Nature, Identity, and Monstrosity in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
This paper examines Mary Shelley's Frankenstein through close reading of key passages, focusing on three interlocking themes: social rejection and the construction of monstrosity, the creature's desire for companionship, and Shelley's use of nature as a literary device. The analysis explores how society's perception of physical difference shapes identity, how shared suffering does not necessarily guarantee romantic compatibility, and how Shelley employs nature — through metaphor, setting, and symbolism — to reflect Victor Frankenstein's psychological state. The moon's recurring appearance is identified as a foreshadowing device tied to the creature's emergence throughout the novel.
- Society, Appearance, and the Making of a Monster: How social perception transforms difference into monstrosity
- The Creature's Search for Companionship: Creature's desire for a mate and shared suffering
- Nature as Metaphor and Victor's Psychological Refuge: Victor's compulsive reliance on nature for stability
- Foreshadowing Through Weather and the Moon: Moon and storm imagery as foreshadowing devices
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds each analytical claim in direct textual evidence, quoting Shelley and engaging closely with specific passages before offering interpretation.
- The personal voice adds authenticity — the writer honestly disagrees with the creature's logic about shared suffering guaranteeing romantic compatibility, which demonstrates independent critical thinking rather than passive summary.
- The identification of the moon as a recurring foreshadowing symbol tied specifically to the creature's appearances shows attentive, pattern-based reading of the novel.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates reader-response criticism combined with close reading. The writer does not simply paraphrase plot; they articulate an emotional and intellectual reaction to each passage, then build an interpretive argument from that reaction. This technique is especially effective in literary analysis at the undergraduate level, where personal engagement with a text is expected to serve as the foundation for a defensible claim.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with thematic analysis of two numbered quotations addressing monstrosity and the desire for companionship, then transitions to a dedicated section labeled "Quotes and Literary Terms Explained," where two additional passages are analyzed for their use of nature imagery and foreshadowing. Each section moves from quotation to interpretation to broader thematic conclusion, creating a consistent analytical pattern throughout.
Society, Appearance, and the Making of a Monster
One of the most painful truths about humanity is that so many people are shallow and empty. Countless individuals face the fear of not fitting in and dread going against the grain. In Frankenstein, the creature was born a freak of nature — something that people are instantly repulsed by. It would not matter if he were a good and kind person, because society would not view him as a person at all.
He is a monster. Monsters are, for lack of a better word, reviled. Society views monsters as evil, as less than human. When this reality is made clear — that no one was like him, that he was utterly unique and different — it suggests that because of his differences, he would instantly become defined and marred by what he is. Figures in old stories painted ugly things as evil and pretty things as good. This is no different. To the people who encounter the creature, he is a monster, an evil thing that lurks through the night. When he came to that very realization himself, it inspired a deep and profound sadness — a recognition that society is sometimes the true ugly monster, not the creature.
The Creature's Search for Companionship
Much like the first passage, a second key moment in the novel confirms how humans treat what they view as monsters. Since the creature views himself as a monster, he wants a mate who is equally monstrous and unlike the normal world. He understands just how impossible his condition makes life among ordinary people. He therefore seeks to be with a soul similar to his own — one who would automatically understand what it means to be different, to be that reviled "blot" upon the world.
He believes that because she will know his suffering, they will be able to understand each other and thus be compatible. This reasoning, however, is not entirely convincing. Shared experience can link people, but it does not always translate into romantic connection. In essence, a true mate should understand you regardless of what you look like. Common ground is not a prerequisite for romantic feeling to spark. It may make things easier, but it is not an automatic guarantee. The female creature would not be obligated to accept him simply because she, too, is a monster.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.