This paper examines the theme of patriarchy as depicted in Henrik Ibsen's A Doll's House and Susan Glaspell's Trifles. It analyzes how each work uses symbolism, character dynamics, and social critique to illuminate the subjugation of women within a "exclusively masculine" society. The discussion covers the doll house as a metaphor for female domestication, Torvald's patronizing treatment of Nora, and the systemic exclusion of women from financial and political power. The paper then turns to Glaspell's Trifles, arguing that it functions not as a murder mystery but as a feminist outcry against the constraints marriage and patriarchal norms impose on women's identities and happiness.
Ibsen's side note is a remarkably astute and honest appraisal of the realities of patriarchy. The statement was certainly true of Nora and her society. Even as she tries to negotiate some semblance of power in the domestic realm, the barriers to women achieving genuine political, financial, and social equality are too entrenched in the society to overcome.
The central theme of patriarchy is played out through the motif of the doll house itself, which serves as a metaphor for the domestication and subjugation of women in Ibsen's world. A woman is prevented from acting outside of her role in the domestic sphere. She cannot "be herself" in the way a man can — that is, she is not permitted to pursue whatever level of education she pleases or acquire professional credentials of her choosing. Women are beholden to men and become financially dependent on them, launched into careers of domestic servitude. They are also kept like children, treated in patronizing ways, as Torvald does with Nora. Torvald calls Nora a "child" throughout the play, and also uses disparaging names like "featherbrain" (Act III). The grouping of "women and children" that perpetuates itself throughout Western society shows that, in spite of great leaps in gender equity, Ibsen is still correct in saying society is "exclusively masculine." Although much has changed since Ibsen penned A Doll's House, too much remains the same.
In the play, stereotypes abound, showing how difficult it is to change gender roles and norms. For example, Krogstad refers to "a woman's overstrained sense of generosity" and implies an inability of women to comprehend complex or analytical issues such as finances. Women are systematically excluded from access to financial power, which is why Nora must take out the illicit loan. The fact that she succeeded in acquiring the money emasculates Torvald, which is precisely why Nora cannot "be herself." Instead of thanking her for her sacrifice, Torvald shuns her.
Ibsen also engages with the inability of women to "be herself" on a deeper level. This is more than just an allusion to the lack of power and authority a woman holds in society; it relates to how a woman's very identity is constrained by gender. The same can also be said of men, who are likewise damaged by the patriarchal social order in that it constrains their individuality as well.
"Trifles reframed as feminist critique, not whodunit"
"Marriage destroys Mrs. Wright's spirit and identity"
You’re 54% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.