This paper examines the problem of sexist language in English and argues for the adoption of non-sexist writing practices. It traces the roots of male-biased language to historical cultural norms and contends that contemporary society's commitment to gender equality demands a shift in how we write and speak. The paper offers three practical guidelines: avoiding male pronouns for persons of unspecified gender, reconsidering the use of "man" when "human" is more accurate, and treating women as individuals rather than extensions of men. The author frames non-sexist writing not as a rigid ruleset but as a flexible guide toward linguistic equality.
English is a remarkably rich language, containing thousands of words capable of conveying vastly different concepts. Language is powerful in the sense that it can convey ideas and emotions and ultimately influence the mind and heart of the reader or listener. However, language can also contain words used to insult, discriminate, or belittle people. We therefore have the responsibility to use language carefully so that we do not inadvertently convey offensive ideas.
The English language has long been riddled with terms biased toward the male members of society. This may have been a product of the cultural norms of past generations. However, contemporary culture treats men and women as equals, and this is precisely why promoting non-sexist language has become so important. We want to discourage language that emphasizes the superiority of one sex over the other, since such language promotes discrimination.
There are several established suggestions for developing non-sexist writing. These include using the term "human" instead of "man," using "person" in place of "-man" (e.g., chairman → chairperson), and using a generic pronoun rather than defaulting to "he" for unspecified genders. Sometimes it is difficult to follow these conventions due to long-established usage. The following proposals are intended to help writers promote non-sexist writing without the need to memorize a rigid set of rules:
1. If a term refers to a person of undetermined gender, avoid using a male pronoun. For example, "A doctor should give his best treatment to every patient" becomes "A doctor should always give the best treatment to every patient."
2. If a term makes use of the word "man," re-evaluate whether it refers to a human being in general or specifically to a male, and then use the appropriate term. For example, "Man is good by nature" becomes "A human is good by nature."
3. If a sentence refers to a woman as an extension of a man — for example, Mr. John Roberts and his wife — give emphasis to both persons as individuals: Mr. John Roberts and Mrs. Linda Roberts. This principle also applies to terms such as "female doctor" (use "doctor" instead) and "actress" (use "actor" instead).
"Guidelines framed as flexibility toward gender equality"
You’re 84% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.