This essay examines the concept of American exceptionalism—the idea that the United States is fundamentally different from other nations. Tracing its roots to the country's founding principles of equality, liberty, and inalienable rights, the paper explores the historical contradictions embedded in those ideals, including the exclusion of Native Americans, enslaved people, and women. It also discusses Americans' distinctive religious attitudes, the absence of a strong socialist tradition, the culture of meritocracy, and the unique system of checks and balances. Drawing on the work of Alexis de Tocqueville and Seymour Martin Lipset, the essay concludes that America is neither inherently better nor worse than other nations, but distinctly different.
When the American electorate re-elected George W. Bush as their president in November 2004, the rest of the world shook its head in collective amazement. They could not understand how someone the world "loved to hate," and who had, in their opinion, committed monumental blunders in his four years in office, could be chosen by so many Americans as their leader. They need not have been surprised, having been forewarned by thinkers such as Alexis de Tocqueville and Seymour Martin Lipset about the phenomenon called "American exceptionalism." Good or bad, America is different, and Americans often behave in vastly different ways from people living in the rest of the world. This essay highlights some of these differences.
The roots of American exceptionalism can be traced to the very origin of the country. The United States was founded on the principles of equality, the inalienable rights of man, and liberty—rather than on common ethnicity, culture, or language. Unfortunately, the professed basis of its nationhood was itself accompanied by double standards. The concepts of "equality," "liberty," and "inalienable rights" were exclusively reserved for white, property-owning males, with such basic rights completely bypassing Native Americans, enslaved Black people, and women for long periods of the nation's history.
This schizophrenic dichotomy in American history has continued to shape the nation's subsequent actions. While Americans have firmly believed in their Manifest Destiny and embarked on numerous crusades to bring democracy to the world and to fight tyranny wherever it exists, they also practiced ethnic cleansing of American Indians at home, tolerated Jim Crow laws that prevented African American suffrage in several U.S. states until the 1960s, and blatantly supported dictatorships around the world whenever it suited their interests ("From Sea to...").
"Religious attitudes shape American political priorities"
"Meritocracy enables opportunity but drives inequality"
"Unique political system prevents concentration of power"
America may not necessarily be better or worse than the rest of the world, but as rightly pointed out by Seymour Lipset, it is certainly different—a quality that helps explain both the best and the worst about the country.
You’re 48% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.