This paper investigates the relationship between quality and profitability, challenging the assumption that higher quality necessarily costs more. Through a survey of American technology companies (Google and Microsoft) and analysis of existing research, the paper demonstrates that quality improves profitability through effective resource management, employee retention, customer loyalty, and optimized working capital practices. The study finds that quality encompasses multiple business dimensions—from inventory management to employee recruitment—and that companies measure quality by their ability to manage resources effectively rather than by expenditure alone.
This paper examines the relationship between quality and profitability, challenging the common misconception that better quality necessarily costs more. Management of working capital is a critical aspect of business financial management due to its direct impact on business profitability. When a business manages working capital, it involves managing both existing assets and existing liabilities. Researchers in working capital management emphasize the importance of optimal inventory management and accounts receivable management. Regardless of perspective, most scholars agree that working capital management has a major impact on a business's profitability.
This paper presents the results of a survey asking several companies about their views on quality and the specific aspects of quality they measure and apply internally. The results suggest that companies adhere to established quality measures and confirm that quality leads to increased profitability. Research shows that higher costs are not a reliable measure of quality; rather, quality depends on how businesses manage resources and employees.
A survey was conducted targeting American businesses. Several companies were queried via email through their customer service sections, and asked a series of questions. Of the five companies contacted electronically, two responded: Google and Microsoft. The survey questions used a yes-or-no format to simplify response requirements.
The survey included the following questions:
The responses from Google and Microsoft were as follows:
Although the survey questions were simple and addressed various aspects of management, the focus centered on working capital management as a key indicator of the relationship between quality and profitability. During follow-up discussions, company representatives explained that some products operate on a demand basis, meaning limited inventory is maintained. Google, for example, noted that their apps are online, on-demand products and are not tangible. However, their recent products like Google Glass and Google Chromecast are tangible and pre-stocked. Microsoft similarly offers both tangible products (such as Xbox One consoles) and intangible offerings on both demand and pre-stocked bases.
This dual-product approach means both companies can utilize trade credit and accounts payable for various product categories. When discussed further, company representatives explained that quality service—particularly for Google—directly leads to higher profitability. Representatives stated that higher quality customer service increases customer loyalty, improves resource management, and optimizes working capital management. Quality extends to employee selection, as businesses require knowledgeable staff to manage product ordering and handling.
Quality improves profitability in multiple ways. Quality is not simply a matter of offering a higher-priced product; rather, it encompasses several business dimensions, including management practices, customer service, employee retention, and employee recruitment. As Blair-Loy, Wharton, and Goodstein note, employees provide the quality a business needs to create and sustain profitability. Their research shows that "the mission statements of firms recognized for their work-life initiatives were more likely than those of competitors to emphasize the value of employees and less likely to stress shareholder value" (Blair-Loy, Wharton & Goodstein, 2011, p. 427). This suggests that businesses recruiting high-quality employees and retaining them through comprehensive rewards packages gain competitive advantages in profitability.
Google exemplifies this approach with a comprehensive employee rewards program that emphasizes employee value. The company understands that quality employees require quality treatment and compensation to provide profitable outputs such as excellent customer service and innovative programming. Research also identifies resource allocation as a driver of profitability. As Cho and Pucik explain, "although innovativeness and quality may intuitively appear to impact positively on a firm's performance—including growth, profitability, and market value—in a similar fashion, pursuing these strategies may involve some hard choices in allocating resources" (Cho & Pucik, 2005, p. 555). A quality business manages resources effectively. Most successful companies recognize that without proper management of employee compensation, benefits, and other operational resources, productivity and profitability decline.
Cho and Pucik further explain that quality comprises a business's ability to balance profitability with innovativeness. "The innovativeness-quality-performance model describes how a firm's capability to balance innovativeness with quality drives growth and profitability, and in turn drives superior market value" (Cho & Pucik, 2005, p. 555). This means that businesses must implement innovative practices—such as enhanced employee reward programs—while maintaining practical decisions regarding product quality before purchasing and after production. These integrated decisions ultimately drive higher quality throughout the organization.
Structural equation models further illuminate the quality-profitability relationship. "Results of structural equation models indicate that innovativeness mediates the relationship between quality and growth, quality mediates the relationship between innovativeness and profitability, both innovativeness and quality have mediation effects on market value, and both growth and profitability have mediation effects on market value" (Cho & Pucik, 2005, p. 555). Profitability affects quality because financially healthy businesses can afford higher-quality employee recruitment, improved rewards programs, and superior products. Conversely, quality enhances profitability: quality employees generate customer loyalty, and quality products also generate loyalty. Customer loyalty is the most effective path to higher profits, and businesses can only achieve it through quality.
Gill, Biger, and Mathur explain that working capital management, measured by the cash conversion cycle, represents the time span between expenditure for raw material purchases and collection from finished goods sales. "A popular measure of working capital management is the cash conversion cycle, that is, the time span between the expenditure for the purchases of raw materials and the collection of sales of finished goods" (Gill, Biger & Mathur, 2010, p. 1). Working capital management encompasses the processes within a business—acquisition of raw materials, sales records, and purchase documentation. Businesses rarely operate without constant management of resources, processes, and operations. Quality products begin with quality raw materials acquired by knowledgeable employees. These quality products then generate increased sales and profitability. Management of such processes and resources drives higher quality throughout the company.
The survey assessed trade credit and inventory levels because Gill, Biger, and Mathur identify optimal working capital levels as value-maximizing factors. "Firms may have an optimal level of working capital that maximizes their value. Large inventory and generous trade credit policy may lead to high sales. The larger inventory also reduces the risk of a stock-out. Trade credit may stimulate sales because it allows a firm to access product quality before paying" (Gill, Biger & Mathur, 2010, p. 1). Trade credit enables businesses to evaluate products before commitment, ensuring excellent resource management and proper assessment of raw materials. Without trade credit, businesses cannot determine whether acquired materials and products are of high quality without risking capital and business assets.
How the results relate to existing research: The survey findings align with Gill et al.'s conclusions, demonstrating that effective management increases both quality and profitability. Company responses confirmed that inventory management, accounts payable timing, and similar working capital practices influence quality and profitability. This study contributes to the literature on working capital management and profitability in at least two ways. First, it focuses on American industrial businesses (Google and Microsoft are U.S.-based companies) where recent research remains incomplete. Second, the study corroborates previous authors' conclusions through testing the correlation between working capital management and profitability. The study therefore strengthens existing theory established by preceding research.
"Research gaps and future survey improvements"
Research limitations: The primary constraints are lack of company transparency and insufficient statistical information. Most firms contacted did not respond, limiting the dataset. Additionally, research on quality and profitability showed inconclusive results because no single measure definitively denotes quality's impact on profitability. Researchers view quality through various lenses and measures. The Gill et al. article discusses working capital management as a quality measure, while other articles define quality as resource management. Without a singular or widely accepted method of assessing quality, research yields limited information. Companies often refuse to divulge sufficient information for researchers to develop detailed surveys and studies. If businesses offered greater transparency and made statistics publicly available, researchers could produce more accurate and comprehensive results.
Future applications: The survey can improve business participation through enhanced relatability. The survey methodology allows for expanded information acquisition practices. Both the current survey and the Gill et al. approach offer growth opportunities related to business transparency and collaborative research.
Businesses clearly recognize the connection between quality and profitability. Companies like Google and Microsoft understand that quality directly associates with customer loyalty. Customer loyalty drives higher profitability. Furthermore, the research presented demonstrates that higher costs do not lead to high quality. Instead, businesses measure quality through their ability to manage resources effectively and conduct operations efficiently. If businesses provided increased transparency, research results would be more definitive and conclusive, providing clearer understanding of what quality in products and services truly means for a company's bottom line.
You’re 87% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.