Porter's Generic Strategies Applied to the US Airways–American Airlines Merger
This paper examines Porter's three generic competitive strategies — cost leadership, differentiation, and focus — and applies them to the strategic decision by US Airways to merge with American Airlines. The paper argues that the merger most closely aligns with Porter's differentiation strategy, as the combined airline aimed to offer broader global networks, more route choices, and improved service. It also considers concerns raised by analysts about the risks of corporate arrogance and reduced agility that can accompany the formation of industry-dominant giants, and leaves open the question of which precise strategic path the newly enlarged American Airlines would ultimately pursue.
- Porter's Generic Strategies Defined: Overview of cost leadership, differentiation, and focus
- US Airways' Merger Strategy: US Airways merges with American Airlines for efficiency
- The Differentiation Argument: Merger positioned as differentiation through broader network
- Risks of Market Dominance: Analysts warn of arrogance and reduced agility
- Strategic Outlook for the New American Airlines: Final strategic direction remains undetermined
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its applied analysis in a clear, accessible explanation of Porter's three generic strategies before moving into the case study, giving readers the conceptual framework they need.
- It draws on multiple sources — an academic management framework and two contemporaneous journalistic analyses — to triangulate the strategic implications of the merger from different angles.
- The paper is intellectually honest: it acknowledges that the merger's ultimate strategic direction was still undetermined at the time of writing, rather than forcing a neat conclusion.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied theoretical analysis — taking an established business framework (Porter's Generic Strategies) and systematically testing which category best fits a real-world corporate decision. This technique requires both accurate exposition of the theory and careful, evidence-based reasoning about the case, which the paper executes through direct citation of industry commentary.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a concise framework section defining cost leadership, differentiation, and focus. It then introduces the US Airways–American Airlines merger and analyzes which of Porter's strategies best describes it. Two analytical paragraphs incorporate outside commentary on merger risks and strategic uncertainty. The paper closes by acknowledging the open question of which strategic path the new airline would follow, with differentiation identified as the most likely candidate.
Porter's Generic Strategies Defined
Porter's Generic Strategies relate to the strategies that different companies follow in order to remain profitable — for example, maintaining a position as a low-cost, no-frills airline, operating as a more costly carrier with premium comforts, or running a smaller company serving specific routes that others do not cover. Porter's three generic strategies are cost leadership, differentiation, and focus (IFM).
Cost leadership refers to when a company sets out to be the lowest-cost provider in its industry — in the airline context, the carrier leading all others in low fares. However it is achieved, whether through proprietary technology or exclusive access to the raw materials needed to operate commercial flights, a cost leader competes primarily on the basis of economic fares (IFM).
Differentiation means setting a company apart from competitors by offering certain attributes that others do not provide. An airline pursuing differentiation might, for example, offer sleeping facilities on long-haul overseas flights or include meals — amenities that have become rare in the industry. Focus, meanwhile, refers to a strategy of serving an exclusive or specialized niche market (IFM). Within focus there are two variants: cost focus, in which a company gains an advantage because its fares are, for instance, 12% below the average, and differentiation focus, which involves pursuing strategic differentiation within a concentrated target market (IFM).
US Airways' Merger Strategy
By merging with American Airlines, US Airways pursued a strategy described by analysts as one of "expedience rather than out of love" (Lawton, 2013). While the merger was driven at least in part by trade unions and the senior management of US Airways, it embraced an approach centered on improving the "operational efficiencies" of US Airways, as Thomas Lawton explained in U.S. News & World Report. Both companies involved in the merger were considered financially strong and "buoyant." The combining of their assets, Lawton noted, would give customers of the new American Airlines "a broader network, more choices, and better service" (Lawton, p. 2).
The merger created the world's largest airline by several measures, fundamentally reshaping the competitive landscape of the U.S. aviation industry. It was a consolidation move consistent with broader industry trends following the financial pressures airlines faced in the early 2000s, as carriers sought greater scale to achieve sustainable profitability.
The Differentiation Argument
Which of Porter's generic strategies best applies to US Airways' decision to join forces with American Airlines? The most likely answer is Porter's differentiation principle. Through the merger, travelers would have access to more routes on a global scale than any other airline could offer at the time. The combined network, broader range of destinations, and improved service proposition all point toward a differentiation strategy rather than a pure cost-leadership play.
That said, "cost management" and "operational efficiency" were undeniably among the benefits that both airlines anticipated from the merger. What remained challenging, as Lawton observed, was ensuring that the new airline could improve the customer value proposition — that is, whether customers would benefit either from lower costs or from a greater range of destination options (Lawton, p. 2).
Works Cited
IFM Management Technology Policy. (2010). Porter's Generic Competitive Strategies (ways of competing). Retrieved March 10, 2015, from http://www.ifm.eng.cam.uk.
Lawton, T. C. (2013). Why American Airlines and U.S. Airways tied the knot. U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved March 10, 2015, from http://www.usnews.com.
Le Clair, C. (2013). Business agility and the odds of a successful American Airlines and U.S. Airways merger. Forbes. Retrieved March 10, 2015, from http://www.forbes.com.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.