedies. This cumulative structure strengthens the central claim that college mental health screening is both necessary and actionable.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a news event to anchor the issue in current practice, then builds evidential support across three body paragraphs, each tied to a separate scholarly source. A concluding paragraph shifts register from evidence review to reflective leadership analysis. References follow APA formatting conventions. The structure suits a short response or reflection paper at the undergraduate level.
Introduction: Mental Health as a Key Healthcare Issue
One of the key healthcare issues in America — as well as globally — is mental health. A news article by Rinker (2017) in Kaiser Health News describes the mental health problems experienced by college students. According to the article, when students begin their lives in college, many of them experience anxiety, struggle to adjust, and may fall into serious depression or self-destructive thoughts. In response to this issue, a university chancellor proclaimed that the institution would offer free mental health screenings to all incoming students, including transfer and freshman students. In acknowledgment of the stress that new students face as they begin college life, the university aimed to screen for depression to help ensure that all students are mentally healthy. The institution also planned to screen for traits associated with depression, including mood disturbances, anxiety, and suicidal tendencies, and to provide healthcare assistance to students in need.
The news event highlights the significance of screening for and addressing the mental health of college students. College age is a critical period during which students begin realizing their full potential, and it represents a suitable time when the adult life trajectory is established (Rinker, 2017).
Prevalence and Consequences of Mental Illness Among College Students
Several scholarly articles support the importance of this issue. According to Eisenberg et al. (2012), a great many mental health problems have their initial onset by age 24, and these conditions account for more disability-adjusted life years than any other category of illness among adolescents and young adults in the United States. Every year, new students enter college and must cope with significant life changes, which can be extremely difficult. There is a great need to increase the use of appropriate services among university students with serious mental health problems, as neglect in this area can lead to severe long-term consequences. Mental illnesses that emerge early in life are substantial predictors of educational achievement, occupational performance, social functioning, and mortality.
Despite this, the majority of college students suffering from mental health problems do not receive treatment. This lack of treatment represents a missed opportunity to reduce the burden of mental illness in the broader population. Eisenberg et al. (2012) offer recommendations for next steps to improve knowledge and practice in this area. Current intervention strategies in the college environment focus on awareness of and attitudes toward mental illness and available treatment options. These strategies include anti-stigma campaigns, screening programs, and caregiver training. The authors note that society as a whole stands to benefit from effective intervention, given the enormous burden of mental illness and the unique opportunity presented by the college setting.
Screening Tools and Treatment Gaps
Downs et al. (2013) indicate that university students are at significant risk for mental health problems. Statistics show that approximately 33 to 50 percent of college students experience mental health difficulties that affect their functioning at any given time. The most prevalent mental health issues among college students include anxiety, depression, substance abuse, and eating disorders. Given this level of risk, it is unsurprising that many universities have medical and mental health providers located directly on campus or otherwise accessible to students.
Unfortunately, despite the availability of low- or no-cost examination and treatment services, data suggest that the majority of students with psychological health problems do not receive treatment. Research has established that between 62 and 92 percent of university students experiencing significant mental health difficulties do not obtain any form of treatment. In response to this gap, Downs et al. (2013) developed the Symptoms and Assets Screening Scale (SASS), which proved to be reliable and valid and was capable of examining constructs similar to established measures used with college students. The article demonstrates that the SASS is a tool with the potential to effectively screen for the most prevalent psychological health issues in university populations.
References
Bhujade, V. M. (2017). Depression, anxiety and academic stress among college students: A brief review. Indian Journal of Health & Wellbeing, 8(7), 748–751.
Downs, A., Boucher, L. A., Campbell, D. G., & Dasse, M. (2013). Development and initial validation of the Symptoms and Assets Screening Scale. Journal of American College Health, 61(3), 164–174.
Eisenberg, D., Hunt, J., & Speer, N. (2012). Help seeking for mental health on college campuses: Review of evidence and next steps for research and practice. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 20(4), 222–232.
Rinker, B. (2017). University offers depression screening to thousands of incoming students. Kaiser Health News. Retrieved September 28, 2017, from http://khn.org/news/ucla-offers-depression-screening-to-thousands-of-incoming-students/
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.