This paper examines the concept of parole within the U.S. criminal justice system, clarifying common misconceptions about how it differs from probation. It outlines parole's three core conceptual frameworks — grace, contract, and custody — and explains the typical standard and special conditions imposed on parolees. The paper also discusses the historical development of parole in the United States and analyzes the goals of truth-in-sentencing laws, including their effect on parole board authority and the proportion of prison sentences that convicted offenders must serve. Together, these elements illustrate how parole functions as both a rehabilitative tool and a mechanism for managing prison overcrowding.
The concept of parole has often been misunderstood because many people fail to distinguish it from probation. Parole has developed as a means of reducing prison overcrowding while rehabilitating prisoners by allowing them to secure their release through good behavior. The process of parole involves the supervision of a convicted offender after they have served part of their prison sentence and are permitted to live in the community under supervision. Because the parole period is typically determined by the recommendations and decisions of a parole board, any violation of its conditions is likely to result in the re-imprisonment of the offender.
There are three main functions of parole: reducing jail terms based on good behavior, supervising the offender during the parole period, and releasing individuals serving uncertain or indeterminate sentences.
Parole can be described as a concept that allows prisoners to serve the final portion of their sentences in the community under clearly defined conditions determined by the board of parole and enforced by a parole officer. The purpose of parole within the criminal justice system is to provide a means of conditional release from prison. However, parole does not release a convict from the legal custody of the state — it releases the person only from physical custody. In the United States, parole developed during the 19th century from various practices of conditional pardon in England, Australia, and Ireland.
Generally, parole consists of three major concepts — grace, contract, and custody — all of which are aimed at reducing jail overcrowding and rehabilitating the convict. The concept of grace holds that a criminal could remain incarcerated but that the government extends the privilege of release (Cole & Smith, 2006, p. 521). The concept of contract refers to an agreement between the government and the prisoner in which the criminal promises to adhere to specified conditions in exchange for release from imprisonment. The concept of custody holds that the convict remains the responsibility of the government even after being released from jail. This last concept reflects the understanding that parole is primarily an extension of correctional programs into the community.
Each parolee released from prison for community supervision is subject to certain conditions imposed upon release. These conditions are generally classified into two categories: standard conditions of parole and special conditions. While standard conditions consist of written rules that all parolees must follow, special conditions are additional written regulations unique to each individual parolee that are designed to enhance their chances of successfully completing parole.
The conditions affecting parole are largely standard and similar across many states, despite the fact that some states have parole boards while others have parole commissions. Although there are numerous differences in parole laws across states, several common provisions appear throughout the criminal justice system. Typical conditions include the requirement that the parolee report to a parole officer on a regular basis, restrictions on the parolee's area of residence, and limitations on or prohibition of contact with the victim (State Pardon and Parole Laws, n.d.). Additional standard conditions include the requirement that the parolee abstain from alcohol consumption and illicit drug use.
Before the enactment of truth-in-sentencing laws, convicted offenders rarely served their complete prison sentences. Most were released early either for good behavior or due to prison overcrowding. In such cases, parole boards had considerable discretion in releasing prisoners before they completed their sentences, and release was largely subject to probationary periods based on reviews of good behavior and the severity of the offense.
"How sentencing laws limit parole board discretion"
As criminal activity and prison overcrowding have increased, parole has emerged as a concept that promotes the rehabilitation of criminals while alleviating overcrowding. The process is grounded in distinct conceptual frameworks, shaped by various standard and special conditions, and governed by evolving legislation such as truth-in-sentencing laws.
You’re 72% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.