This essay argues in favor of Americans' right to own handguns, grounding the argument in the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. It examines the historical rationale for the right to bear arms as a safeguard against government tyranny, addresses the deterrent effect of legal gun ownership on criminal activity, and responds to common objections raised by gun-control advocates. The paper also considers high-profile public shootings as a case for allowing law-abiding citizens to carry firearms for self-defense. The essay concludes that handgun ownership is a core expression of personal liberty and that concerns about misuse are better addressed through stronger enforcement of existing laws and permitting requirements.
This study guide is drawn from PaperDue's library of 130,000+ paper examples across 47 subjects.
As laid out in the Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution, Americans have the right to own guns. The Second Amendment was essential to the formation of a free and democratic state, and it remains a fundamental right for all Americans.
When the Second Amendment was drafted, it promised Americans the right to bear arms as a protection against a repressive government. Early Americans feared the situation so many of them had fled: a powerful, dictatorial government that was armed, inflicting its will on an unarmed and therefore helpless populace. By guaranteeing the right to bear arms, Americans were assured that their new government would lack the power to bully or coerce them.
These concerns are alive and well today, with many Americans fearing an overly powerful government. Individuals who are allowed to own a handgun are protected from abuse by corrupt government officials. This is a fundamental right according to the Constitution.
Perhaps even more than the government, Americans have cause to fear crime. If handguns are outlawed, the saying goes, only outlaws will have handguns. That is, making it illegal to own guns only applies to law-abiding citizens. Criminals have no respect for the law by definition, and they will find guns on the black market. The result would be a society with armed criminals and unarmed targets.
Allowing responsible citizens to own handguns enables them to defend themselves against violent crime and robbery. Criminals are aware of the legality of personal gun ownership and may therefore tread more carefully when approaching a potential victim. Without knowing for certain who has exercised the right to own a gun, criminals are likely to assume everyone is armed. Through deterrence, the legality of owning a handgun effectively reduces crime overall.
"Rebuts claim that more guns increase violence"
"Armed bystanders could prevent mass shooting casualties"
Many arguments exist for the ongoing acceptance of the personal freedoms guaranteed to Americans through the Bill of Rights. Owning handguns is an expression of personal liberty, and helps people defend themselves against a tyrannical government, a corrupt official, a criminal, or a mass shooter. This is an essential right for citizens in a democratic society, and those who fear irresponsible gun behavior should channel their concern into increasing enforcement of existing laws and permitting requirements.
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.