This paper provides an introductory comparison of two widely used psychological assessment instruments: the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2) and the California Psychological Inventory (CPI). The paper traces the origins of the MMPI-2, describes its 567-item structure, typical administration conditions, and its applications in clinical, legal, and occupational settings. It then outlines the CPI's focus on interpersonal behavior and social interaction in normal populations, its eighteen scales, and its four broad categories. The paper concludes by contrasting the two instruments, noting that while they share 194 items, they differ fundamentally in purpose: the MMPI-2 targets clinical diagnosis of mental illness, while the CPI assesses everyday social behavior in non-clinical individuals.
The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) was developed in the late 1930s by a psychologist named Starke R. Hathaway and a psychiatrist named J. C. McKinley. It is frequently used as a clinical testing instrument and is one of the most researched psychological tests in existence. The MMPI is not a perfect test, but it continues to be a valuable tool in the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness (Van Wagner, 2009).
The MMPI-2 is most frequently used by mental health professionals to assess and diagnose mental illness. It has also been used in fields outside of clinical psychology, including legal cases such as criminal defense proceedings and custody disputes. The test has been used as a screening instrument for certain professions, especially those involving high-risk work, though this application has been controversial over the years. The MMPI-2 is also used to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment programs, including substance abuse programs (Van Wagner, 2009).
The MMPI-2 is made up of 567 test items and takes approximately 60 to 90 minutes to complete. The test is usually administered, scored, and interpreted by a professional — typically a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist — who has received specific training in its use. The MMPI-2 is often used in collaboration with other assessment tools, and it is generally accepted that a diagnosis should never be made solely on the basis of MMPI-2 results.
The MMPI-2 may be administered individually or in groups, and a computerized version is available. The test is designed for individuals who are 18 years of age or older. Scoring can be completed by hand or by computer, but results should always be interpreted by a qualified mental health professional with extensive training in MMPI-2 interpretation (Van Wagner, 2009).
The California Psychological Inventory (CPI) is designed to evaluate interpersonal behavior and social interaction in normal individuals. Each scale is intended to forecast what a person will say or do under defined conditions, and to identify individuals who will be described in characteristic ways by others who know them well or who observe their behavior in particular contexts. The scales are organized for convenience into four broad categories that bring together those with related implications. The underlying logic of the categories is interpretational rather than factorial, and the four categories are not necessarily intended to constitute psychometric entities (California Psychological Inventory Scales, 2009).
The items on the inventory produce scores for 18 different scales, which are divided into four classes. These classes include: measures of poise, ascendancy, self-assurance, and interpersonal adequacy; measures of socialization, responsibility, intrapersonal values, and character; measures of achievement potential and intellectual efficiency; and measures of intellectual and interest modes (California Psychological Inventory Scales, 2009).
These two tests differ considerably in what they are used for. The MMPI-2 is primarily used to diagnose and treat mental illness in adults, while the CPI is used for individuals aged 13 and older who are considered psychologically normal, in order to evaluate interpersonal behavior and social interaction. It would be highly unlikely that the two tests would be used together in the same case, given that each measures something fundamentally different.
"Eighteen scales divided into four broad classes"
"Key similarities and fundamental differences between instruments"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.