This paper examines the role of the state in advancing global neoliberalism and its consequences for marginalized populations in developing nations. Drawing on peer-reviewed and scholarly literature, the paper analyzes the possibilities and barriers that neoliberal policies create for genuine long-term sustainable human development, with particular focus on South Africa and Paraguay. It surveys the objectives, strategies, and achievements of social movements challenging land dispossession and economic exclusion, as well as the institutionalized barriers those movements face. The paper also considers state-led development models that run counter to the neoliberal agenda, including South Africa's Growth, Employment and Redistribution Strategy (GEAR) and Cuba's participatory political structures. The conclusion finds that marginalized peoples continue to face deeply entrenched structural obstacles despite sustained collective action.
The paper demonstrates effective use of direct quotation integrated with analytical commentary. Rather than letting quotes stand alone, the author consistently frames each citation within a broader argument, connecting evidence from disparate sources — NGO reports, legal rulings, and policy documents — into a cohesive narrative about structural inequality.
The paper follows a classical review-and-analysis structure: an introductory framing section is followed by three substantive analytical sections organized thematically (neoliberal barriers to development, social movement strategies, and counter-neoliberal state models). Each section builds on the last, moving from macro-economic critique to grassroots responses to state-level counter-forces. A brief conclusion synthesizes the key findings without introducing new material.
One of the harsh realities of life in the 21st century is that the vast majority of the world's population continues to struggle to survive in the face of dwindling arable land and governmental policies that constrain rather than promote economic development. This paper reviews the relevant peer-reviewed and scholarly literature to explain why some theorists have maintained that the state continues to be a central agent that facilitates the advancement of global neoliberalism. The discussion covers the rationale supporting this position, including an analysis of the possibilities and barriers that neoliberalism creates for genuine long-term sustainable human development, the objectives, strategies, and achievements of social movements as well as the barriers they face, and state-led models of development that run counter to the neoliberal agenda. A summary of the research and important findings is provided in the conclusion.
With a majority of the world's population still engaged in agriculture, many of the nationwide problems encountered in developing and newly industrialized countries — such as South Africa — represent a significant barrier to genuine long-term sustainable human development. For instance, according to the South African Association for Rural Advancement, "Around the world the poorest of the poor are the landless in rural areas. They make up the majority of the rural poor and hungry, and it is in rural areas where the worst poverty and hunger are found" (The emergence of the landless people's movement in SA, 2002, p. 5).
These disturbing trends are occurring during a period when agricultural technology has helped defy Malthusian predictions that world population growth would soon outpace the ability of the world to feed itself. The fundamental problem, it seems, is the manner in which this agricultural technology is being applied in countries such as South Africa. In this regard, the South African Association for Rural Advancement emphasizes that "the expansion of agricultural production for export, which is controlled by wealthy elites who own the best lands, continually displaces the poor to ever more marginal areas of farming" (2002, p. 5).
Indeed, already struggling farmers in South Africa have been increasingly compelled to resort to subsistence farming on unsuitable land, creating a vicious cycle of impoverishment. As the South African Association for Rural Advancement points out, "As they fall deeper into poverty, and despite their comparatively good soil management practices, they are often accused of causing environmental degradation" (The emergence of the landless people's movement in SA, 2002, p. 5).
Likewise, the organization War on Want (n.d.) reports that "the majority of black South Africans still live without land. The roots of this inequality lie in the country's history of colonialism and racist apartheid policies, but it is now exacerbated by the policies of the IMF and World Bank" (Landless in South Africa, para. 2).
Apartheid may be a thing of the not-so-distant past, but its legacy remains firmly in place in many parts of South Africa, especially with respect to agricultural lands. For example, Cox (2005) reports that "stock theft, farm murders, arson and illegal land occupation characterize relations between Africans and white farmers over significant parts of the country" (p. 1). While economic development remains a high priority for the South African government, there is comparatively less emphasis on forging truly sustainable human development. As Cox points out, "The background to this includes: a highly racialized distribution of land ownership rooted in the country's colonial past; a land reform program which has raised African expectations; and failures to implement that program" (2005, p. 1).
In most cases, the objectives of social movements concern gaining a fair share of national resources or reclaiming resources that have been taken from them. The strategies employed range from formal legal petitions to direct action. For instance, in a petition to the South African Parliament, Pilane (2004) reports that it is the position of the landless peoples of South Africa that they have a fundamental right to have their voices heard concerning the direction of the country's agricultural policies. According to Pilane, "The landless people of South Africa . . . should be given a chance to raise our concerns about the pace of land reform in South Africa" (2004, para. 1).
In other cases, the strategies used by disadvantaged peoples include actively interceding on their own behalf. For instance, Dougherty (2014) cites the predicament faced by the Indigenous people of Paraguay due to the illegal confiscation of their lands by the Paraguayan government. According to Dougherty (2014), these people "have been living precariously on the side of a highway in Paraguay's remote Chaco region for more than 20 years, ever since a German cattle rancher and the Paraguayan state illegally kicked them off of their ancestral lands" (para. 2).
Notwithstanding a decision by the Inter-American Human Rights Court in 2006 that found the Paraguayan government responsible for this transgression, the court ordered only the return of a small percentage of the land to these people (Dougherty, 2014). Despite this ruling, the Paraguayan government was either unwilling or unable to effect the return of even that fraction of the original lands, and the Sawhoyamaxa Indigenous community was compelled to resort to reclaiming the land on their own (Dougherty, 2014).
The research showed that marginalized peoples around the world are confronted with institutionalized and historic constraints to development that remain firmly in place despite longstanding efforts to resolve them. The research also showed that in many instances, people are coming together to challenge these barriers to social and economic development and, in some cases, have managed to achieve modest successes. In the final analysis, it will require more time and sustained challenges of these types in order to overcome the intransigence of many developing-nation governments and compel them to take the steps needed to ensure an equitable distribution of national wealth and resources.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.