Organizational Life Cycle: Managing Each Stage of Growth
This paper examines the organizational life cycle model, tracing how companies move through the stages of birth, growth, decline, and death, and identifying the distinct managerial challenges each stage presents. Drawing on Greiner's model of organizational growth, the paper explains how crises — including autonomy, control, red tape, and internal growth — are natural and necessary features of development. The paper also addresses how managers can respond to organizational decline by seeking renewal or restructuring, and how the eventual death of an organization calls for strategies focused on value recovery. Throughout, the paper emphasizes that management style must adapt continuously as an organization evolves.
- Introduction to the Organizational Life Cycle: Overview of life cycle stages and dynamic transitions
- Birth: Survival as the Primary Objective: Founding challenges and resource-driven survival
- Growth and the Greiner Model: Industry-driven growth rates and Greiner's framework
- Crises and Management Shifts During Growth: Types of organizational crises and managerial responses
- Decline and Organizational Renewal: Reversing decline through restructuring and innovation
- Death and the Final Managerial Challenge: Asset divestiture, bankruptcy, and shareholder value
- Conclusions: Managerial lessons across all life cycle stages
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper uses the life cycle metaphor consistently, making abstract management concepts accessible by grounding them in a familiar biological analogy.
- It integrates a well-established theoretical model (Greiner's growth curve) with concrete real-world examples such as Eastman Kodak and Coca-Cola, giving the argument both academic and practical weight.
- The paper maintains a clear, logical progression through each stage, so readers can follow the argument without losing track of where the organization stands developmentally.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of a single organizing framework — the organizational life cycle — to structure an entire analytical essay. Rather than treating each stage in isolation, the author draws connections across stages, noting, for example, how structures built during growth must be loosened during decline. This integrative approach shows how a theoretical model can serve as a unifying scaffold rather than just a reference point.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief framing of the life cycle concept and proceeds chronologically through four stages: birth, growth, decline, and death. The growth section is the longest and most detailed, incorporating Greiner's model and its crisis typology. Decline and death are treated together in one section before a summary conclusion that reviews the key managerial takeaways from each stage. References follow in APA format.
Introduction to the Organizational Life Cycle
Organizations are understood to move through several distinct stages in their life cycle, each with specific implications for management. The stages are, roughly, birth, growth, decline, and death, depending on which model of the organizational life cycle is used. While the details of each stage differ across models, the strategies required are distinct, and management must be able to identify each stage and respond accordingly. It could also be argued that the stages are dynamic rather than discrete, and that the passage from one stage to the next can occur gradually and incrementally — and that management can actively influence this process (Hanks, 2015).
Birth: Survival as the Primary Objective
The initial stage of organizational development is the birth stage. At this stage, the organization is founded, its purpose is identified, and it is given the resources needed to survive. The life cycle metaphor is particularly apt here, because — as with living beings — an organization's ability to survive and thrive is typically determined early in its existence. An organization with the necessary resources (capital, talent) will tend to do so, while organizations that occupy a specific niche within their environment are also more likely to survive. Organizations that serve no particular purpose, that compete directly against more established rivals for resources, or that simply lack the means to ensure their survival, will face the greatest challenges.
The organization must have a plan to ensure its survival alongside those very early stages of growth. This can be difficult, because survival often requires navigating trade-offs among scarce resources. The margin for error, as with young lifeforms, is smallest when the organization is youngest. There are simply more threats and greater vulnerabilities to overcome. Thus, at the birth stage, survival is the most critical objective and may consume a significant portion of managerial energy.
Growth and the Greiner Model
The growth stage receives substantial attention in discussions of the organizational life cycle. First, this is the point at which the organization's ultimate size and scope are usually defined. Second, growth is something most managers and investors actively seek, so understanding what drives it is important for anyone in business. Greiner's explanation of how organizations grow illustrates a couple of key points. One, the rate at which an organization can grow depends on the size and growth rate of its industry. If no man is an island, then no organization is either, and the external environment dictates much of what an organization is capable of — especially in its early years, when it has less capacity to influence its industry (Greiner, 1998).
Another facet of the Greiner model is that a number of crises typically occur along the way. Growth is not assumed to follow a smooth, upward-trending line. Instead, each organization in the course of its growth will face a series of tests; in meeting those tests, it will find solutions, and those solutions will facilitate further growth. The Greiner curve thus emphasizes not only that crises exist in growing organizations, but that they are a normal and indeed essential part of such growth (Manktelow, 2015). For managers working in a growing organization, this is critical knowledge — they must not only anticipate such challenges but ideally build the company around the expectation that these challenges will arise and that overcoming them is part of the growth pathway leading to bigger things.
References
Greiner, L. (1998). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved July 23, 2015 from https://hbr.org/1998/05/evolution-and-revolution-as-organizations-grow
Hanks, S. (2015). The organization life cycle: Integrating content and process. Journal of Small Business Strategy. Retrieved July 23, 2015 from http://libjournals.mtsu.edu/index.php/jsbs/article/viewFile/218/201
Manktelow, J. (2015). The Greiner curve. MindTools.com. Retrieved July 23, 2015 from http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_87.htm
Smith, K., Mitchell, T., & Summer, C. (1985). Top level management priorities in different stages of the organizational life cycle. Academy of Management Journal, 28(4), 789–820.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.