Essay Undergraduate 988 words

Personal Autonomy and Defining Suicide in Medical Ethics

~5 min read

Abstract

This paper addresses two related questions in medical and mental health ethics: the importance of a precise definition of suicide for clinical practice, and the limits of personal autonomy arguments regarding the right to end one's life. Drawing on the concept that suicide requires willful self-arrangement of one's death without outside pressure, the paper argues that an overly broad definition creates risks of inappropriate intervention. It then critically examines Joel Feinberg's autonomy-based argument in "Whose Life is it Anyway?" contending that his paralyzed-patient example is atypical and does not justify a general policy of permitting suicidal individuals to act on impulse without clinical intervention.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

▼

What makes this paper effective

It grounds an abstract philosophical debate in concrete clinical scenarios — terminally ill patients, drug users, extreme athletes — making the argument immediately practical and accessible.
It fairly represents Feinberg's position before critiquing it, acknowledging that his argument is valid within its own narrow example while demonstrating it cannot be generalized.
It uses the counterexample of acute crisis states (intoxication, sudden job loss, relationship breakdown) to challenge the assumption that suicidal individuals are exercising stable, autonomous judgment.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates conditional concession: the writer grants that Feinberg's autonomy argument works in a very specific, well-defined case (full paralysis with a stable medical prognosis), then systematically shows why those conditions rarely exist in typical suicidal presentations. This technique strengthens rather than weakens the overall critique by showing intellectual honesty before delivering the rebuttal.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens by establishing a working definition of suicide and explaining why definitional precision matters for frontline providers. It then moves through examples of edge cases — terminally ill patients, addicts, extreme athletes — to show the dangers of an overly broad definition. The second half pivots to Feinberg's philosophical argument, summarizes it accurately, and then applies a counterargument centered on the atypicality of his example and the clinical importance of treating impulsive, crisis-driven suicidality differently from considered end-of-life decisions.

Defining Suicide for Clinical Practice

According to the article "Suicide," an act of suicide is defined as an event in which "an otherwise healthy victim has, without any outside pressure, willfully arranged the circumstance that brought around his or her death." The process of clearly defining the circumstances and actions that constitute suicide is essential to medical providers, mental health workers, and many social service and public providers who are charged with caring for the health and safety of other individuals. Without a clear definition of suicide, it can be difficult — if not impossible — for these providers to fulfill their ethical and professional obligations to care for sick individuals or prevent crisis and emergency situations that may result from genuinely suicidal behavior.

Why Precise Definitions Matter for Providers

Doctors, nurses, social workers, and psychologists in health clinics, hospitals, and outpatient settings are expected to care for their patients and make efforts to safeguard their health and wellness. These providers are often required to protect suicidal patients from themselves when patients exhibit intent to cause self-harm. The process of treating such a patient becomes focused on stabilizing their behavior in order to resolve the deeper psychological or social issues triggering suicidal acts. If the definition of suicide or suicidal behavior is too broad, providers will be compelled to intervene and treat patients in situations where medical or mental health intervention is neither appropriate nor productive. If, for example, a patient is terminally ill, suffering in pain, and elects to refuse further treatment that may intensify or extend that pain, one could argue it would not be appropriate or productive for a clinician to complete an assessment or intervention for suicidal behavior.

Medical providers, mental health clinicians, and even public servants such as firefighters or police need to be given a clear and accurate definition of suicidal behavior in order to properly identify and prevent acts of self-harm. While one can argue that a depressed drug addict may be placing himself at risk by ingesting intoxicating substances, a doctor or psychologist will most likely not make a meaningful impact by using methods intended for suicide intervention if the individual has no intention to harm himself or end his life. In that case, such interventions are simply not applicable or appropriate.

Feinberg's Autonomy Argument

Another example is that of extreme athletes taking part in dangerous activities such as skydiving or bungee jumping. While a danger clearly exists with these activities, a doctor or therapist would likely want to explore this person's interest in high-risk activities and assess whether their behavior was functional or dysfunctional in the context of their life. Assuming that such a person is purposely seeking to harm himself could be a significant error, leading to improper treatment. Providers must therefore be given a very clear definition of what does and does not constitute suicide in order to guide their interventions and the practice of health and mental health services.

2 Locked Sections · 340 words remaining

Critiquing Feinberg's Example as Atypical · 190 words

"Why Feinberg's paralyzed patient is not representative"

Autonomy, Impulsivity, and Clinical Responsibility · 150 words

"Crisis states and limits of autonomy-based arguments"

You’re 48% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.

130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime

Key Concepts in This Paper

Suicide Definition Personal Autonomy Clinical Intervention Suicidal Behavior Mental Health Ethics Crisis State Feinberg's Argument Impulsivity Patient Rights Medical Responsibility