This essay examines the concept of originality and its role in academic writing, copyright, and intellectual ownership. It argues that while true originality may be philosophically questionable, the legal and ethical frameworks surrounding authorship serve a necessary social function. The paper discusses how plagiarism operates in academic contexts, distinguishing between intentional misconduct and culturally conditioned misunderstandings. Drawing on a UK study of Greek and Chinese students, it illustrates how differing cultural norms around citation and authorship can lead to unintentional plagiarism. The essay concludes that upholding clear standards of originality benefits both academic integrity and student motivation.
When you speak or write, do you own the words you have created? What about the thoughts that preceded those words? These questions point to a deeper issue: what is originality?
In some sense, we are all "original authors." We compose our own ideas and transmit them to the world in speech. Yet it is equally easy to argue that because our words result from a series of subtle cultural influences, there is no truly "original" thought. Even the greatest scientific innovations of earlier eras built upon the ideas of those who came before. Shakespeare borrowed most of his plots. The notion of someone who exists entirely outside of culture is a fiction. Even the language we speak shapes and limits our conception of the world.
However, although originality may be a fiction, it is a necessary fiction. Without copyright laws, authors would have no incentive to create new ideas. The ability to "own" a song, a creative work, or a patent on a new invention encourages people to generate creative products and enables them to profit from the fruits of their labor.
While there may be no truly "new" ideas, when an idea is reconfigured and reimagined in a striking fashion, it acquires a quality of originality that justifies the author's claim upon it as his or her own special creation. "Just as Apple didn't make the first computer, Facebook was not the first social media service, and Google was not the first search engine. These people were inspired by something, had a passion for it, and wanted to make it better."1
Even in everyday workplace settings, this principle holds. In a sales department, when an associate comes up with a "new" marketing idea, that person expects to be given credit and would be very offended if a colleague claimed authorship. The social expectation of credit for one's ideas is nearly universal, and copyright law formalizes that expectation in legal terms.
Within academia, ownership of one's ideas is a particularly essential construct. Like artists and inventors, academics must profit from their ideas, and stealing someone's creative output is tantamount to stealing his or her livelihood. The most obvious example of unethical theft in this context would be a professor claiming the words or research of another academic as his own in a journal article or book, and then profiting from its publication.
When a student uses the words and ideas of someone else without correctly citing the quotes or paraphrases, this is called plagiarism — another form of stealing. Although a student does not financially profit from his or her words, the professor awards a grade. People assume the student is the original author and has a right to claim the grades — and the subsequent degree earned from those grades — as the student's own output.
However, while there are some clear-cut examples of cheating, not all instances are black and white. For example, certain facts considered to be "common knowledge" do not need to be cited, but what constitutes common knowledge varies from discipline to discipline.2 In general, it is better to cite than to be sorry.
"Cultural norms cause unintentional plagiarism in students"
"Valuing originality boosts student engagement and honesty"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.