This paper examines the role of minority groups — including women, African-Americans, and Hispanics — in the United States police force, tracing their history from early exclusion to modern-day challenges. Beginning with the appointment of the first female officer in 1910, the paper surveys discriminatory hiring practices, limited promotion opportunities, and the cultural attitudes that have historically disadvantaged minority officers. It reviews research on actual work performance, finding that stereotypes about physical and intellectual inferiority are not supported by evidence. The paper concludes by drawing on David C. Couper's "seven seeds of policing" to propose reforms centered on diversity, community policing, and cultural change within law enforcement agencies.
The paper demonstrates effective use of secondary sources to build a cumulative argument. Rather than presenting each source in isolation, the writer synthesizes findings from Trostle and Palombo to show that research consistently contradicts the stereotypes used to justify discrimination — effectively turning the evidence against the prejudice it is meant to justify.
The paper is organized into four sections. The first provides historical context for minority hiring in policing, with separate attention to women and racial minorities. The second examines the cultural and institutional challenges minority officers face once hired. The third reviews empirical research on the actual performance of these officers. The final section proposes a reform framework using Couper's "seven seeds of policing," concluding with a normative call for cultural change within law enforcement.
The history of the police force is both interesting and varied. The paradigms associated with the force, as well as factors of social development and diversity, have made it a particularly difficult field in which minority groups — such as women, African-Americans, and Hispanics — can find and maintain careers.
The first female police officer to be appointed in the United States was Alice Stebbing Wells (Trostle 93). She was appointed in 1910 and served at the Los Angeles Police Department. With her appointment came a defining paradigm: female officers were assigned to traditionally gendered roles such as working with juveniles, female offenders, and female victims. This began a legacy of exclusion for female officers, who were frequently barred from routine male-dominated activities such as patrol and other crime-fighting duties. The first women assigned to routine patrol duty only received this opportunity in 1968, in Indianapolis.
Incongruent with this exclusion is the fact that women — who were often better educated than their male counterparts — were also denied promotional opportunities, and that their entrance requirements were set higher than those for men (Trostle 93).
These conditions fostered a historically negative attitude among male officers toward their female colleagues. Women were regarded as physically weaker and intellectually inferior. Since policing was traditionally viewed as a job requiring physical rather than mental ability, women were considered unsuitable for the profession.
Nevertheless, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 deems such views discriminatory and illegal (Palombo). According to the Act, no member of any race, sex, or ethnic group should be disadvantaged by the hiring practices of any organization, including law enforcement agencies. Negative attitudes have persisted regardless, despite efforts to include both women and other minorities in the police force. Some of these attitudes have resulted in lawsuits — a prominent example being the case of Fanchon Blake (Trostle 91). This female sergeant filed suit against the Los Angeles Police Department for unlawful discrimination after she was denied permission to sit for the lieutenant's examination. She won her case in 1980, following which certain conditions were established regarding the treatment of minority groups.
Black and Hispanic groups have encountered the same obstacles when attempting to enter the police force. According to Trostle (95), law enforcement agencies discriminated against racial minorities in much the same way as against women; African-American and Hispanic officers only began to be hired in significant numbers during the 1990s. The racial history of the United States thus produced discriminatory practices that were especially pronounced within police departments operating in minority neighborhoods, where crime and poverty were frequently concentrated. Congressional pressure to increase minority hiring — through programs such as the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration and the Law Enforcement Education Program — increased resentment and hostility toward African-American and Hispanic officers among existing white officers. Conversely, the image of the police force within minority communities was far from positive (Trostle 96). This further complicated racial relations within police departments: minority communities experienced officers as brutish, while many officers viewed those communities as degenerate, criminal, or of lower intelligence. These historically cultivated attitudes remain part of the challenges now facing both the existing police force and new recruits.
The greatest challenge faced by women, African-Americans, and Hispanics joining the police force is the attitude of white male officers toward them. Women, for example, are perceived as physically weak and inadequate to handle many of an officer's duties. This is one reason why these groups are often reluctant to apply for positions in law enforcement. Some women may genuinely believe that police work is primarily physical and that they would fail to meet its demands. More realistically, others recognize that the limited promotion and recruitment opportunities available to women constitute an obstacle they are unwilling to confront.
This perspective is articulated by Bernadette Jones Palombo (63). Research has documented relatively low ambitions among women in the police force, particularly among women who also belong to a racial minority group. This has reinforced a poor managerial view of them — yet the low ambition may itself be a product of that very attitude. The result is a self-reinforcing cycle from which women and minorities have few resources to escape.
It is further suggested that social change occurs most slowly at the cultural level, as opposed to structural and technological areas. While the structure and technology of policing have changed significantly, the same cannot be said for the cultural values within the force. One manifestation of this lag is the belief among white officers that standards have been lowered to accommodate minority recruits — and that white male officers have themselves become a new minority. On the other hand, minority officers who are hired often find themselves demoralized by what they perceive as a white male "buddy system" within the department (Trostle 97). It is thus clear that these challenges will not be easily overcome without significant effort from all parties involved.
The sections above address only the recruiting and background aspects of female and minority participation in the police force. There are numerous studies investigating the actual effectiveness and work performance of these officers.
Some of these are cited by Palombo (76). The studies find that gender plays no significant role in effective police work and that women in fact perform many tasks better than men.
You’re 64% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.