Natural Resources: Economic Value and Sustainable Development
This paper examines natural resources from an economic perspective, arguing that a country's prosperity depends on the optimal and sustainable use of its resource base. Drawing on Peace (1997), Porter, and the UK Sustainable Development Commission (2003), the paper explores how environmental and social costs are frequently excluded from commercial calculations — particularly in industries such as commercial fishing. It outlines the UK government's sustainable development framework, which calls for placing sustainability at the center of all decision-making, recognizing nature's intrinsic and economic values, ensuring equitable resource use, and establishing clear accountability for environmental damage through transparent cost analysis and accounting systems.
- Introduction: Natural Resources and Economic Growth: Resources as drivers of national economic prosperity
- Environmental Cost Accounting: Hidden social and environmental costs in resource industries
- Moral Dimensions of Nature Degradation: Ethical responsibility and compensation for environmental harm
- UK Sustainable Development Framework: UK commission linking growth to sustainable resource use
- Principles of Sustainable Resource Management: Four policy principles for balanced resource governance
- Works Cited: Sources cited in MLA format
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds abstract economic concepts in a concrete industry example — commercial fishing — illustrating hidden environmental costs in an accessible way.
- Integrates multiple authoritative sources (Peace, Porter, UK Sustainable Development Commission) to build a coherent, multi-perspective argument.
- Moves logically from the problem (resource exploitation without full cost accounting) to a policy solution (the UK sustainable development framework), giving the paper a clear argumentative arc.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of policy document analysis combined with scholarly citation. Rather than simply summarizing sources, it applies them to a central argument — that natural resource management must incorporate environmental, social, and ethical values alongside commercial ones. The structured list of policy principles drawn from the UK Sustainable Development Commission (2003) shows how to translate regulatory guidance into analytical content.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by establishing the economic importance of natural resources, then identifies a gap: environmental and social costs are routinely ignored. It develops this gap using the fishing industry example, adds a moral dimension via the sustainable development framework, and closes with four specific policy principles from the UK Sustainable Development Commission. The Works Cited section follows MLA formatting conventions throughout.
Introduction: Natural Resources and Economic Growth
Natural resources hold significant value in a country's economic growth. In general, a nation's economic prosperity depends on its optimal effort to utilize natural resources properly and convert them into multiple forms of profit. Countries typically benefit from the diversity and maximum — yet responsible — exploitation of their resources. Natural resources provide direct benefits through raw and processed materials used as trade commodities, through the use of those resources as the medium of economic activities, and through leasing resources to other parties, which generates additional income for the country in the form of taxes, lease fees, and service charges.
Even when a country enjoys an extraordinary supply of natural resources each year, it is important that society maintains the sustainability of those resources. With appropriate stewardship, resources can provide the community with living space, a high-quality environment, and the fulfillment of citizens' needs for generations across an unlimited time span.
The UK government has brought this issue to the fore and is seriously implementing the sustainable development concept in its decision-making processes. The commercial value of a natural resource material is not the only factor in determining how people should exploit that material and profit from it. Resources carry exclusive values that interrelate with economic, political, and ethical factors. During the development process, such values often collide with one another, causing inconsistency in the system and endangering nature itself. If the government fails to provide a balanced regulatory system for natural resource management, those resources will ultimately serve only the interests of certain parties.
Peace (1997) underlines the important function of the accounting system in calculating the value of natural resources. Unlike other characteristics of physical, infrastructural, or general economic development, natural resource management carries a significant risk of damage that must be estimated in monetary terms.
Environmental Cost Accounting
Porter explains that countries often neglect the need for subsidies to cover social and environmental costs. In the fishing industry, for example, prices should cover not only the extraction cost and production cost, but also the damages that commercial ships cause during major fishing seasons. Commercial fishing companies frequently begin operations without accounting for losses from destroyed habitat, decreased fish stocks, and the recovery time required for nature to restore stocks to levels available for the next generation. Sometimes recovery takes years and may not proceed normally due to degrading water quality caused by pollution and physical damage. This is precisely where environmental cost calculation must take place.
Moral Dimensions of Nature Degradation
Nature degradation caused by human activities carries moral weight and collides with society's social responsibility. Within a sustainable development framework, accountants should measure the economic value of environmental damage, including the risk that damage poses to the surrounding community and habitat in the years that follow. This method should correctly measure how a person or corporation ought to compensate society for the harm created, including payment for losses incurred during remediation and cleanup. Armed with this information, investors can evaluate how their investments align with both political and social liability (Peace, 1997).
UK Sustainable Development Framework
The UK Sustainable Development Commission (2003) calls for a positive correlation between economic growth and sustainable development. According to a 2001 survey of public attitudes to quality of life and to the environment, concern about the environment and pollution ranked only seventh among the most important factors affecting quality of life, behind money, health, crime, employment, neighborhood, transport, and housing. This finding indicates that development must sufficiently address the community's basic needs across all these factors, boost economic growth, and simultaneously maintain the quality of the natural environment for future generations.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.