This paper examines two foundational documents in research ethics: the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki. It outlines the ten core principles of the Nuremberg Code designed to protect human research subjects, including the requirements for voluntary consent, risk minimization, and the right to withdraw. The paper then analyzes how the Declaration of Helsinki expands upon these principles by introducing informed consent provisions, guidance on proxy consent for vulnerable populations, and additional standards for clinical research that combines medical care with experimentation. Together, these documents represent the ethical framework governing the use of human subjects in research.
Ethical codes are essential to human research, and it is the responsibility of those conducting research to uphold them. Two of the most important documents governing the ethical treatment of human research subjects are the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki. Each document identifies principles that researchers are obligated to follow in order to ensure that human subjects are protected throughout the research process.
The Nuremberg Code identifies ten elements necessary for ethical research involving human subjects. The first requirement is that voluntary consent must be obtained directly by those conducting the research; this responsibility cannot be delegated to another party. Experiments should be based on the results of prior animal experimentation and must be conducted so as to avoid any unnecessary suffering or injury.
No experiment should be undertaken if there is reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur. The degree of risk involved must never exceed the humanitarian importance of the problem being studied. Adequate preparations should be made in advance to protect subjects as much as possible. Experiments should be conducted only by scientifically qualified individuals. During the experiment, the human subject must be free to halt participation at any time. Finally, the researcher must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any point if there is cause to believe that continuing could result in harm to the subject.
These principles may seem like general common sense, but without their explicit articulation in a formal code of ethics, many researchers might overlook or undervalue their importance. When humans are used as research subjects, an elevated degree of caution is required. Many things can go wrong during research experimentation, and potential harms must be minimized as much as possible. Where risks cannot be eliminated entirely, subjects must at the very least be fully informed of those risks before agreeing to participate.
The Declaration of Helsinki shares much in common with the Nuremberg Code but significantly expands upon it, addressing more issues in greater detail. One important addition is a dedicated section on informed consent. While the Nuremberg Code does not directly address research involving subjects who are unable to provide informed consent, the Declaration of Helsinki does, asserting the ethical acceptability — under certain circumstances — of what is known as proxy consent.
Another significant expansion is the recognition that some, if not all, medical research is combined with medical care. In response, the Declaration establishes a distinct set of principles for this type of work, commonly referred to as clinical research. These additions reflect a more comprehensive effort to anticipate the range of situations researchers may encounter and to provide guidance accordingly.
The expansion of the code of ethics that deals with human subjects in research is a positive development. There can never be too many rules and regulations in place when it comes to using humans in experiments. Every possible avenue should be considered in the effort to keep human subjects safe during the research process. These additions to the code do precisely that, addressing the many safeguards necessary to protect individuals who participate in research experiments.
You’re 94% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.