Quinn's Incremental Change Theory Applied to Nursing
This paper examines how a nurse manager can successfully implement a change in shift-to-shift reporting—from the break room to the patient's bedside—by applying Quinn's incremental model of change alongside Advanced Change Theory (ACT). The paper critiques traditional change strategies, including empirical-rational, power-coercive, and normative-reeducative approaches, arguing that none adequately account for the complexity of human systems in healthcare settings. It then demonstrates how ACT's ten principles, combined with Quinn's preference for gradual, experimental commitment, enable even bureaucratically constrained nurse managers to foster genuine staff buy-in, self-reflection, and meaningful organizational improvement.
- Introduction: The Challenge of Change in Nursing: Nurse autonomy and resistance to procedural change
- Quinn's Incremental Model of Change: Gradual commitment preferred over sweeping strategies
- Limitations of Traditional Change Strategies: Rational, coercive, and consensus models fall short
- Advanced Change Theory and Leadership Self-Reflection: ACT principles require visionary, self-aware leadership
- Applying ACT Within a Bureaucratic Healthcare Structure: Bureaucratic leaders can still infuse purpose into change
- Framing Change to Build Genuine Staff Buy-In: Leaders must frame change around shared organizational values
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds a specific, practical nursing problem—relocating shift reporting from the break room to the bedside—in two well-developed theoretical frameworks, showing how abstract models translate into real managerial action.
- The paper systematically critiques competing change strategies (empirical-rational, power-coercive, normative-reeducative) before advocating for its preferred approach, which strengthens the argument through contrast.
- It acknowledges the genuine constraints nurse managers face (bureaucratic hierarchy, limited personal authority) and explains why ACT remains useful even within those constraints, making the argument realistic rather than idealistic.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective comparative critique: it introduces multiple established frameworks side by side, identifies the specific weakness of each in the healthcare context, and then synthesizes the preferred model as a solution. This technique shows theoretical depth and avoids presenting a single source uncritically.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by defining the change problem and introducing Quinn's incremental model. It then surveys and critiques traditional change strategies before pivoting to Advanced Change Theory and its ten principles. The argument narrows progressively from broad organizational theory to the specific role of the nurse manager, concluding with practical guidance on framing change for staff. Each paragraph builds directly on the one before it, creating a tightly integrated argument across roughly five body paragraphs plus a reference list.
Introduction: The Challenge of Change in Nursing
Change resistance can often be extremely difficult to overcome in a healthcare environment. Given that nurses operate with a great deal of autonomy, they are often suspicious when new initiatives interfere with standard operating procedures that have worked in the past. To change the locality of shift-to-shift reporting from the break room to the bedside, a nurse manager must generate staff buy-in so that employees genuinely believe that the change is needed and will make substantive improvements for patients — enough so that any inconveniences generated by the change seem warranted.
Quinn's Incremental Model of Change
Rather than demanding immediate and radical changes, James Brian Quinn's logical incrementalism "suggests that the most effective strategies of major enterprises tend to emerge step-by-step from an iterative process in which the organization probes the future, experiments, and learns from a series of partial (incremental) commitments rather than through global formulations of total strategies" (Barnat, 2014). Quinn argues that incremental change is preferred because it results in improved quality of information dissemination, better organizational awareness, decreased uncertainty, and thus improved psychological commitment.
Limitations of Traditional Change Strategies
The model of change theory embraced by the organization must be founded in the principles of Advanced Change Theory (ACT) and must depart from traditional theories of change. The old empirical-rational strategy stresses that if people are presented with the logical benefits of change, they will alter their behaviors (Pochron, 2008, p. 125). While this is an important component of change, rationalism alone will not generate buy-in. People can become very emotionally attached to old ways, and there may be personal dynamics within an institution that cause resistance to the leader driving that change.
The power-coercive strategy suggests that a series of carrots and sticks created by leadership will generate needed changes (Pochron, 2008, p. 126). Unfortunately, in a healthcare environment, this is often the worst method of generating change, given that nurses will feel dictated to and as if their expertise is being ignored. Even the normative-reeducative strategy — which "assumes people are rationally minded and need to be engaged in the process of change" and depends upon consensus-building — is problematic according to the ACT model, because it does not focus sufficiently on the leader as well as the follower (Pochron, 2008, p. 125). The leader must engage in an intensely self-reflective process about how he or she brings about change and must be willing to learn from the needs of his or her followers.
References
Barnat, R. (2014). Quinn's incremental model. Strategic Management. Retrieved from http://www.strategy-implementation.24xls.com/en116
Pochron, R. S. (2008). Advance Change Theory revisited: An article critique. Integral Review, 4(2), 125–132. Retrieved from http://integral-review.org/documents/Pochron,%20Article%20Review,%20Vol.%204%20No.%202.pdf
Sherman, R. (2011). Why is change so hard? Emerging RN Leader. Retrieved from http://www.emergingrnleader.com/why-is-change-so-hard/
What is bureaucratic leadership? (2015). Study.com. Retrieved from
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.