Skip to main content
Essay Undergraduate 1,700 words

Personal Theodicy: Why God Permits Evil in a Good World

~9 min read 5 sections Religion · God And Evil
Abstract

This essay presents a personal theodicy — a justification of divine goodness in the face of evil — grounded in Christian theology. Drawing on thinkers such as C. S. Lewis, John Feinberg, Fred Berthold, and N. T. Wright, the paper argues that evil exists as a consequence of free will granted to both angels and humanity, and as the lasting effect of Original Sin. The essay examines philosophical objections to God's goodness, addresses natural evil, and contends that God's continued involvement in the world — most fully expressed in the incarnation and sacrifice of Christ — demonstrates that divine goodness and justice are compatible with the existence of evil.

Key Takeaways
  • Introduction: The Problem of Evil and Divine Goodness: Defines theodicy and introduces Christ as God's answer
  • Free Will, the Fall, and the Origin of Evil: Original Sin and free will as sources of evil
  • The Philosophical Problem and the Role of Free Will: Feinberg and Berthold rebut Hume's skeptical objection
  • Natural Evil and the Consequences of the Fall: Natural disasters and suffering explained by the Fall
  • Conclusion: God's Justice, Love, and the Christian Answer: Christ reconciles divine goodness with existence of evil
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples

What makes this paper effective

  • The paper integrates multiple scholarly sources — Lewis, Feinberg, Berthold, Wright, and Sheen — to build a coherent theological argument rather than relying on a single authority.
  • It anticipates and addresses a core philosophical objection (Hume's skepticism) before rebutting it, strengthening the argumentative structure.
  • The writing moves logically from abstract theological principles to concrete examples (the Fall, Christ's crucifixion, natural disasters), grounding the argument in both doctrine and lived experience.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates effective use of theological synthesis: it draws together patristic thought (Augustine via Berthold and Burns), modern Christian apologetics (Lewis, Sheen), and contemporary biblical scholarship (Wright) to construct a unified response to a classic philosophical problem. This shows how interdisciplinary sources can be marshaled to support a single thesis without contradiction.

Structure breakdown

The essay opens by defining theodicy and establishing the thesis that evil results from free will and Original Sin. It then introduces C. S. Lewis's framing of Christianity as a catastrophic historical event and Christ as God's direct answer to evil. Next, it engages the philosophical objection raised by Hume and rebuts it using Feinberg and Berthold. A dedicated section addresses natural evil as a consequence of the Fall. The conclusion synthesizes the argument, affirming that God's justice and love are revealed most fully through Christ.

Essay 1,700 words

Introduction: The Problem of Evil and Divine Goodness

Theodicy is the vindication or justification of divine goodness in spite of the evidence of a world where evil exists. When one has faith in the divine goodness of God, the question of why God allows evil things to happen is not particularly troublesome; it is when one has no faith, or has doubts, that the question becomes pertinent. It is therefore helpful to explain how and why a good God would allow evil to exist and evil things to befall innocent people, so that others might come to believe, or might come to believe more strongly.

The main reason for the existence of evil is that God gave to men — and to the angels — freedom of will. Men and angels were given the choice, in other words, of whether they would serve Him or their own desires. The fallen angels (led by Lucifer, now known as Satan) chose to serve themselves, and thus became antagonists to God and all His creation. The first created man and woman (Adam and Eve) also chose to deny God His legitimate claim to their hearts, minds, and wills by breaking His commandment not to eat the forbidden fruit. In that moment, they sinned and brought the knowledge of good and evil to mankind,1 passing the effects of sin onto their children, as Paul writes to the Romans: "Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned" (Romans 5:12). Evil was thus introduced into earthly paradise by way of man's disobedience and God's just punishment of that sin.

Today, man must combat not only his own weak will and desire to serve self over God, but also the temptations of Satan, who seeks to destroy man's relationship with God. This is the root of evil — and God permits it because He wants man to have a free will to choose Him. Love that has no choice in the matter is not truly love.2 This essay argues that all evil is permitted as an effect of Original Sin and is allowed by a good God because, in the end, man's mind and heart are meant to be reminded that God alone is their home, refuge, and eternity, should they but choose to reach out to Him.

Free Will, the Fall, and the Origin of Evil

C. S. Lewis puts it best when he says that to ask whether the world was made by a loving God or by an indifferent God is to ask the wrong question and to ignore the drama of the entire Old and New Testament, which explains the matter fully. Christianity, Lewis states, "is a catastrophic historical event following on the long spiritual preparation of humanity."3 It is catastrophic because it so upended the world that humanity has seen fit ever since to mark its days by the birth of Christ. Christ came to directly deal with the problem of pain and sin, and the evidence of this is found throughout Scripture.

Christ heals the blind and the sick and raises loved ones from the dead. He offers Himself on the cross to the Father so that the sins of mankind might be forgiven. He asks forgiveness of those who persecuted Him and inspires humility in others — such as the good thief who asks to be with Christ in the next world, moved to contrition by God's charity toward others. Christ is the reminder, Lewis argues, that to dwell too long on the problem of pain and evil is to imagine that God did not care about mankind — which is simply not true. God does care, and the evidence is Christ. Divine goodness exists and is available to all; one must only acknowledge that one is a sinner who depends upon God's mercy, and then make the act of faith. As Lewis demonstrates throughout The Problem of Pain, the incarnation is itself the definitive theological answer to the question of divine indifference.

2 Sections Hidden · 450 words
The Philosophical Problem and the Role of Free Will220 words
As Feinberg points out, "the theological/philosophical problem of evil is about the existence of evil in general, not some specific evil that someone encounters which disrupts her personal relation with God."4 The idea of evil in the abstract is what people find difficult to reconcile with the idea of a good God in the abstract — just as Hume, the philosophical skeptic, found it difficult to do. The problem that people facing this difficulty encounter is that they…
Natural Evil and the Consequences of the Fall230 words
But what does that say about the occurrence of natural evil — sadness, death, typhoons, floods, tornadoes, and the like? Why does nature itself seem to be full of a malevolent…

Conclusion: God's Justice, Love, and the Christian Answer

The reason God allows so much evil to exist in the world is that He is both just and good. God has given His intelligent beings the choice to love or reject Him. He respects their choice and allows them to live with the consequences. Rather than simply annihilating His creation, He allows their evil and tolerates it. That evil does not come from Him but from themselves. He suffers it — He Himself suffered it by being crucified on the cross. God is not indifferent: He sees, knows, and understands. He still wants men to choose Him out of love, because He loves them.

That is the reason God allows so much evil to exist: He knows that even out of evil some good can come — some souls will realize that evil is not their end, but rather that God wants them to be with Him. Evil is not there because God hates men and the world, but rather because He gave free will, and those who rejected God had to bear the consequences of that rejection, so that they might realize the gravity of their sin and come to know the goodness of God. Sin, death, evil, pain, natural evils — these are all effects of sin, and Christ came to help men overcome sin. The solutions and ways forward are there; all man must do is cease imagining that God does not care. God does care, and that is what the Christian mysteries reveal. To understand how and why God can allow so much evil to exist, one must understand the Christian religion. Christ is at the heart of the answer — as Lewis argues again and again. Without a sense of Christ, one cannot obtain a satisfactory answer to the problem of why so much evil exists in the world today.

Bibliography

Berthold, Fred. "Free Will and Theodicy in Augustine: An Exposition and Critique." Religious Studies 17, no. 4 (1981): 525–535.

Burns, J. Patout. "Augustine on the Origin and Progress of Evil." The Journal of Religious Ethics (1988): 9–27.

Feinberg, John S. The Many Faces of Evil. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 2004.

Lewis, C. S. The Problem of Pain. Quebec: Samizdat University Press, 2016.

Sheen, Fulton. Life of Christ. New York: Image Books, 2008.

Wright, N. T. Evil and the Justice of God. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2006.

Key Concepts in This Paper
Theodicy Free Will Original Sin Divine Goodness The Fall Natural Evil Redemption Christ's Sacrifice Problem of Pain Augustine
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Personal Theodicy: Why God Permits Evil in a Good World. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/personal-theodicy-god-permits-evil-2173309

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.