This paper examines three criminal justice scenarios involving a police officer responding to a suspected domestic violence call, a judge determining a fair sentence, and a prosecutor deciding whether to offer a plea bargain in a sex offense case. Each scenario highlights the discretion available to criminal justice professionals and the legal, ethical, and practical considerations that guide their decisions. Drawing on sources from Cornell University Law School and epidemiological research on unreported domestic violence, the paper illustrates how law enforcement and court actors must balance victim safety, public protection, rehabilitation, and procedural fairness in real-world situations.
In this scenario involving what may be an instance of domestic violence, the officer has the option of simply talking to the couple, determining what is wrong, and issuing a warning — or pressing charges against both or one of the participants for disorderly conduct. The police officer can use his or her presence to influence the couple's behavior, or can invoke the actual weight of the law. The officer will have to rely on his or her perceptions of the relationship between the couple as well as the information the couple offers.
As part of the assessment, the officer should speak to both members of the couple separately to determine whether one or more participants is at risk of suffering further physical violence. The officer should also determine whether alcohol or drugs are potentially involved, as substance use can impair the participants' judgment. It should be noted that the couple indicating that everything is fine — and the woman refusing to accuse the man — should not end the investigation. Quite often in domestic disputes, the woman's desire to conceal the crime is itself one of the symptoms of being a victim of domestic abuse. As Gracia (2004) notes, "most of the cases of domestic violence are unreported. That is, reported cases of domestic violence against women represent only a very small part of the problem when compared with prevalence data."
A judge passing sentence should take into consideration the following factors: the nature and circumstances of the offense, and the history and characteristics of the defendant; the need for the sentence imposed to protect the public and prevent the defendant's recidivism; the need for future deterrence; and the need to provide the defendant with rehabilitative treatment — such as in the case of a defendant who has an addiction problem and could benefit from drug treatment (Imposition of a Sentence, 2014, Cornell University Law School).
"When and why prosecutors offer plea bargains"
"Cited sources for all three scenarios"
You’re 52% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.