Michelle Rhee Case Study: Principled Negotiation Failures
This case study examines Michelle Rhee's tenure as Chancellor of the Washington D.C. public school system through the framework of principled negotiation as outlined in Fisher, Ury, and Patton's Getting to Yes and Ury's Getting to Yes with Yourself. Drawing on the PBS Frontline documentary The Education of Michelle Rhee, the paper analyzes how Rhee's top-down, win-lose approach to school reform failed to incorporate core negotiation principles, including reframing, inclusion, mutual gain, separating people from problems, and focusing on interests over positions. The paper argues that her inability to apply these principles ultimately led to political backlash, questions about reform legitimacy, and her forced resignation.
- Moving from Self-Judgment to Self-Understanding: Rhee's autocratic style lacked honest self-reflection
- Moving from Blame to Self-Responsibility: Rhee needed earlier accountability for reform failures
- Reframing the Picture from Unfriendly to Friendly: Rhee's negative public framing cost her support
- Moving from Resistance to Acceptance and Exclusion to Inclusion: Rhee excluded stakeholders and refused compromise
- Moving from Win-Lose to Win-Win-Win: Rhee pursued victory over mutual benefit
- Focusing on Interests, Mutual Gain, and Objective Criteria: Rhee ignored shared interests and misapplied objective measures
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Consistently applies a clear theoretical framework — Fisher, Ury, and Patton's principled negotiation principles — to a specific real-world case, making abstract concepts concrete and analytical.
- Each section follows a disciplined structure: introduce the principle, show how Rhee violated or failed to apply it, and explain what a better approach would have looked like.
- Uses the PBS Frontline documentary as a grounded evidentiary source, anchoring claims about Rhee's behavior in documented events rather than speculation.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied theoretical analysis — taking an established academic framework (principled negotiation) and systematically testing a real case against each of its dimensions. Rather than summarizing the theory or summarizing the documentary, the paper uses each to interrogate the other, producing original analytical observations at each step.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized around seven negotiation principles drawn from Fisher et al. (2011) and Ury (2015), each treated as a section heading. An introductory section establishes the stakes and thesis. Middle sections address self-judgment, blame, reframing, acceptance, inclusion, and win-lose thinking. The final section covers the importance of objective criteria before a reference list closes the paper. This modular structure makes the argument easy to follow and assess.
Moving from Self-Judgment to Self-Understanding
In Getting to Yes with Yourself, Ury (2015) applies the principle of understanding to the process of self-reflection. Ury argues that self-judgment is unproductive and that, in order to truly understand ourselves, we must be willing to look at our own interests and motivations honestly. This approach is notably absent in the documentary The Education of Michelle Rhee (PBS Frontline, 2013), which follows the former chancellor of the Washington D.C. public school system as she attempts to reform the city's education system. Throughout the film, Rhee faces difficult decisions that require her to consider both her own interests and those of the students she is trying to serve. In the end, she does little to apply the principles of Getting to Yes; instead, she operates on her own authority to make changes that upset stakeholders and constituents, who respond by electing a new mayor and forcing Rhee's resignation.
By applying the principles of principled negotiation, one can make tough choices that align with one's values and goals, and as a result achieve remarkable progress in a short period of time. However, in Rhee's case, when she was dressed down by the Chair of the Council of the District of Columbia, she tried to stand up for herself, stating that she was the head of the agency and had to make tough decisions about moving budget allocations — but the Chair reminded her that she was supposed to listen to the legislative body, which she was not doing. Others clearly saw her as autocratic and unwilling to listen to the needs of students and parents. Thus, this situation reflects a profound need for moving from self-judgment to genuine self-understanding.
Moving from Blame to Self-Responsibility
In the art of negotiation, it is easy to fall into the trap of blame. One party may blame the other for intransigence or unwillingness to compromise. However, blame is seldom productive in negotiation. It is far more effective to take responsibility for one's own actions. By doing so, each party retains dignity and can focus on finding a mutually agreeable solution. Taking responsibility also helps to build trust between parties, and once trust has been established, it becomes easier to find common ground and reach a successful outcome.
There is some evidence that Rhee attempted this — for example, she stepped aside after the election, allowing the effects of her reforms to be felt in the political sphere and accepting the voters' pushback. Nonetheless, she was widely regarded as a fierce reformer: one who did the necessary work of closing half-empty schools and firing incompetent teachers and administrators. At least, that is one way to view it. On the other hand, it could be argued that Rhee needed to hold herself more accountable. She tied teacher tenure to student performance and saw test scores improve, but before the year was out, questions arose about the legitimacy of those scores (PBS Frontline, 2013). When performance metrics are tied to tenure, the incentive to cheat increases — and that is very likely what happened. There is strong evidence, therefore, that Rhee should have moved from blame to self-responsibility far sooner and re-evaluated the merits of her reform ideas.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.