This paper examines how military deployment affects service members' families across multiple dimensions, including children's education, financial hardship, mental health, and marital stability. Drawing on congressional testimony, news reporting, and government studies, the paper documents the educational obstacles military children face when changing schools — such as mismatched graduation requirements, delayed transcripts, and residency-based tuition barriers — alongside the economic pressures and elevated divorce rates linked to deployment. The paper also surveys existing military support programs and proposes additional solutions, including expanded base housing, corporate tax incentives for hiring military spouses, and improved childcare access, arguing that stable family support systems ultimately strengthen the readiness of deployed service members.
The paper demonstrates effective use of embedded quotation as evidence. Rather than paraphrasing all sources, the writer allows voices — a military family advocate, an Army chaplain, a military spouse testifying before Congress — to speak directly, lending authenticity and specificity to what could otherwise be abstract social commentary. This technique is particularly effective when illustrating the substandard housing conditions at Quantico or the financial calculations junior-enlisted families must make.
The paper opens with geopolitical context (the lead-up to the Iraq War) to establish urgency, then narrows to the family experience through thematic sections. Each middle section addresses one aspect of the deployment burden: education, financial/marital stress, and mental health. The final two sections shift register from problem to solution, discussing both existing programs and additional policy proposals. The conclusion synthesizes the major findings and reiterates the argument that family support is inseparable from military effectiveness.
Americans waited with anxious anticipation as the federal government attempted to convince the United Nations that a war with Iraq was warranted. President Bush and Colin Powell spent days addressing the issue and presenting evidence of the need to forcibly disarm Iraq. As the world watched events unfold, nations lined up on one side or the other. France, Germany, and Russia asked the United States to hold off on an attack and explore whether a more peaceful solution could be reached. Britain, Canada, and several others pledged that if war erupted, they would send troops to stand alongside American service personnel.
The world waited and watched, and each American became acutely aware of the ramifications that war might bring. While the waiting was hard on most Americans, there was a segment of the population for whom it was excruciating: the families of military personnel. These families had put their lives in limbo while awaiting deployment orders. Thousands of troops had already been deployed to the Middle East in anticipation of a coming war, and their families had already begun living the life they would lead once the conflict broke out.
Military families are often considered a breed of their own. They are expected to be stoic, strong, and resilient as they say goodbye to spouses, children, sons, daughters, and siblings when their loved ones are shipped off to war or sent on peacekeeping missions. Military families have dealt with deployment issues since the inception of the nation. With each war, skirmish, or peacekeeping mission, families of deployed service members do what it takes to move forward while waiting for their loved ones to come home.
When deployment orders arrive, they may direct a service member to go overseas directly, or to a U.S. base from which they will then ship out. The order to deploy triggers many changes for both the service member and their family. Deployment affects not only the daily life of the service member but the life of everyone in that family (Caught, 2001).
Most Americans have some awareness of how military families operate. They have seen children enter classrooms and leave again, only to get temporarily settled elsewhere. Many spouses find jobs, begin climbing the career ladder, and then must leave because their partner is deployed again. The military has begun to recognize the scope of these disruptions and the need for programs to assist the families it so frequently uproots (Caught, 2001).
The fabric of some military families can be expected to unravel, particularly after a prolonged period of peacetime. As Mary Edwards Wertsch, author of Military Brats: Legacies of Childhood Inside the Fortress, explains: "Technically, the military is always being prepared. But the question for the spouse and children is how prepared they can really be for the reality" (Peterson, 2001).
One of the most affected aspects of military deployment is the way it shapes the lives of children within the deployed family. There are ramifications at every age and stage that the remaining parent must manage after deployment orders are issued.
School issues are a foundational concern for children of deployed American service personnel. Children in military families often find themselves relocated every year or two, uprooted from their friends, clubs, and teachers, and moved to a new school — frequently in the middle of the school year. Classmates who have already formed their friendships may not welcome a new child warmly. This can create stress and insecurity for the arriving child, who has not only been uprooted academically but often has a parent who has recently been sent to a remote location in service to the nation.
When military children transfer to a new school, their transcripts frequently have not yet arrived. The child is then left trying to convince the educational system that they belong in honors or advanced classes. Wanting to play it safe, schools often place these children in courses below their ability level. The reverse can also happen: a child may arrive at a new school and find themselves academically lost. School districts vary considerably from state to state in their academic levels and curriculum sequences. A child of a deployed military family can find themselves in a school where everyone is far ahead of where their previous school was, leaving them struggling socially and academically at the same time (Peterson, 2001).
For many children in military families, an overseas deployment means a physical move — from Norfolk, Virginia, back to an aunt's or uncle's home in the Midwest, for example. For the 7.7% of single parents in the military, such address changes are a certainty. That means students must not only attend a new school but also battle a new education bureaucracy. As one report notes, "Transcripts arrive late, which means students end up stuck in classes beneath their abilities" (Peterson, 2001).
Children who arrive at their new school before their records do are often placed in a middle academic track as a default. When records eventually arrive and the child's actual abilities become apparent, they are moved again. This cycle of repeated re-placement is extremely stressful for a young child who has already sacrificed friendships and familiar classroom routines (Peterson, 2001).
For high school students in military families, deployment can have devastating effects on education. High school students must maintain a sufficient GPA for college admission, yet they encounter wide variation in graduation requirements across states and districts. Some schools require 26 credits for graduation while others require only 24. Some use semester grading while others use a quarterly system. Some operate on a block schedule with 90-minute to two-hour classes, while others offer six to eight shorter courses per day. If a student transfers, a required class may simply not be available in time for graduation (Peterson, 2001).
Particularly unfair are requirements that force students who have already passed a graduation exam in one state to retake a different exam required by their new state. When the U.S. Army transferred 16-year-old Bonner Jones' father from Fort Hood to Fort McPherson, Jones had to move from a high school in Killeen, Texas, to one outside Atlanta, Georgia, and begin preparing for Georgia's exit exam — despite having already passed Texas' equivalent test (Peterson, 2001).
Military family high school students face differing graduation requirements, grading scales, schedule systems, and course offerings. Even after navigating all of these obstacles, many do not qualify for honors distinctions or awards because school districts often require students to have attended for a predetermined number of semesters to be eligible. And even after completing high school, these students are frequently blocked from their preferred colleges by residency requirements that deny them in-state tuition rates.
"Many seniors don't qualify for lower in-state tuition at public universities in their new state — an important consideration for Army enlisted personnel earning about $30,000 a year. Unfair? Obviously. But while 18 states require that students pass an exit exam to graduate from high school, not one has a reciprocal agreement that would help students such as Jones" (Peterson, 2001).
Approximately 31 states have begun studying ways to assist these students, who are harmed through no fault of their own — their only circumstance being their relationship to a deployed service member.
The nation watches and waits to see if it will go to war with Iraq, but regardless of the outcome, military personnel will continue to be deployed to various parts of the world. As long as there is a military, there will be deployment, and the families of those deployed will belong to a cultural community that is unique unto itself. These families face formidable challenges across education, employment, and mental health.
You’re 41% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.