Parent-Child Relationships in Buckler and Larkin
This essay compares Ernest Buckler's short story "The Harness" with Philip Larkin's poem "This Be the Verse" to examine how both works address the tensions inherent in parent-child relationships. Approaching the same theme from opposing perspectives — the child's in Larkin's poem and the father's in Buckler's story — the essay argues that, whether positive or negative, the generational relationship is a necessity. Children need parents to act as parents, and Buckler's protagonist Art is ultimately forced by his son David's provocative behavior to abandon a misguided friendship dynamic and fulfill his proper parental role.
- Introduction: Two Works, One Theme: Buckler and Larkin share a generational theme
- Larkin's Child's-Eye View of Generational Misery: Poem frames parent-child bond as negative cycle
- Buckler's Father Figure and the Friendship Experiment: Art treats David as equal, not child
- David's Provocation and the Breaking Point: David forces Art into a parental role
- Conclusion: The Necessity of Generational Roles: Both works affirm necessity of parent-child structure
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The essay frames its comparative argument clearly from the outset, identifying that both works treat the same theme from opposite narrative perspectives — child and parent — which gives the analysis a natural structural logic.
- Textual evidence is woven directly into each analytical point, with brief but well-chosen quotations from both Buckler and Larkin supporting the claims made.
- The concluding paragraph ties the two works together thematically around the word "harness," demonstrating how the title carries symbolic weight about the necessity of defined roles.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates comparative literary analysis — placing two texts in dialogue to illuminate a shared theme each approaches differently. Rather than treating the works separately, the essay uses each to shed light on the other, showing how Larkin's cynical child's-eye view and Buckler's sympathetic father's-eye view ultimately arrive at the same conclusion about the indispensability of generational structure.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with a clear comparative thesis, then devotes a paragraph each to Larkin's poem and Buckler's story before moving into a close reading of the story's key scene — the fence-mending episode and its aftermath. The conclusion synthesizes both texts under the essay's central claim. At roughly 500 words, the paper is tightly organized and avoids digression, making it a strong model for short comparative essays at the high school or introductory undergraduate level.
Introduction: Two Works, One Theme
Ernest Buckler's short story The Harness illustrates the same problem as Philip Larkin's poem "This Be the Verse," but from different sides. Both works deal with the tensions that arise between generations. In "The Harness," a father-son relationship is examined from the father's viewpoint, while Larkin's poem addresses the parent-child relationship from the child's point of view. Although they approach the subject from opposing angles, both works ultimately deal with the necessary bond between generations. Parents must act as parents, impacting the lives of their children in both positive and negative ways.
Larkin's Child's-Eye View of Generational Misery
Larkin's poem would have the reader believe that the parent-child relationship is entirely negative, as suggested by the aggressive language of its very first line: "They mess you up, your mum and dad" (Larkin). Yet Larkin also recognizes that the speaker's experience is part of a broader cycle that everyone must endure to some extent. It is all part of a grand, if terrible, pattern: "Man hands on misery to man. / It deepens like a coastal shelf" (Larkin). The poem is told from the perspective of a child who has already experienced the weight of that inheritance.
Buckler's Father Figure and the Friendship Experiment
Buckler's piece is more nuanced in that it is told from the perspective of a struggling parent who tries to navigate his relationship with his erratic son, David. This is established from the opening of the story, when the reader encounters the father's anxious self-questioning: "I'd get the awful feeling then that we were both lost. That whatever I'd done wrong had not only failed, but that he'd never know I'd been trying to do it right for him" (Buckler). The father, Art, has worked hard to build a relationship with his son by positioning himself as a friend rather than a parent. He even encourages David to call him by his first name.
Art sees David as a small adult, and at times David plays along, displaying remarkable reasonableness and generosity. "He could reason, as well as I. His body would seem to vibrate with obedience. His friendship would be absolutely unwithholding" (Buckler). Art struggles to fully understand his son until a day spent mending fences makes it unmistakably clear that this is a father-and-son relationship, not a friendship between equals. At first the day goes well — Art and David enjoy working together. However, Art's inability to see his son as a child sets the course of events that follow. He leaves David to wait near the skeleton of a dead horse. Like most seven-year-olds, David is frightened, and his father is gone for what must have felt like a very long time to a child.
Conclusion: The Necessity of Generational Roles
Art probably thought that he was doing the right thing by his son by treating him as an equal, but the parent-child relationship is a necessity for both generations. Someone has to be in control, and someone has to be, as the title suggests, harnessed. That may not always be a pleasant experience for either party, as Larkin's poem makes plain. Nevertheless, children need to be children just as adults need to be parents. The father in Buckler's story is ultimately forced into understanding this truth by the very actions of his son.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.