Jeremy Rifkin's European Dream vs. the American Dream
This paper reviews Jeremy Rifkin's 2004 book The European Dream, in which Rifkin argues that the traditional American Dream — centered on individual material advancement and wealth accumulation — has become outdated and is being superseded by a European model that prioritizes community, cultural diversity, sustainable development, and universal human rights. The review summarizes Rifkin's key statistical and economic arguments, including comparisons of GDP, life expectancy, and healthcare access, while also critically noting the book's limitations, particularly Rifkin's overly optimistic framing and selective treatment of Europe's historical record, including its legacy of imperialism.
- Introduction: Two Dreams, Two Visions: Introduces Rifkin's thesis replacing the American Dream
- Rifkin's Core Argument for the European Dream: Rifkin defends Europe's productivity, wages, and lifestyle
- Economic and Quality-of-Life Comparisons: EU GDP, healthcare, and life expectancy versus the U.S.
- Unfinished Business: Immigration and the EU Constitution: Rifkin acknowledges gaps before the Dream is fully realized
- Critical Assessment of Rifkin's Thesis: Review identifies utopian flaws and propagandistic tendencies
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper opens with a clear framing of the central contrast — the American Dream versus the European Dream — before introducing Rifkin's thesis, orienting the reader immediately.
- It balances exposition with critique: it fairly represents Rifkin's statistical evidence before identifying the book's weaknesses, demonstrating analytical balance.
- The conclusion avoids over-enthusiasm, acknowledging Rifkin's arguments while labeling his vision "utopian," which shows independent critical judgment.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the technique of critical book review, using direct quotation from the source text to anchor summary claims, then stepping back to evaluate the author's logic and evidence. Rather than simply restating Rifkin's argument, the reviewer tests it against counter-evidence (e.g., Europe's imperialist history) and points out where optimism overrides rigorous analysis.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a classic review structure: introduction of the book's central thesis, exposition of the author's supporting arguments (economic data, lifestyle comparisons), acknowledgment of the author's own caveats (immigration, unfinished EU integration), and a concluding critical evaluation that identifies the book's propagandistic tendencies. This arc moves logically from "what Rifkin claims" to "how well those claims hold up."
Introduction: Two Dreams, Two Visions
We are all familiar with the proverbial American Dream. Whether it exists or whether it is truly attainable are questions best left aside for the moment, because another proverbial dream has emerged that demands our attention. According to Jeremy Rifkin, the idea of the American Dream is not only outdated — it is also being quickly replaced by the European Dream. "While the American Spirit is tiring and languishing in the past," Rifkin writes, "a new European Dream is being born."
In his book The European Dream, Rifkin lays down the thesis that America has lost its charm, its appeal, and almost everything it once symbolized. The new American generation is, in his view, overweight, under-educated, and unnecessarily aggressive, with little or no regard for broader social welfare. The American Dream, which once revolved around tapping into opportunities, buying a home, and amassing consumer goods, now sounds "far too centered on personal material advancement and too little concerned with the broader human welfare to be relevant in a world of increasing risk, diversity and interdependence."
For this reason, the American Dream needs a better replacement, and according to Rifkin, it has arrived in the form of the European Dream, which "emphasizes community relationships over individual autonomy, cultural diversity over assimilation, quality of life over the accumulation of wealth, sustainable development over unlimited material growth, deep play over unrelenting toil, universal human rights and the rights of nature over property rights, and global co-operation over the unilateral exercise of power."
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.