Decent Motives, Indecent Acts: Paradox in The Giver
This essay examines the central paradox in Lois Lowry's The Giver: that the most genuinely decent impulses of the novel's protagonists — Jonas and the Giver — are consistently interpreted as indecent by the community around them. Through close readings of key passages, the essay traces this contradiction across three moments: Jonas's desire to help women, which is misread as adolescent impropriety; Jonas's plan to restore collective memory and protect Gabriel, which would be viewed as a transgression; and the sanctioned permission to lie that accompanies the supposedly virtuous role of the Giver. Together, these paradoxes expose Lowry's underlying critique of the society's Utopian pretensions and its fundamentally dystopian character.
- Introduction: The Paradox of Decent and Indecent: Central paradox of utopia vs. dystopia introduced
- Jonas's Desire to Help and Its Misinterpretation: Jonas's helpful impulses misread as sexual impropriety
- Escaping Society to Restore Memory: Jonas's escape plan: decent motives, indecent consequences
- The Role of the Giver and the Paradox of Lying: The Giver's virtuous role permits morally indecent lying
- Conclusion: Three paradoxes unified as critique of dystopian society
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The essay anchors each analytical point in a direct textual quotation, allowing the argument to grow organically from the source material rather than from summary alone.
- The central organizing concept — the paradox of decent motives deemed indecent — is stated clearly in the introduction and then demonstrated consistently across three distinct examples, giving the essay a tight thematic coherence.
- The paper layers two related paradoxes (decent/indecent and utopia/dystopia) in a way that shows how character-level tension mirrors society-level contradiction, adding analytical depth beyond plot summary.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The essay demonstrates close reading with embedded quotation: each body paragraph introduces a passage from the novel, quotes it directly with page numbers, and then unpacks its implications for the broader argument. This technique grounds interpretation in evidence and models the standard literary analysis move of "quote, then explain."
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a classic five-part structure: an introduction establishing the paradox and thesis, three body paragraphs each built around a quoted textual example (Jonas's bathing desire, his escape plan, and the Giver's license to lie), and a brief conclusion that restates how each example supports the central claim. At roughly 700 words, it is concise and well-proportioned for a short literary analysis essay.
Introduction: The Paradox of Decent and Indecent
The paradox at the heart of Lois Lowry's The Giver is that the decent inclinations of the primary characters are often contextualized and viewed as indecent by the surrounding community. This observation is most clearly visible in the dialogue, thoughts, and actions of Jonas, as well as in those of the character known as the Giver. The natural proclivities of both characters are understandable, particularly given their special talent and their charge within the community — which is to preserve all memories that have existed within that community in order to spare other residents the burden of pain and discomfort that the evocation of those memories would inevitably create. Lowry sets up this paradox, however, to readily demonstrate how what some might regard as a Utopian society is actually a Dystopian one — which is, of course, yet another paradox that exists within this literary work for children (Babbitt, 1993).
Works Cited
Babbitt, Natalie. "The Hidden Cost of Contentment." Washington Post. 1993. Print.
Silvey, Anita. "Interview with Lois Lowry, Margaret A. Edwards Winner." School Library Journal. 2007. Web.
Ray, Karen. "Children's Books." New York Times. 1993. Web.
Campbell, Patty. "The Sand in the Oyster." Horn Book Magazine, 717–721. 1993. Print.
Hipple, Ted, and Amy B. Maupin. "What's Good About the Best." English Journal, 40–42. 2001. Print.
Flowers, Ann A. "The Giver." Horn Book Magazine, 458. 1993. Print.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.