This paper examines motivation theories demonstrated in two business case studies: Mary Ellen Sheets' founding of Two Men and a Truck and Kleinfeld's leadership at Siemens. Both leaders applied Maslow's hierarchy of needs, goal-setting theory, expectancy theory, and job enrichment theory to build high-performing teams. The paper analyzes how Sheets leveraged self-efficacy and franchise empowerment to transform the moving industry, while Kleinfeld motivated workers through job security and financial incentives to increase productivity. The analysis highlights how different applications of the same motivational frameworks produced organizational success in distinct industries.
This paper examines the motivation theories demonstrated in two business case studies: Mary Ellen Sheets' founding and growth of Two Men and a Truck, and Kleinfeld's leadership at Siemens. Both leaders applied foundational motivation frameworks to build high-performing teams and achieve organizational success in their respective industries.
Mary Ellen Sheets originally aimed simply to help her two sons expand their part-time moving business by attracting more customers. In doing so, she applied several of Maslow's motivational theories, including goal-setting theory, job enrichment theory, expectancy theory, and self-efficacy.
Sheets set a clear goal to help her sons and support their business venture. When she observed strong demand for a localized moving service, expectancy theory came into play—she believed that her service could meet customer needs. After her youngest child finished college, she committed fully to the business. Her expectancy was validated as her daughter, son, and others began purchasing franchises to launch their own operations.
Sheets demonstrated remarkable self-efficacy, believing she possessed the ability to create a successful moving franchise model and expand it effectively. By establishing job enrichment through opportunities for others to work and grow, she empowered employees at all levels. Her approach to building a high-performing team transformed the moving industry's reputation. She implemented comprehensive standards: requiring uniforms, charging customers by the hour rather than by weight, delivering pristine customer service, and providing extensive employee training. These practices ensured that her team members consistently went above and beyond for customers.
Kleinfeld of Siemens exemplified the same motivational theories applied in a different context: Maslow's needs hierarchy, goal-setting, expectancy theory, and job enrichment theory. Kleinfeld motivated his staff to work extended hours and weekends to meet the company's production demands and remain competitive in a challenging market.
Kleinfeld's approach was not immediately embraced, but he eventually won over his workers by connecting their efforts to tangible rewards. Workers realized that working additional hours directly translated to higher earnings and improved job security. This connection between effort and reward motivated employees to embrace the demanding schedule and commit to the company's competitive objectives.
Mary Ellen created a company and developed a high-performing, consistent, and hardworking team that remained motivated over time. She ensured that franchise owners and all employees were comprehensively trained, from initial customer contact through the final stages of each move. This emphasis on organizational culture and training created a sustainable competitive advantage based on service quality.
Kleinfeld encouraged his employees to work together as a unified team to accomplish their objectives. He recognized the threat of outsourcing and made clear to his workforce that consistent, dedicated effort during critical periods was essential to preserving their jobs and the company's viability. His motivation strategy was rooted in job security and survival—workers understood that their efforts directly prevented the outsourcing of their positions to other countries and secured their long-term employment.
"Contrasting strategies and shared theoretical foundations"
You’re 78% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.