This essay examines the central theme of patriarchy in Henrik Ibsen's A Doll's House and Susan Glaspell's Trifles, exploring how both playwrights use domestic settings and female characters to critique gender inequality. Through the metaphor of the doll house and the suppression of Mrs. Wright's identity, these works illustrate how patriarchal structures systematically exclude women from financial, political, and social power while constraining their sense of self. The paper argues that both plays function as social critiques rather than conventional drama—one as an appraisal of gender roles, the other as a feminist outcry—and that patriarchy damages not only women but also men by limiting individuality.
Ibsen's side note is a remarkably astute and honest appraisal of the realities of patriarchy. The statement was certainly true of Nora and her society. Even as she tries to negotiate some semblance of power in the domestic realm, the barriers to women achieving genuine political, financial, and social equality are too entrenched in the society. Ibsen recognized that A Doll's House existed in an "exclusively masculine" world, where women lacked agency across all spheres of public and private life.
The central theme of patriarchy is played out through the motif of the doll house itself, which is a metaphor for the domestication and subjugation of women. A woman is prevented from acting outside of her role in the domestic sphere. She cannot "be herself" in the way a man can, which is to say, permitted to pursue any level of education she pleases or acquire any type of professional credentials she would like.
Women are beholden to men and become financially dependent on them, as they are launched into careers of domestic servitude. They are also kept like children, treated in patronizing manners as Torvald does to Nora. Torvald calls Nora a "child" throughout the play, and also calls her disparaging names like "featherbrain" (Act III). The grouping of "women and children" that perpetuates itself throughout Western society shows that despite great leaps in gender equity, Ibsen is still correct in saying society is "exclusively masculine." Although much has changed since Ibsen penned A Doll's House, too much remains the same.
In the play, stereotypes abound, showing how difficult it is to change gender roles and norms. For example, Krogstad refers to "a woman's overstrained sense of generosity" and the inability of women to comprehend complex or analytical issues like finances. Women are systematically excluded from access to financial power, which is why Nora needs to take out the illicit loan. The fact that she succeeded in acquiring the money emasculates Torvald, which is why Nora cannot "be herself." Instead of thanking her for her sacrifice, Torvald shuns her.
Ibsen also refers to the inability of women to "be herself." This is more than just an allusion to the lack of power and authority the woman has in society. It relates to the identity of a woman being constrained by gender. When women are systematically denied education, professional opportunity, and financial autonomy, they are denied the foundational elements of selfhood and authentic identity.
If it seems Susan Glaspell's play Trifles is a lousy mystery, then it is because Trifles was not written to be a mystery at all. It is not a "whodunit" style of narrative, even though the plot is driven by the desire to know whether Mrs. Wright did the deed. Interestingly, the audience never knows fully whether Mrs. Wright did it or not. The playwright, and certainly many of the characters, want the audience to believe that Mrs. Wright killed her husband. But because the act itself happened prior to the rising of the curtain, there is no way of knowing whether the "evidence" against her is circumstantial and spurious or not.
Glaspell's play is a feminist one, filled with references to the need to subvert patriarchy in whatever means possible. Patriarchy has a literal and symbolic stranglehold over society. It chokes the ability of women to be happy, as the story of Mrs. Wright shows. The play is an outcry against gender inequity and injustice, not a murder mystery.
Her neighbors muse about the way Mrs. Wright used to be happy: "She used to wear pretty clothes and be lively, when she was Minnie Foster." This shows how marriage can kill the spirit of a woman. The transformation from Minnie Foster—vibrant, clothed in color, animated—to Mrs. Wright—drab, silent, diminished—represents the erasure of female identity under patriarchal control. What Glaspell depicts through Mrs. Wright's tragedy is the systemic destruction of women's joy, agency, and sense of self that occurs within a patriarchal marriage.
"Universal constraint on individuality and authenticity"
You’re 83% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.