Enhancing Palliative Care Delivery in U.S. Healthcare
This paper examines how palliative care can serve as a cost-effective alternative to aggressive acute care within the U.S. healthcare system, with particular attention to rural community hospital settings. Drawing on a study by McGrath et al. (2013), the paper reviews the financial and demographic evidence comparing palliative and aggressive treatment approaches for patients with life-threatening or life-limiting conditions. It discusses the physical, spiritual, and psychological dimensions of palliative care, the role of advanced practice nurses in rural delivery, and key findings — including net savings of $273 per day for patients receiving palliative care. The paper also acknowledges study limitations related to data collection and logistics.
- Introduction: The Case for Healthcare Innovation: Rising costs drive demand for innovative U.S. healthcare
- End-of-Life Care and the U.S. Healthcare System: Aggressive acute care dominates end-of-life spending
- Palliative Care: Principles and Practice: Palliative care reduces suffering and treatment costs
- Study Purpose and Methods: Community hospital study comparing care cost dynamics
- Critique: Benefits and Challenges of Palliative Care: Evidence shows savings but data challenges existed
- Conclusion: Palliative care offers viable alternative to aggressive treatment
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds its argument in concrete financial data — the $2.5 trillion federal healthcare expenditure and the $273-per-day savings figure — giving the analysis measurable stakes.
- The paper moves logically from the macro problem (rising U.S. healthcare costs and an aging population) to a focused clinical solution (palliative care in rural community hospitals), maintaining a clear thread throughout.
- The inclusion of a study critique section, acknowledging both benefits and methodological limitations, demonstrates balanced academic reasoning rather than one-sided advocacy.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses evidence-based critique: it identifies a primary study (McGrath et al., 2013), summarizes its design and findings, and then evaluates both the strengths and the weaknesses of the evidence. This technique — situating a single empirical study within a broader policy context — is a core skill in health sciences writing at the undergraduate level.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a policy-level introduction establishing the financial and demographic pressures on U.S. healthcare. It then narrows to end-of-life care settings before defining palliative care and its clinical components. A brief methods section describes the study design, followed by a two-part critique covering benefits and challenges. The paper closes with a conclusion linking palliative care outcomes to broader healthcare reform goals.
Introduction: The Case for Healthcare Innovation
Any rehabilitative and chronic care system aims at cost-effective healthcare. The move toward considering alternative methods of providing healthcare for patients stems from federal spending of over $2.5 trillion in 2010 — a figure representing 17.6% of the nation's gross domestic product. An aging American population has created demand for an innovative and creative patient healthcare delivery system. This new system promises to provide quality healthcare in a cost-effective manner that includes end-of-life care.
End-of-Life Care and the U.S. Healthcare System
Currently, the U.S. healthcare system primarily focuses on the provision of aggressive acute care for patients admitted to inpatient facilities. Close to 80% of the budget spent in the final months of patients' lives covers costly aggressive treatments, resuscitation efforts, and ventilator support. Despite the expense of this care, patient outcomes did not improve; instead, it increased patients' physical and emotional suffering. In light of these statistics, the pursuit of quality-of-life options has sought to utilize less costly and less aggressive treatments.
Palliative Care: Principles and Practice
Palliative care focuses primarily on relieving pain and suffering for patients who experience life-threatening or life-limiting illnesses. The population considered to fall under these two illness brackets covers a variety of ages and diagnostic categories. Patients living with recurrent or persistent conditions represent a significant group, as they experience conditions that may affect both their life expectancy and daily functioning.
The program involves identifying and addressing patient burdens across physical, spiritual, and psychological dimensions of illness. Key aspects of high-quality palliative care include effective communication during transition processes, preparing the patient and family for the death of a loved one, and exploring hospice options. Through these activities, both the patient and family benefit from a focus on improving quality of life. Palliative care also helps eliminate expensive treatments such as diagnostic imaging, intravenous antibiotics, and daily laboratory studies. In rural areas, researchers recommend the use of an advanced practice nurse (APN) in facilitating low-cost palliative healthcare services.
Conclusion
Implementation of the palliative healthcare system positively influences significant changes in medical and nursing practices. The critical success factors — cost-effectiveness and longer patient lengths of stay — demonstrate the significance of this system as a viable alternative to traditional aggressive treatment methods. Effective palliative healthcare services also address the financial needs of individuals, particularly those in rural areas who may not be able to afford expensive, aggressive methods of healthcare.
Reference
McGrath, L. S., Foote, D. G., Frith, K. H., & Hall, W. M. (2013). Cost effectiveness of a palliative care program in a rural community hospital. Nursing Economics, 31(4), 176–183.
Already a member? Log in
Unlock the rest of this paper
135,000+ research papers · AI writing tools · Plagiarism & AI detection
7-Day Pass
Does not renew
Get 7-Day PassMonthly
Renews at $12.99/month until canceled
Start MonthlyAnnual
Renews at $99/year until canceled
Start Annual- Unlimited AI writing tools
- Plagiarism and AI text detection tool
Plan details
Unlimited AI writing tools are for individual, non-automated use and are subject to our Terms of Service and abuse-prevention measures.
TextChecker scans: 3 during the 7-Day Pass, or 5 per month with Monthly and Annual.
Prices exclude applicable tax.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.