This paper examines Ephesians 5:21–32, focusing on Paul's use of the marriage union as a metaphor for the relationship between Christ and the Church. While Paul employs the household codes of his patriarchal Mediterranean context, the paper argues that his primary purpose is to articulate Christian community, mutual submission, and Christ's sacrificial love — not to endorse the subjugation of women or the institution of slavery. Drawing on scholarship by MacDonald and Matera, the paper explores how preachers can engage this difficult passage honestly, using it as a springboard for discussions on social justice, evolving scriptural interpretation, and the universal ethical truths embedded in Christian teaching.
"Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ" (Ephesians 5:21). This sentence clarifies one of Paul's main objectives in outlining the household codes of Ephesians. Christ is the head of the Church, to which all Christians belong. However, Paul quickly shifts focus to the patriarchal marriage union to model Christian social norms: "Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything" (Ephesians 5:24). Paul therefore uses the household code partly as an opportunity to provide a "theological justification and motivation for the subordination of wives, children and slaves to the head of the household" (MacDonald, n.d., p. 341).
Yet somewhat mysteriously, Paul switches back again and states, "This is a profound mystery — but I am talking about Christ and the church" (5:32). Modern readers should not take Paul's message about marriage customs and gender roles at face value, but should pay close attention to the metaphor being constructed. Viewing the relationship between Christ and the Church as a marriage union helps strengthen social ties, without the moral turpitude that comes with patriarchal, slave-owning households. Unfortunately, Ephesians 5:21–32 has been taken out of context and misinterpreted to reinforce the subjugation of women and the practice of slavery.
Neither misogyny nor slavery have any part to play in Christian ethics. The passage has been historically weaponized to justify social hierarchies that conflict with the deeper values Paul seeks to promote. When read as a literal prescription for domestic life rather than as theological metaphor, the text enables precisely the kind of harm Paul's broader ministry was meant to overcome. Recognizing this misuse is the first step toward a more faithful reading of the text.
Matera (n.d.) suggests that preachers can work with this passage in several ways, beginning by frankly addressing it with their congregations. To directly confront its underlying assumptions is to show the congregation how their own lives might reflect lingering remnants of the patriarchal past. Preachers can therefore use the text as a springboard for discussion about social justice, ethics, and the importance of evolving social norms so that they align more perfectly with God's will.
"Strategies for addressing difficult texts in sermons"
"Christ's sacrifice and the Church's unity"
You’re 45% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.