Moral Licensing and Racial Sensitivity: Does Being Good Make You Bad?
This paper examines the relationship between moral licensing and four dependent variables: explicit moral self-concept, implicit moral self-concept, racial sensitivity, and pro-social behavior (volunteerism). Using a sample of 107 psychology students living in Australia, participants were assigned to either a control condition or a moral licensing condition involving a crime vignette with an Aboriginal suspect. Drawing on the Implicit Association Test (IAT) and prior research by Aquino, Reed, Merritt, Monin, and others, the study tests whether the opportunity to make a non-racist choice leads to subsequent decreases in moral behavior. Results indicate that moral licensing negatively impacts implicit moral self-concept and reduces willingness to volunteer, while explicit moral self-concept and racial sensitivity scores remained unaffected by condition.
- Introduction: Moral licensing defined and study context established
- Theoretical Background and Prior Research: Prior studies on moral identity and prejudice reviewed
- Study Design and Hypotheses: Four hypotheses and dependent variables introduced
- Discussion of Findings: Each hypothesis evaluated against study results
- Implications and Conclusion: Real-world policy implications of moral licensing
- References: APA citations for all sources consulted
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper clearly operationalizes each dependent variable and explains why it was selected, giving the reader a logical framework for evaluating the hypotheses before the discussion begins.
- It distinguishes carefully between explicit and implicit measures of moral self-concept, explaining why the IAT has greater predictive power than self-report scales — a nuanced methodological point that strengthens the theoretical argument.
- The discussion connects findings back to real-world policy implications (e.g., mandatory community service for offenders), grounding abstract psychological theory in practical consequences.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses hypothesis-driven structure, stating four numbered hypotheses in the introduction and revisiting each one sequentially in the discussion. This creates a tight argumentative loop that keeps the analysis focused and makes it easy to evaluate whether each prediction was supported or refuted by the evidence.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an abstract summarizing the study design and results, followed by an introduction that contextualizes moral licensing within social-cultural moral psychology and introduces the study's four hypotheses. A discussion section then addresses each hypothesis in turn, covering explicit self-concept, implicit self-concept (IAT), racial sensitivity, and volunteerism. The paper closes with broader cultural implications — such as the potential counterproductive effects of mandatory community service — before listing APA-formatted references.
Introduction
Morality is a social construct, with individuals deriving their ethical standards from social and cultural frameworks. It should come as no surprise, therefore, that moral behavior is not determined solely by an individual's personal beliefs, but also by how that individual perceives his or her actions will be viewed by others. Moral licensing refers to the notion that prior behavior — either one's own or that of others in one's group — can influence an individual's subsequent behavior. "Moral self-licensing occurs because good deeds make people feel secure in their moral self-regard" (Merritt et al., 2012). This feeling of security appears to discourage people from questioning their internal moral impulses and comparing them to cultural norms and standards of behavior, which, rather than increasing their likelihood of engaging in moral behavior, actually increases their likelihood of engaging in immoral behavior.
Moral licensing is particularly evident when one examines bigotry and prejudiced behavior. The theory is that people are more willing — rather than less willing — to "express prejudiced attitudes when their group members' prior behavior has established non-prejudiced credentials" (Kouchaki, 2011). This effect is exacerbated when the individual identifies strongly with group members, and it occurs even when the individual was not personally involved in the original non-prejudicial decision-making process.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.