This paper examines two interconnected dimensions of professional nursing practice. The first section analyzes the risks nurses face when acting as patient advocates, including emotional attachment, potential conflict with physicians and family members, and the challenge of balancing personal investment with patient autonomy. It also identifies benefits such as personal fulfillment and improved patient outcomes. The second section describes the characteristics of nursing employment settings that operate outside collective bargaining agreements, exploring why some nurses prefer individual advocacy over union representation, and discussing the drawbacks of union membership including dues, strike obligations, and financial hardship.
When nurses become advocates for their patients, they risk a great deal. They can alienate the family, the physicians, and other members of the staff by pushing too hard to keep a dying patient alive, to obtain tests that are not truly necessary, or to demand more than others are obligated to provide — simply because the nurse is not ready to let go of that patient or believes that he or she is not receiving adequate care. An emotional attachment can form, and while nurses are expected to care for their patients, caring too deeply does not solve problems and may actually create more difficulties for the patient and his or her family, as well as for other people in the hospital.
It is unfortunate that this happens, but it is part of the reality for professionals who regularly see sick and dying children, elderly people wasting away without families to say goodbye to them, and patients of all ages who cannot access what they truly need because they lack insurance. The American Nurses Association recognizes that advocacy is a core nursing value, yet the emotional weight it carries can blur the line between professional support and personal overinvestment. Understanding where that line falls is essential for every practicing nurse.
Despite the risks, there are times when a nurse benefits significantly from acting as an advocate for a patient. A sense of having genuinely helped someone is deeply important, as is the gratitude a nurse might receive from the patient, from family members who wanted to be present but could not, and from physicians or other hospital staff who are extremely busy and might have overlooked something critical had the nurse not brought it to their attention.
Whether to act as an advocate for a patient is a nuanced decision, and it is one that nurses must weigh carefully. They want to do everything they can for their patients, but they must also recognize that the patient may hold different wishes — such as an elderly patient who wants to die with dignity rather than be kept alive by machines. In cases like these, there are real benefits for nurses who are able to help patients complete advance directives that honor those wishes. As patient advocacy continues to be defined and refined within healthcare systems, helping people navigate both life and death remains one of the most meaningful roles a nurse can fill.
Collective bargaining, which is carried out through unions, is generally considered beneficial by many workers, but there are some healthcare settings where nurses choose not to participate in collective bargaining agreements or union membership. These employment settings are typically characterized by nurses who have a strong affinity for their work and who feel they would do the job even without compensation — or at least, that is the spirit with which they approach it. In other words, these nurses believe they are doing what is right for their patients, and that is what matters most to them.
Many of these nurses have financial obligations at home and understand the value of their paychecks. However, they prefer to be compensated based on the merits of their individual performance rather than because a large group negotiated collectively on their behalf. Whether a nurse experiences unfair treatment or unfair pay, they believe, should be a matter for that nurse to address personally — not for a collective to decide on behalf of many individuals in similar situations. This philosophy of individual professional responsibility shapes the culture of these non-union settings.
"Financial and personal costs of union membership"
You’re 73% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.