This paper examines the ethical considerations that arise when conducting exploratory research on post-tenure review in higher education. While such research lacks the physical risks associated with medical or scientific studies, it raises significant concerns related to privacy, confidentiality, and subject identification. The paper discusses the need to balance identifying information against the potential harm to professors' and students' careers, the importance of allowing anecdotal evidence to contextualize statistical findings, and the necessity of ensuring demographically balanced participation. Together, these concerns form a framework for conducting ethically sound post-tenure review research.
When conducting exploratory research upon human subjects, the researcher must always weigh the potential benefits of the research against the potential costs that might be incurred by the individuals under scrutiny. The proposed topic of post-tenure review research can yield valuable knowledge for professors, departments, and students alike. As institutions of higher learning are being forced to educate students with fewer financial resources, instituting procedures to identify the most effective faculty and improve pedagogical practices among tenured faculty becomes essential.
Such research does not present some of the ethical problems associated with medical or scientific experimental research: there are no physical risks to the subjects. However, privacy concerns are an important ethical issue that may affect professors, students, and administrators alike. First, the subjects in the study must not be obviously identified in ways that could impact the students' or professors' careers at their current institutions or later in life.
At the same time, some identifying information is necessary in order to evaluate the length of time a subject has spent at an institution, their department, professors' publishing records, and other factors that arise when conducting post-tenure review and evaluating teaching records. Researchers must therefore carefully navigate the tension between collecting meaningful data and protecting subject privacy.
"Role of qualitative input and demographic balance"
"Ensuring honest responses through confidentiality assurances"
You’re 49% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.