This paper examines the theologies of hope developed by Jürgen Moltmann and Wolfhart Pannenberg, two influential twentieth-century theologians who both center their thought on eschatology and the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Drawing on key works including Moltmann's Theology of Hope (1967) and Pannenberg's Revelation as History (1968), the paper traces their shared conviction that God's promise overcomes suffering and evil, while also mapping points of divergence. Moltmann emphasizes God as a fellow-sufferer who calls believers to active participation in improving the present world; Pannenberg stresses the resurrection as a verifiable historical event and the completion of creation. Together, their frameworks offer a robust Christian basis for hope oriented toward God's coming Kingdom.
"For I know the plans I have for you, declares the LORD, plans for welfare and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope." — Jeremiah 29:11
A significant theological shift that took place in the 1960s involved an attempt to understand Christianity through a deep focus on the awareness of Jesus' impending return and what it would mean for humanity — a hope for the future. As mankind has become increasingly unhappy with society's ills — crime, evil, violence, hatred, and death — a hope has developed that is rooted in peace and justice. Many theologians have contributed to this body of thought. Jürgen Moltmann and Wolfhart Pannenberg are two central figures who share many similar perspectives about the theology of hope. This paper examines them in greater detail, along with some differences in their points of view.
As theologians, both Moltmann and Pannenberg place a great deal of emphasis on eschatology, a branch of theology concerned with the final events in the history of the world or of humankind (Harvie, 2008). Both develop their theology from a Trinitarian understanding of God. However, Moltmann is much more focused on practical realities and the experiences of life, and on what the Trinity's story of suffering says about the nature of God (Schweitzer, 2012). Specifically, Moltmann is more concerned with the promise of God to act in the future than with His actions in the past. God, in his view, suffers alongside mankind and understands our joys and sorrows intimately. God has promised to bring about a change through the sacrifice of His only begotten Son.
According to Moltmann, Christ's resurrection will mark the beginning of a new era and the fulfillment of God's promise of a positive, peaceful future (Schweitzer, 2012). The crucifixion served as the means by which mankind could achieve everlasting life. Thus, all those who believe can remain hopeful despite whatever pain the world around us may bring. In 1967, Moltmann wrote Theology of Hope: On the Ground and the Implications of Christian Eschatology. In it, he challenges Christians not to be passive participants while awaiting the Kingdom of God, but to be active agents who have a role in making the world a better place (Schweitzer, 2012). We are to engage with practical realities — not merely observing human misfortune, but acting to improve our time in the physical world, not just for ourselves but for others as well. In short, we work through the present with a hope for the future that we can trust because it has been secured by Christ's life and promised by God. For Moltmann, eschatology is not the end of the world; rather, it is the beginning and foundation of our hope and faith. In this famous work, he writes:
Eschatology means the doctrine of the Christian hope, which embraces both the object hoped for and also the hope inspired by it. From first to last, and not merely in the epilogue, Christianity is eschatology, is hope, forward looking and forward moving, and therefore also revolutionizing and transforming the present (p. 16).
The nature of God in Moltmann's eyes is that of a loving father. God will rescue mankind from suffering, evil, and death. He understands the human condition and has promised to save those who believe. We can conclude from Moltmann's words that he believes God is inherently good, even though He allows us to dwell in a world of suffering (Schweitzer, 2012). Suffering is not rationalized; rather, Moltmann acknowledges it and affirms God's participation in our lives through His observance and testing of our faith through challenges. God's words and instructions serve as a roadmap for the true Christian. Hope is the one true way to overcome suffering. We should live justly, fairly, and rightly, and lean on God's promise of victory over evil.
Wolfhart Pannenberg shares many of these same perspectives and is also a highly influential figure in the theology of hope. His works include Revelation as History (1968) and Jesus, God and Man (1968). Pannenberg's perspective was one of systematic theology involving an eschatological orientation centered on hope. He offers an understanding of the resurrection as the beginning and emphasizes this far more than Moltmann does. He is greatly concerned with the authenticity of the resurrection as a true historical event in which Jesus Christ experienced an eschatological transformation. Pannenberg classifies this transformation as the hope and ultimate destiny of humanity (Hallenger, 2008). Thus, humanity lives with a hopeful expectancy for God's Kingdom to come. Only at that time will the glory of God be fully realized.
"Both theologians view eschaton as conquering suffering"
"Key differences on resurrection's historical character"
The Christian hope is to live with confidence in the newness and fullness of life, and to await the coming of Christ in glory and the completion of God's purpose for the world. Both Moltmann and Pannenberg's theologies of hope are centered in the resurrection of the crucified Christ and view it as the source of optimism for mankind. For Moltmann, the resurrection is not a historical event trusted merely as having occurred; it is a truth in which humanity participates through the mission of the risen Christ. Pannenberg argues for a more historical characterization of the resurrected Jesus, directing humankind toward eschatology through that historical lens.
You’re 57% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.