This paper examines the relationship between politics and civil rights, arguing that political forces have historically shaped, enabled, and constrained civil rights protections. Drawing on foundational definitions of both politics and civil rights, the paper traces how racial politics dominated American civil rights discourse throughout the mid-twentieth century, spotlighting figures such as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. The paper concludes by reflecting on the enduring tensions created by individual self-interest and advocates for a more cooperative approach to resolving civil rights conflicts in society.
Politics is defined by Dictionary.com as "the often internally conflicting interrelationships among people in a society" (DI, 2005). Politics, then, in many cases, is the cause or the determining factor of civil rights.
Civil rights are those rights developed by citizens over time and sometimes protected by governments. Most notably — and those receiving the most national and international media attention — are the more generally based constitutional civil rights, "such as the right to vote, the right to personal freedom, the right to life, the right to freedom of movement, and anti-discrimination laws" (WI, 2005).
Throughout history, when individuals or groups have been found to be in violation of these civil rights, many civil rights movements have sprung up and become quite famous in American history. A prime example is the racial politics that shaped the American social climate in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, most notably under public figures like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X.
As Wikipedia notes, "Civil rights campaigns in the U.S. have been dominated by racial politics" (WI, 2005) for many years, and this pattern looks set to continue so long as issues of discrimination remain present in American society.
The matter of civil rights has always been, and will forever remain, a contentious issue — one marked by "internally conflicting interrelationships." This is most likely the result of individuals' internal self-interest, which is visible in all areas of society. Learning to work cooperatively, rather than continuing along a course of competitive individualism among all members of society, should be a goal that society as a whole works toward.
You’re 88% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.