Moral Education as a Strategy to Reduce Peer Bullying
This research proposal examines the problem of peer bullying at a tuition-free, open-enrollment charter middle school in Albany, New York, and proposes a moral education intervention as a sustainable solution. Drawing on a review of existing literature, the paper identifies the academic, social, behavioral, and emotional consequences of bullying for both victims and perpetrators. It analyzes classroom and playground environments as key contexts where bullying occurs, critiques punitive "zero tolerance" approaches, and argues that positive school climates supported by moral education components offer a more effective alternative. The proposal outlines research hypotheses, a qualitative-quantitative methodology using incident report data, and specific recommendations for curriculum integration and ongoing program evaluation.
- Introduction and School Context: Charter school background and bullying problem overview
- Statement of the Problem and Study Objectives: Bullying harms and primary study objective
- Literature Review: Peer Bullying in Schools: Research on bullying causes, settings, and effects
- Moral Education and Positive School Climate: Climate-based and moral education intervention strategies
- Research Problem, Hypotheses, and Methodology: Research questions, hypotheses, and data collection plan
- Limitations, Conclusions, and Recommendations: Study limitations and actionable school recommendations
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The proposal grounds its argument in a specific institutional context — a real charter school serving a high-need population — which makes the intervention concrete and credible rather than abstract.
- The literature review is well-integrated, drawing on multiple peer-reviewed sources to build a cumulative case against punitive approaches and in favor of climate-based moral education interventions.
- The use of numbered lists to present stressors, positive climate elements, and discussion-group benefits makes complex material scannable and structurally transparent.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective problem-solution structuring: it defines the problem with empirical evidence, critiques existing inadequate solutions (zero tolerance, medication), and then builds toward a proposed alternative through progressive literature support. This funnel approach — broad research context narrowing to a specific intervention — is a strong model for applied educational research proposals.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a standard research proposal format: school context and background, problem statement, objectives, literature review, research questions and hypotheses, methodology and data collection instrument, limitations, and a summary with actionable recommendations. Each section flows logically into the next, with the literature review serving as the analytical backbone that justifies the proposed intervention. The inclusion of a sample data collection form (Table 2) strengthens the methodological section by showing practical readiness for implementation.
Introduction and School Context
Established in 2005, the school discussed in this proposal is a tuition-free, open-enrollment college-preparatory charter middle school serving grades five through seven, located in Albany, New York. The school seeks to provide its students with the education they will need to achieve outstanding academic outcomes and to prepare them for the transition to comparable results in college and beyond. In its short four-year history, the school accomplished its fundamental mission of delivering high-quality educational services to approximately 200 students who consistently scored above national averages on high-stakes assessments such as Terra Nova.
These academic outcomes are all the more significant given the lower socioeconomic and minority demographic profile of the student population, since these students have historically performed at lower levels than their more affluent white counterparts attending suburban middle schools (Adelabu, 2007). In spite of these laudable accomplishments, the school is not free of many of the same problems that plague other middle schools throughout the country. Staff members and faculty have identified a problem with peer bullying on campus in recent months. Because it is the school's responsibility to provide students with a learning environment free of violence and intimidation, this issue has assumed new relevance and importance — and it is also the focus of the study proposed herein.
Statement of the Problem and Study Objectives
Peer bullying has a number of adverse consequences for both victims and perpetrators alike. Leff, Power, Costigan, and Manz (2003) report that "bullies and victims experience a wide range of academic, social, behavioral, and emotional difficulties as they get older" (p. 418). In addition, the growing number of high-profile episodes of school violence and shootings has been closely related to problems of peer bullying (Brendtro, Mitchell, & Mccall, 2007).
The primary objective of the proposed study is to identify best practices for reducing the incidence of peer bullying at the school in sustainable ways.
References
Adelabu, D. H. (2007). Time perspective and school membership as correlates to academic achievement among African-American adolescents. Adolescence, 42(167), 525–526.
Bradshaw, C. P., Sawyer, A. L., & O'Brennan, L. M. (2007). Bullying and peer victimization at school: Perceptual differences between students and school staff. School Psychology Review, 36(3), 361–362.
Brendtro, L. K., Mitchell, M. L., & Mccall, H. (2007). Positive peer culture: Antidote to 'peer deviance training.' Reclaiming Children and Youth, 15(4), 200–201.
Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (2004). Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Garrod, A. (1999). Learning for life: Moral education theory and practice. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishing.
Hazler, R. J., & Carney, J. V. (2002). Empowering peers to prevent youth violence. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and Development, 41(2), 129–131.
Hyman, I. A., & Snook, P. A. (2001). Dangerous schools, alienated students. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 10(3), 133–134.
Koehler, N., & Seger, V. (2005). Response ability pathways: A curriculum for connecting. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 14(2), 121–122.
Laursen, E. K. (2008). Respectful alliances: Many traditional approaches to challenging youth only manage surface behavior or administer superficial interventions. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 17(1), 4–5.
Leff, S. S. (2007). Bullying and peer victimization at school: Considerations and future directions. School Psychology Review, 36(3), 406–407.
Leff, S. S., Power, T. J., Costigan, T. E., & Manz, P. H. (2003). Assessing the climate of the playground and lunchroom: Implications for bullying prevention programming. School Psychology Review, 32(3), 418–419.
Leicester, M., Modgil, C., & Modgil, S. (2000). Moral education and pluralism. London: Falmer Press.
Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among U.S. youth: Prevalence and associations with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094–2100, cited in Bradshaw et al. at p. 361.
Peterson, J. S. (2003). An argument for proactive attention to affective concerns of gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14(2), 62–63.
Robbins, P., & Alvy, H. (2004). The new principal's fieldbook: Strategies for success. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15.
Sewall, G. T. (1999). Religion comes to school. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(1), 10.
Smith, P. K. (1994). What we can do to prevent bullying in school. The Therapist, 1, 12–15.
Taffel, R. (2005). Breaking through to teens: A new psychotherapy for the new adolescence. New York: Guilford Press.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.