Economic Impact of the Palliative Care and Hospice Education Act
This paper examines the projected economic impact of the Palliative Care and Hospice Education and Training Act, a legislative proposal aimed at improving training and support for clinicians working in palliative care. While the bill carries an estimated cost of $50 million over five years, the author argues that this represents a sound long-term investment. Drawing on peer-reviewed studies from the Archives of Internal Medicine and Health Affairs, the paper demonstrates that palliative care consultation teams generate substantial per-admission savings at the hospital level, and that better-educated clinicians can improve clinical outcomes, advance directive adoption, and cost containment both locally and nationally.
- Introduction: Bill overview and core economic argument
- Cost Savings Through Improved Palliative Care Quality: Hospital savings from palliative consultation teams
- Advance Directives and End-of-Life Cost Reduction: How better nurse education reduces end-of-life costs
- Consultation Training and Medicaid Savings: Medicaid savings from New York State hospital data
- Conclusion: Long-term fiscal case for passing the bill
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds its policy argument in concrete quantitative evidence — citing per-admission and per-day cost savings drawn from peer-reviewed journals, which makes the economic case tangible and credible.
- Maintains a clear cost-benefit framing throughout: the $50 million investment is explicitly weighed against projected long-term savings, giving the reader a logical structure to follow.
- Connects macro-level policy goals (the bill's passage) to micro-level outcomes (individual hospital savings, advance directive adoption), demonstrating that the student understands both dimensions of healthcare economics.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses selective quotation effectively — embedding specific dollar figures from cited studies rather than paraphrasing vaguely — to substantiate a policy recommendation. This technique anchors opinion-driven arguments in verifiable data, a foundational skill in policy and health-economics writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an overview of the bill and its core economic logic, then builds its argument across three evidentiary paragraphs: the first cites hospital-level savings from palliative consultation teams; the second addresses advance directives and preventive care efficiency; the third draws on Medicaid data from New York State hospitals. A single references entry closes the paper. The argument flows linearly from premise to supporting evidence without digression.
Introduction
This paper examines the economic impact upon the nation if the Palliative Care and Hospice Education and Training Act were passed. Fundamentally, the economic impact of the bill would ultimately be a positive one. The bill proposes the necessity for better training and support for the clinicians who will ultimately work in palliative care. The bill represents a long-term investment: greater expenditure to better train and educate professional healthcare personnel, with the understanding that definitive savings will be substantial.
Cost Savings Through Improved Palliative Care Quality
There is almost always a substantial amount of fiscal savings when the quality of care is improved; this has been demonstrated in a range of studies and is experienced at both the local and national level. For instance, according to a study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine, it was discovered that when consultation teams were implemented in palliative care settings, the savings were significant (2008). The study concluded that palliative care patients discharged alive had an adjusted net savings of $1,696 in direct costs per admission and $279 in direct costs per day. Palliative care patients who died in the hospital had an adjusted net savings of $4,908 in direct costs per admission and $374 in direct costs per day. For an average 400-bed hospital containing an interdisciplinary palliative care team seeing 500 patients a year, net savings to the hospital would amount to $1.3 million per year (ascan.org). While the estimated cost of the bill would be $50 million over five years, the long-term savings would eventually prove worthwhile within ten to twenty years.
References
Ascan.org. (n.d.). Evidence-based research: Cost savings of palliative care to hospitals and the Medicaid program. Retrieved from
Already a member? Log in
Unlock the rest of this paper
135,000+ research papers · AI writing tools · Plagiarism & AI detection
7-Day Pass
Does not renew
Get 7-Day PassMonthly
Renews at $12.99/month until canceled
Start MonthlyAnnual
Renews at $99/year until canceled
Start Annual- Unlimited AI writing tools
- Plagiarism and AI text detection tool
Plan details
Unlimited AI writing tools are for individual, non-automated use and are subject to our Terms of Service and abuse-prevention measures.
TextChecker scans: 3 during the 7-Day Pass, or 5 per month with Monthly and Annual.
Prices exclude applicable tax.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.