This paper examines the major Christian theological interpretations of the millennial reign of Jesus Christ and the Second Coming, tracing their historical development from the early church through the modern era. It surveys premillennialism, amillennialism, postmillennialism, preterism, and dispensationalism, drawing on figures such as St. Augustine and Craig Blaising. The paper also evaluates how these eschatological frameworks have shaped significant social and political movements, and argues that the breadth of scriptural interpretations makes arriving at a single definitive understanding of the end times essentially futile.
The vast majority of Christians today look forward to the future glorious return of Christ and the realization of the Kingdom of God. This return was promised by Jesus himself, as he told his disciples that he went to prepare a place to which he would take his followers (John 14:1–4). The surety of Christ's return was so strong that he even promised his disciples: "There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom" (Matthew 16:28). However, as just these two verses suggest, there is a great deal of conflict and confusion about the precise meaning of these prophecies of a Second Coming.
The first generation of Christians in the early church consistently referred to themselves as living in the last days and in the end times. The same eschatological passion reasserted itself in the Middle Ages as the first millennium after Christ's death passed. Today, two thousand years later, some sections of the church are once more caught up in fascination with the idea of the end times and the certainty that signs point to the imminent return of Christ. Even the media is saturated with apocalyptic themes, from the best-selling Left Behind books to popular television shows such as Revelations.
A closer look at the work of historical and modern theologians, however, reveals the actual complexity of Christian responses to the Second Coming — responses that are all equally rooted in existing scripture. The degree to which the scriptures support such a wide range of interpretations demonstrates the futility of trying to determine a single, exact understanding of the end times.
Historically, the church has never had a truly definitive "orthodox" eschatology. During the early years of the church, various ideas competed, and their competition left marks on the books of the Bible themselves. For example, in 2 Thessalonians, Paul warns the church not to believe those who claim that Christ has already returned. During the first three centuries, a form of historical premillennialism became widely, though not universally, accepted. This belief was taught by authors such as Tertullian, Irenaeus, Justin Martyr, and many others who have been highly influential in shaping Christian history and theology. This premillennialism taught that the Antichrist would come, bringing a seven-year tribulation; then the Rapture would lead to the conquering of evil and the earthly millennium, ending in a final judgment and the creation of a new heaven and earth.
In the fourth century, however, premillennialism of this sort was determined to be heretical and largely disappeared. It was resurrected, after a fashion, in the mid-1800s under the name dispensationalism. In the meantime, the church had turned toward amillennialism, which was embraced by St. Augustine — one of the most influential of early Christian orthodox writers. According to this view, when the Rapture finally comes, the earth will be abandoned for heaven and the final judgment effected. This remains the position of the Catholic Church.
The nineteenth century that saw the creation of dispensationalism also produced postmillennialism, which theorizes that Christians will eventually create a time of peace and goodwill on earth for a long span — a figurative or literal millennium — and that when this Kingdom of God has approached perfection, Christ will return. This theory gave rise to both the vital Social Gospel movement among social liberals and the more controversial Dominionism currently in fashion among political neo-conservatives (Robinson). As this historical overview shows, the idea of a millennial reign of Christ has been hotly contested throughout church history, and it has also been closely aligned with major social changes in the church. Premillennialism gave way to amillennialism as the church ceased being so actively persecuted. Postmillennialism and the new premillennialism both gave rise to significant political movements. Preterism — the belief that the events of Revelation have already occurred — has often collided with postmillennialism and amillennialism.
Modern premillennialism is defended by Craig Blaising in the third part of the book Three Views on the Millennium and Beyond. In his chapter, he argues that the most salient feature of premillennialism is: "The foremost conviction is that Jesus is coming back. All hopes and expectations for the future are focused on his return…" (Blaising, 157). He describes how premillennialism holds that the Rapture — the sudden return of Christ in which believers will be caught up into the air to meet him — will occur at some time before, during, or immediately after a seven-year period known as the Tribulation. This period is defined by the rise and rule of the Antichrist, the persecution of believers, supernatural plagues and catastrophes, and the eventual war of Armageddon. After the Tribulation, Christ will return in glory to establish a thousand-year reign of peace.
Blaising begins his argument by suggesting that competing eschatologies are less concerned with the sequence of final events than with their perception of the nature of heaven. As he writes: "Amillennial and postmillennial rejections of premillennialism traditionally have had more to do with a preunderstanding of what is 'proper,' 'fitting' or 'plausible' in relation to their traditional expectations about eternal life than with any specific biblical teaching contradicting the premillennial coming of Christ." (Blaising, 160).
He proceeds to define two alternative views of heaven: the "spiritual vision model" and the "new creation model." The former is a neo-Platonic idea that heaven is the changeless and ceaseless contemplation of Truth and God in an immaterial plane — an idea he associates with post- and amillennial arguments. He contrasts this with the more earthy "new creation model," which sees heaven and the Kingdom of God as a holistic recreation of body and soul in a new, physical earth. Saints dwell in a bodiless heaven, he suggests, until they are physically resurrected in the new earth. The key to premillennialism, in his view, is that only in this fashion does one achieve the full realization of a Kingdom of God on earth.
"Key doctrinal differences between old and new premillennialism"
"Pop-culture apocalypticism and the Left Behind phenomenon"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.