Penelope as the Ideal of Greek Womanhood in Homer and Ovid
This paper examines Penelope as the archetypal model of aristocratic Greek womanhood in Homer's Odyssey, arguing that her craftiness, fidelity, and devotion mirror those of her husband Odysseus, both operating under the patronage of Athena. The paper then analyzes how Ovid's Heroides subverts this Homeric ideal through satire, recasting Penelope as a sexually frustrated, jealous, and anxious wife. By comparing the two portrayals, the paper illuminates how Roman literary culture engaged with and playfully undermined Greek epic tradition, and what each version reveals about ideals of femininity in the ancient world.
- Penelope and Odysseus as Complementary Greek Ideals: Odysseus and Penelope as paired ideal figures
- Penelope's Virtues: Hospitality, Weaving, and Fidelity: Penelope's wifely virtues and patient love
- Athena's Patronage and Penelope's Wily Stratagems: Athena's aid and Penelope's clever deceptions
- The Roman Reception: Ovid's Heroides and Satirical Reversal: Ovid's satirical reinterpretation of Homer's Penelope
- Ovid's Jealous Penelope: Subverting Every Homeric Expectation: Jealousy, sexual anxiety, and Homeric inversion in Heroides
- Conclusion: Satire, Tradition, and the Limits of Subversion: Ovid's wit as dependent on Homer's authority
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper uses close reading of primary texts, drawing on specific quoted passages from the Odyssey and the Heroides to support each analytical claim rather than relying on generalizations.
- The comparative structure is well-managed: the paper first establishes a clear positive model (Homer's Penelope) before showing how Ovid systematically inverts each element of that model, making the contrast vivid and persuasive.
- The paper situates both texts in their cultural contexts — Greek aristocratic values, Roman education, and Ovid's early satirical style — demonstrating that literary meaning depends on its social and historical setting.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates sustained comparative literary analysis across two ancient texts separated by centuries. It identifies a precise intertextual relationship — Ovid's dependence on the reader's prior knowledge of Homer — and shows how that relationship generates satirical meaning. This technique of tracing how a later text "reads against" an earlier one is central to classical reception studies.
Structure breakdown
The paper divides into two roughly equal halves. The first half analyzes Homer's Penelope through the lenses of Greek social virtues (hospitality, weaving, fidelity) and divine patronage (Athena), with textual evidence from the Odyssey. The second half turns to Ovid's first Heroides letter, tracing point by point how each Homeric virtue is inverted — fidelity becomes jealousy, craftiness becomes self-doubt, chastity becomes sexual frustration — culminating in a reflection on how Roman literary culture made Greek epic a vehicle for irreverent humor.
Penelope and Odysseus as Complementary Greek Ideals
One might think of Achilles, the hero of the Iliad, as the Greek masculine ideal. He triumphs over his enemies in an open, agonistic contest because he is a greater warrior than they. He shows the virtue of compassion when he finally yields Hector's body to Priam. Even Achilles's arrogance and his obsession with honor — his inability to deal with slights to his reputation — though they might seem repugnant to modern sensibilities, are clearly meant to elicit sympathy from Homer's audience. They might wish to act in the same way if they stood in his shoes.
Yet Odysseus, the hero of the Odyssey, presents an entirely different masculine ideal. He shuns glory because it brings responsibilities that are not really in his best interest. Though a brave and able fighter, he is "the man of many wiles" who triumphs because of his clever deceptions and strategies. Perhaps the author of the Odyssey, at least, considered his hero a superior character. While Achilles enjoys fleeting glory within the scope of the Iliad, he ultimately fails, being killed by a bow-shot from the feeble Paris before Troy is sacked. Odysseus, on the other hand, despite his many misfortunes, ultimately succeeds. It is through his trickery that Troy is taken and that he eventually makes it back home.
Another good reason for thinking of Odysseus as a masculine ideal is that his wife Penelope is unquestionably an ideal of Greek femininity. Penelope, however, succeeds through the same wily nature as her husband. Both ultimately share the same goal — the continuation, or even restoration, of their marriage and family — and both are protected by that most Greek of goddesses, Athena. Taken together, Penelope and Odysseus represent the ideals of the male and female spheres of Greek life. In Penelope, we are able to see all the characteristics of a model wife, mother, daughter-in-law, and queen. Unlike her, figures such as Alcmene or Megara helplessly need to be rescued by another suitor; other victims would have remarried; Atalanta tried to avoid marriage by testing her suitors.
Penelope's Virtues: Hospitality, Weaving, and Fidelity
Penelope's actions read like an etiquette book for Greek society. All of her problems arose because she obeyed the Greek rules of hospitality and accepted her suitors as guests. But she went beyond this and even treated beggars with hospitality while they were mocked by the suitors — supposedly noblemen. She was an ideal wife, mother, and queen. Above all, she remained faithful to her marriage, which even Odysseus could not do; but fidelity was more a wifely than a husbandly virtue in ancient Greece. She was patient and devoted to both her husband and son. Her faithfulness to her husband goes beyond the demands of social convention to a deep and abiding love:
Penelope listened with tears flowing down. / Her flesh melted — just as on high mountains snow melts away under West Wind's thaw, once East Wind blows it down, and, as it melts, the flowing rivers fill — that's how her fair cheeks melted then, as she shed tears for her husband, who was sitting there beside her. (Od. XIX.204–09)
Athena's Patronage and Penelope's Wily Stratagems
Athena favored Odysseus and his family. She guided the hero through the perils of his return and aided him through divine intervention in the massacre of the suitors. She guided his son Telemachus in the mortal disguise of Mentor (Od. II.255). Yet Athena was as much a helper to Penelope as she was to her son and husband. Toward the beginning of her story, Penelope invokes Athena according to the best Greek traditions, offering sacrifice and making a prayer, and reminding the goddess of her family's past service:
She placed some grains of barley in a basket and then prayed to Athena: "Untiring child of aegis-bearing Zeus, hear my prayer. If resourceful Odysseus in his home ever burned a sacrifice to you — plump cattle thighs or sheep — recall that now, pray. Save my dear son and guard him well from those suitors and their murderous pride." With these words, Penelope raised a sacred cry, and the goddess heard her prayer. (Od. IV.761–67)
The prayer for the salvation of her son is, of course, in essence a prayer for the salvation of the family, and it is one that the goddess answers, intervening to help Penelope just as she does Telemachus and Odysseus.
The most virtuous activity for women in Greek aristocratic households was weaving. Penelope acknowledges this when she says that if she shirked her weaving, she would become the subject of women's gossip throughout Greece (Od. XIX.146–47). Athena is the patron of weaving, as is demonstrated in one of her best-known myths, in which she transformed Arachne into a spider for daring to challenge her status as the greatest weaver. Accordingly, Penelope uses Athena's art as the basis of her wily stratagem. She fobs off the suitors for three years by telling them that she cannot marry until she fulfills a last duty to the family of her presumably dead husband:
"You young men, my suitors, since lord Odysseus is dead, you're keen for me to marry, but you must wait until I'm finished with this robe, so I don't waste this woven yarn in useless work. It's a burial shroud for lord Laertes, for when the lethal fate of his sad death will seize him..." (Od. XIX.142–45)
This is only a pretext, however, to buy time. She stretched the time out to three years by the device of unweaving each night what she had woven during the day:
"So every day I'd weave at the big loom. But at night, once the torches were set up, I'd unravel it. And so for three years I tricked Achaeans into believing me. But as the seasons came and months rolled on, and many days passed by, the fourth year came. That's when they came and caught me undoing yarn — thanks to my slaves, those ungrateful women." (Od. XIX.149–55)
There is a strong contrast here between the virtue of Penelope, who works to protect her family, and the betrayal of the maids, who have been corrupted by the suitors. They will later be executed for their treachery by Telemachus on Odysseus's orders. Penelope's trick of playing for time by unweaving at night what she wove during the day allows her to deceive and — at least temporarily — defeat the suitors whom she is not strong enough to directly engage. It is precisely the same, therefore, as the deceptions Odysseus used in contriving the Trojan horse and in his encounter with Polyphemus, which allowed him to overcome enemies too strong to defeat with mere force. Penelope and Odysseus both use the wisdom of Athena to overcome enemies rather than, for instance, the more aggressive style of Ares.
Penelope shows the same kind of craftiness in devising the archery contest for the suitors:
"I'll now organize a competition featuring those axes he used to set inside his hall, in a line, like a ship's ribs, twelve of them in all. He'd stand far off and shoot an arrow through them... I'll now set up this contest for the suitors. The one whose hand most deftly strings his bow and shoots an arrow through all twelve axes is the one I'll go with." (Od. XIX.571–75)
Similarly, Penelope uses a clever device to test the identity of her husband once he returns, questioning him about the details of their bedroom furniture that only he could know (Od. XXIII.178–230).
Penelope is the model of aristocratic Greek womanhood. She commands and protects her household and practices the prototypical virtues of hospitality and weaving. She protects her family and remains loyal to her husband. She accomplishes all these things in the same manner as her husband Odysseus — through the wily devices granted her by their patron goddess Athena.
Conclusion: Satire, Tradition, and the Limits of Subversion
The Heroides presents a satire of Penelope that perversely rereads her character as a burlesque of Homer's virtuous wife. Romans did not ordinarily view Greek epic in this satirical way. The Aeneid, for instance, is a notably humorless book. Though Ovid came to write more serious epic works, his early works were often lighthearted and humorous in their treatment of serious themes drawn from Greek literature. This eccentric view was nevertheless acceptable and popular in the Roman world because the immense influence of the Greek literary tradition and its importance in the educational system made it a ripe subject for satire. Ovid's frustrated and jealous Penelope is a sort of phantom called up from the text of Homer by the Roman poet's wit and irreverence rather than a serious new development of Penelope's tradition; she could have no existence or meaning apart from the reader's pre-existing knowledge of Homer's portrayal of Penelope.
Works Cited
Homer. Odyssey. Trans. Ian Johnston. 25 April 2008.
Marrou, Henri-Irenée. A History of Education in Antiquity. Trans. George Lamb. New York: Sheed and Ward, 1956.
Ovid. Heroides. Trans. A. S. Kline. 2001. 25 April 2008.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.