Race and the Criminal Justice System: The New Jim Crow
This paper examines the role of institutionalized racism in the American criminal justice system, arguing that the disproportionate incarceration of African Americans and Latinos reflects a cultural legacy rooted in Manifest Destiny and reinforced through successive eras of racial oppression. Drawing on scholars such as Michelle Alexander, Angela Davis, and Becky Pettit and Bruce Western, the paper traces how racially biased drug laws, unequal access to legal representation, jury bias, and the prison industrial complex collectively function as a modern form of racial subjugation — what Alexander terms the "New Jim Crow." The paper also addresses the cyclical nature of poverty, limited opportunity, and incarceration that keeps minority communities trapped in systemic disadvantage.
- Introduction: Racial bias and incarceration in U.S. history
- The Root of the Problem: Systemic racism, drug war, and plea deal injustice
- Targeting African Americans: Prison growth, community devastation, and racial targeting
- Drug Laws and the Cycle of Incarceration: Drug law hypocrisy and minority imprisonment cycles
- Conclusion: Cultural change needed to end racial caste system
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds its argument in a clear historical arc — from Manifest Destiny through Jim Crow to the present — giving the thesis strong contextual depth.
- Integrates multiple academic sources (Alexander, Davis, Pettit and Western, Aguirre and Baker) to substantiate each sub-claim, lending the argument credibility.
- Uses specific statistics (e.g., 12% of Black men in their twenties incarcerated by 2002; 31% of police killing victims being Black) to make abstract claims concrete and measurable.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of a structural argument: rather than treating racism in criminal justice as individual prejudice, it positions the entire system — drug laws, plea bargaining, jury composition, and the prison industrial complex — as interlocking mechanisms of racial control. This systems-level framing, anchored by Alexander's "New Jim Crow" thesis, is a strong model for building a sociological argument that moves beyond anecdote to structural analysis.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a statistical and historical introduction establishing the thesis. The second section diagnoses the systemic root causes (racial bias, War on Drugs, plea deals, jury bias). The third section narrows to specific targeting mechanisms and community impact. The fourth section focuses on drug laws as a vehicle for racial incarceration, including the crack cocaine sentencing disparity. The conclusion calls for cultural change and quotes Alexander's call for cross-racial solidarity.
Introduction
Race has always been a cultural factor in the United States, and it is certainly a factor in today's criminal justice system. James (2018:30) has shown that current "research on police officers has found that they tend to associate African Americans with threat." A significantly higher percentage of the African American population is incarcerated than any other population in the U.S. And, as Lopez (2018) points out, "Black people accounted for 31 percent of police killing victims in 2012, even though they made up just 13 percent of the US population." The evidence indicates that African Americans receive a disproportionate amount of attention from police and are disproportionately punished and incarcerated because of institutionalized racism within the American ruling class.
This racist worldview was evident from the early days of the nation, when the concept of Manifest Destiny was put forward by John O'Sullivan (1845). That concept expressed the belief that White Anglo-Saxon Protestants were essentially God's chosen people and thus had a right — that is, it was their manifest destiny — to rule others, take their land, and dominate them. This worldview became so ingrained in American culture that it gave rise to Jim Crow laws, such as the "separate but equal" clause upheld in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), entrenching segregation and further oppression. The Civil Rights Movement drew attention to the plight of African Americans, but today there is evidence of a New Jim Crow responsible for the ongoing association of race with incarceration (Alexander 2012).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.