Native American Discrimination: History, Bias, and Action
This paper examines discrimination against Native Americans across three interconnected parts. The first traces the history of prejudice from colonial times through modern-day stereotypes, exploring how policies of forced assimilation, boarding schools, and cultural erasure have contributed to ongoing social problems such as alcoholism and unemployment. The second part offers a candid personal reflection on unconscious bias and stereotypical thinking about Native Americans, tracing those attitudes to media imagery and limited formal education. The third part proposes an action plan grounded in cultural competency, education, and cognitive behavioral approaches to help reduce prejudice and support Native communities.
- History of Discrimination Against Native Americans: Colonial origins of anti-Native prejudice and policy
- Stereotypes and Their Colonial Roots: How early stereotypes shaped modern perceptions
- Forced Assimilation and Its Lasting Consequences: Boarding schools, cultural erasure, and unresolved grief
- Personal Reflection on Unconscious Bias: Author's candid self-examination of personal stereotypes
- Reassessing Stereotypes Through Education: How reading reshaped the author's views on Native culture
- Action Plan for Cultural Competency: Program goals for reducing prejudice in social work
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper moves coherently from historical context to personal reflection to actionable recommendations, giving it a logical three-part structure that builds on each section.
- The personal reflection section is unusually candid — the author openly acknowledges specific stereotypical images they hold, which models intellectual honesty and makes the self-examination credible.
- The action plan section translates abstract awareness into concrete program goals, demonstrating the bridge between theory and practice that social work education requires.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates effective use of reflective practice as an academic method. Rather than simply summarizing literature, the author applies scholarly sources (Lum, Koppelman & Goodhart, Freshman) directly to personal experience, then uses that self-analysis to generate policy-relevant recommendations. This technique — moving from theory to self-examination to application — is central to social work education and professional development.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized into three labeled parts: a historical survey of anti-Native American discrimination, a personal discrimination inventory, and an action plan for culturally competent social work practice. Each section is supported by the same core texts, creating internal coherence. The conclusion of each section feeds into the next, so the historical background informs the personal reflection, which in turn motivates the proposed interventions.
History of Discrimination Against Native Americans
Discrimination and prejudiced attitudes toward Native Americans stem back to colonial times, when colonists' living practices and governance policies did not adequately value "the culture, history and knowledge of the American Indians" (Koppelman & Goodhart, 2003, p. 86).
Colonists rarely acknowledged the indigenous peoples living in America when they first arrived. Many considered Native Americans to be savages — people who were less than human and dangerous at best (Koppelman & Goodhart, 2003). From early colonial times, a precedent was established that Native Americans were "obstacles" to be overcome rather than people deserving of equal rights and respect under the law.
There is evidence to suggest that early explorers such as Columbus appreciated the peaceful nature and beauty of the indigenous people, yet despite this he took many back to Spain as slaves (Koppelman & Goodhart, 2003). Though the indigenous people offered much to the colonists — including well-established roads upon which colonists eventually built their own systems — they were rarely acknowledged for their contributions.
Benjamin Franklin is even cited as noticing the impressive governance structure utilized by Indian nations and is noted for borrowing heavily from them, though he did not acknowledge the contributions or Indian influence on his work and was publicly prejudiced against the natives (Koppelman & Goodhart, 2003, p. 88). There is much the colonists might have learned had they paid closer attention. Native Americans, for example, had much to offer in the way of food and medicine, and were well known for their understanding of the value of medicinal plants.
Stereotypes and Their Colonial Roots
In modern times, Native Americans remain victims of prejudiced attitudes. Many people still hold the idea that Indians are either noble savages who lived long ago and were exterminated, or view Indians as people living in contemporary society who have lost their culture and been "degraded" by "white men's ways" (Koppelman & Goodhart, 2003, p. 95). Native Americans in contemporary times have also been criticized for operating casinos, which may potentially provide them with significant revenue.
Many indigenous people today face issues with forced assimilation into the "dominant society," which includes struggling with high unemployment rates, low school completion rates, domestic abuse, and alcoholism (Koppelman & Goodhart, 2003, p. 97). Many scholars suggest that Native Americans have not had the opportunity to "adequately mourn the events that happened to ancestors," and that their unresolved grief lies at the heart of their current social problems (Lum, 2003, p. 203). Alcohol is often seen as a tool of oppression and a way to "cheat indigenous people out of their land and natural resources" (Lum, 2003).
Already a member? Log in
Unlock the rest of this paper
135,000+ research papers · AI writing tools · Plagiarism & AI detection
7-Day Pass
Does not renew
Get 7-Day PassMonthly
Renews at $12.99/month until canceled
Start MonthlyAnnual
Renews at $99/year until canceled
Start Annual- Unlimited AI writing tools
- Plagiarism and AI text detection tool
Plan details
Unlimited AI writing tools are for individual, non-automated use and are subject to our Terms of Service and abuse-prevention measures.
TextChecker scans: 3 during the 7-Day Pass, or 5 per month with Monthly and Annual.
Prices exclude applicable tax.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.