Essay Undergraduate 1,125 words

Best Practices for Supporting Virtual Teams in Global Organizations

~6 min read 6 sections Business · Management

Abstract

This paper examines best practices for supporting virtual teams in multinational and global enterprises. It identifies five key issues IT departments face when supporting virtual teams, outlines an architectural framework for document and software collaboration, and enumerates five advantages and disadvantages of virtual team use. The paper also addresses challenges related to IT/IS national standards, protocols, and conflict-resolution procedures. A compare-and-contrast analysis of virtual and traditional teams focuses on communications, technology use, and team diversity. The paper concludes that while virtual and traditional teams share some common needs, virtual teams demand specialized human resource support, robust communications infrastructure, and culturally sensitive leadership practices.

Key Takeaways

Introduction: Context, definitions, and paper overview
IT Department Issues in Supporting Virtual Teams: Five IT challenges virtual teams create for departments
Advantages and Disadvantages of Virtual Teams: Five pros and five cons for global enterprises
Challenges: IT/IS Standards, Protocols, and Procedures: Handling standards, compatibility, and conflict resolution
Virtual Teams vs. Traditional Teams: Key differences in communication, tech, and diversity
Conclusion: Summary of findings and leadership implications

✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾

What makes this paper effective

Uses a clearly structured format with labeled sections, numbered lists, and defined categories (advantages, disadvantages, challenges), making a broad topic accessible and scannable.
Grounds practical recommendations in cited academic and professional sources, lending credibility to claims about human resource policies, conflict resolution, and technology requirements.
Balances descriptive content (what virtual teams are) with prescriptive content (how challenges should be handled), giving the paper both analytical and applied value.

Key academic technique demonstrated

This paper demonstrates effective use of compare-and-contrast organization to distinguish virtual teams from traditional teams across multiple dimensions—communications, technology use, and team diversity. By first establishing shared characteristics and then systematically identifying differences, the author avoids oversimplification and presents a nuanced evaluation appropriate for a business or technology management course.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with a definition and context-setting introduction, then moves sequentially through five IT support issues, an architectural diagram reference, a numbered list of advantages and disadvantages, a three-part challenge analysis (IT/IS standards, protocols, procedures), and a compare-and-contrast section. A brief conclusion synthesizes key findings. This linear, section-by-section organization is well suited to business and technology writing where clarity and scannability are priorities.

📘 Read the full essay guide → Build your outline → Generate a thesis → Generate citations → 📚 More Management examples →

Essay 1,125 words

Introduction

About half of all multinational corporations already use virtual teams in some capacity, and current trends indicate that they will become increasingly commonplace in the future (Minton-Eversole, 2012). Although definitions vary, virtual teams are typically regarded as groups of individuals located in different geographic locations who communicate primarily through collaborative electronic communications platforms (Minton-Eversole, 2012). Given their growing importance, identifying best practices for supporting virtual teams has assumed new relevance today.

To this end, this paper examines five issues that IT departments are likely to face in supporting virtual teams, along with an architectural diagram depicting how virtual teams collaborate and access common documents, software, and development and testing facilities. A description of five advantages and disadvantages of using virtual teams for global enterprises is followed by a discussion of how various challenges can be addressed. Finally, proposed procedures for virtual teams and a compare-and-contrast analysis of virtual and traditional teams with respect to communications, technology use, and team diversity are presented, followed by a summary of key findings in the conclusion.

IT Department Issues in Supporting Virtual Teams

First and foremost, virtual teams composed of qualified and talented individuals must be capable of responding to internal and external customer demands (Bergiel & Bergiel, 2009). Therefore, virtual teams require the appropriate types of synchronous and asynchronous communications and collaboration technologies needed to achieve their objectives despite differences in geographic location and time zone (Bergiel & Bergiel, 2009).

In addition, virtual teams require specialized human resources support. Duarte and Snyder (2006) emphasize that "human resource policies should support working virtually. Systems must be integrated and aligned to recognize, support, and reward the people who work on and lead virtual teams" (p. 11). Ensuring that all team members have access to compatible, reliable technology platforms is another persistent challenge for IT departments. Equally important is establishing consistent information security protocols across geographically dispersed team members who may operate under different national IT standards.

An architectural diagram illustrating how virtual teams collaborate and access common repositories for documents, software, development, and testing facilities is provided in Appendix A.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Virtual Teams

The use of virtual teams in global enterprises offers a number of meaningful advantages:

Advantages:

1. Reduced travel time; 2. Increased productivity; 3. Flexibility; 4. Cultural diversity of membership that can improve the team's deliverables; and 5. Lower costs compared to traditional teams.

However, virtual teams also present several notable disadvantages that organizations must carefully consider:

Disadvantages:

1. Cross-cultural differences that can adversely affect the quality of communications between team members; 2. Different time zones that introduce challenges in coordinating a mutually acceptable time for synchronous communications; 3. Diminished work-life balance for team members; 4. A lack of opportunities for team members to meet in person and learn about each other's personal and professional interests, specialized skills, experience, and expertise; and 5. Problems experienced by individual team members may not be easily discernible by the team leader until they reach serious levels.

2 Sections Hidden · 275 words

Challenges: IT/IS Standards, Protocols, and Procedures120 words

Information technology (IT) and information security (IS) standards have been established by the Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) and provide a useful framework within which the respective national standards of each virtual team member can be aligned, including the U.S. Federal Information Processing Standards (What ITL does, 2017). Organizations supporting virtual…

Virtual Teams vs. Traditional Teams155 words

Although there are some fundamental differences between virtual and traditional teams, both share common features, including the need for collaborative teamwork (Jones & Graham, 2015), effective conflict management methods, and the achievement of their respective objectives (Duarte & Snyder, 2006). These similarities, however, are countered by a number of significant differences,…

View Full Document

Conclusion

Virtual teams share some similarities with traditional teams, but the research shows there are far more differences involved — most especially the lack of opportunities to meet with other team members face to face, their different geographic locations and time zones, and a high level of dependence on IT resources for team communications.

The research also showed that virtual teams require specialized human resource support and the synchronous and asynchronous communications resources needed to achieve their objectives. By recognizing the differences involved in forming and leading virtual teams, team leaders can improve the effectiveness of their teams and achieve their objectives more efficiently.

References

Bergiel, B. J., & Bergiel, E. B. (2009, July 1). The reality of virtual teams. Competition Forum, 4(2), 427–431.

Duarte, D. L., & Snyder, N. T. (2006). Mastering virtual teams: Strategies, tools, and techniques that succeed (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Gern, S. (2013, May–June). Virtual teams versus traditional teams: A review of literature. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 11(2), 1–4.

Jones, N. B., & Graham, C. M. (2015, March). Virtual teams in business and distance education. Journal of Business and Economic Policy, 2(1), 49–53.

Minton-Eversole, T. (2012, July 19). Virtual teams used most by global organizations. Society for Human Resource Management. Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/organizational-and-employee-development/pages/virtualteamsusedmostbyglobalorganizations,surveysays.aspx

What ITL does. (2017). Information Technology Laboratory. Retrieved from https://www.nist.gov/itl/about-itl

Key Concepts in This Paper

Virtual Teams IT Support Cross-Cultural Differences Asynchronous Communication Team Collaboration Conflict Resolution IS Standards Geographic Distribution Team Diversity Remote Leadership