Nursing Curriculum Change and Accreditation Planning
This paper addresses two interconnected challenges faced by a university School of Nursing: managing the logistical difficulties of transitioning to a new integrated curriculum while simultaneously preparing for national re-accreditation. The new curriculum, grounded in phenomenology, humanism, and feminism with a community-based focus, triggers a clinical placement conflict when a 50% enrollment increase causes two cohorts to require placements on the same units simultaneously. The paper evaluates scheduling and staffing alternatives, considers curriculum redesign implications, and outlines a structured accreditation preparation plan using a Total Program Systematic Evaluation Plan (TPSEP) framework, identifying key evaluation components and strategies for overcoming assessment obstacles.
- Introduction to the Curriculum Transition Challenge: New curriculum creates conflicting clinical placement demands
- Logistical Considerations for Clinical Placements: Key logistical factors stakeholders must address
- Alternatives and Implications for Faculty and Clinical Personnel: Scheduling and staffing solutions with workforce implications
- Curriculum Redesign Recommendations: Stakeholder involvement and administrative planning advice
- Preparing for Nursing Program Re-Accreditation: Steps and framework for accreditation readiness
- Evaluation Components, Obstacles, and Solutions: TPSEP components and strategies to overcome barriers
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper clearly identifies a concrete institutional problem — conflicting clinical placements — and systematically works through practical alternatives, grounding each in its implications for faculty and students.
- It connects two distinct nursing education challenges (curriculum transition and accreditation) into a coherent administrative analysis, demonstrating breadth of program-management thinking.
- The use of a named evaluation framework (TPSEP) gives the accreditation section specificity and credibility, showing awareness of real institutional tools used in nursing education administration.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied problem-solution reasoning in an educational administration context. Rather than presenting theory abstractly, it anchors each recommendation to a specific logistical or accreditation scenario, then weighs implications for stakeholders — a technique commonly used in nursing education case analyses to translate curriculum theory into actionable administrative decisions.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized into two major thematic halves. The first addresses the clinical placement crisis created by the curriculum transition, moving from problem identification to logistical considerations to alternative solutions and their implications, closing with curriculum redesign recommendations. The second half pivots to accreditation, outlining a step-by-step preparation plan, detailing the TPSEP evaluation components, and concluding with strategies to overcome common evaluation obstacles. References follow APA format throughout.
Introduction to the Curriculum Transition Challenge
A university School of Nursing has worked diligently to develop a new curriculum. Although the faculty examined the advantages of an upper-division nursing program, they decided to continue with their four-year integrated curriculum. This new curriculum is based on phenomenology, humanism, and feminism, with a strong focus on community-based nursing, while hospital-based practice remains a major component. The introduction of the new curriculum will be coupled with a 50% increase in class size — from 100 to 150 students. The faculty faces a significant problem with clinical placements in relation to phasing out the current curriculum and introducing the new one. Specifically, 100 fourth-year students and 75 second-year students will require clinical placements on the same units on the same days in the fall semester.
Logistical Considerations for Clinical Placements
In light of the problems with clinical placements that will be created by the implementation of the new curriculum, the Faculty of the School of Nursing needs to address several logistical considerations. These considerations will help in developing appropriate measures to avoid the conflict produced by phasing out the existing curriculum while introducing the new one. The logistical considerations include commitment by all stakeholders to the institution's mission and purpose of nursing education, the philosophical approaches and outcomes of the curriculum, sufficiency of personnel, and scheduling and phasing out the current curriculum (Iwasiw, Goldenberg, & Andrusyszyn, 2009, p. 269).
Alternatives and Implications for Faculty and Clinical Personnel
Because the problem with clinical placements could result in a 40% decrease in the number of family birthing rooms as a consequence of introducing the new curriculum, the faculty should consider various alternatives to address the situation. One alternative is for administrators in the School of Nursing to request scheduling for classrooms, laboratories, and practice areas before the commencement of the term in order to promote careful planning and allocation. Scheduling requests will be crucial for planning and implementing the new curriculum and phasing out the existing one, particularly given anticipated increased enrollments, budget limitations, and the development of new classrooms and buildings. The scheduling requests will support course planning and the orderly phase-out of the current curriculum.
A second alternative is for the faculty to consider hiring additional faculty members to assist with teaching. This would help ensure that placements for 175 students do not occur on the same units on the same days, thereby preventing a decrease in the number of family birthing rooms available.
Scheduling requests to facilitate course planning during the phase-out of the existing curriculum imply that students should expect significant changes to their timetables as part of ensuring that the clinical placement conflict is avoided. The faculty and clinical personnel will also need to work together in joint planning, which may include collaborating with personnel from other nursing institutions and programs. Hiring additional faculty to assist with teaching and prevent simultaneous placements carries its own implications. While this alternative will help ensure the existing faculty is not overstretched, the increase in personnel means the institution will need to strive for fairness in workload distribution.
References
Iwasiw, C., Goldenberg, D., & Andrusyszyn, M. (2009). Curriculum development in nursing education (2nd ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
"Total Program Systematic Evaluation Plan (TPSEP)." (2011, May 16). UT Health Science Center San Antonio. Retrieved from the University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio website: http://nursing.uthscsa.edu/about/administration/TotalProgramSystematicEvalPlan_May_16_2011.doc
Uys, L. R., & Gwele, N. S. (2005). Curriculum development in nursing: Process and innovation. New York, NY: Routledge.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.