This paper evaluates the effectiveness and efficiency of sex offender rehabilitation programs, focusing on how such programs aim to reintegrate offenders into society while protecting the public. It outlines the two primary program types — education and treatment — and explains Minnesota's three-tier offender classification system. Drawing on a National Police Agency survey of 740 released sex offenders, the paper highlights a 14% recidivism rate and a 54% rate of re-offense occurring within the first year, arguing that current program goals are not being met and that more rigorous psychological evaluation is needed before offenders are returned to society.
A sex offender rehabilitation program is developed to rehabilitate those who have committed crimes considered by the law as sexual deviancy ("Sex Offender Rehabilitation," n.d.). The types of rehabilitation programs vary according to the state in which the program is established. However, the programs generally cater to sex offenders who are released back into society after serving their sentences. There are different levels, phases, and approaches to these sex crime programs, and the specifics depend on the area of research. All programs, however, take a cognitive approach in hopes of rehabilitating the offender.
These programs are designed to ensure that the public is kept safe after the release of sex offenders. The goal is not only to improve how incarcerated individuals are handled within correctional facilities and to protect the public during their absence from society, but also to help ensure that when offenders return to the community, they will not cause further harm to others ("Sex Offender Rehabilitation," n.d.).
In Minnesota, sex offenders are classified under three levels defined by prisoner panels ("Sex Offender Program," n.d.). These levels are as follows:
Level 1 — Very low chance of re-offense. The offender's information is kept private and shared only with law enforcement.
Level 2 — Significantly higher chance of re-offense. Information is shared not only with law enforcement but also with care centers and schools.
Level 3 — Very high chance of re-offense. This level involves community notification, typically carried out through a public meeting ("Sex Offender Program," n.d.).
This classification system is designed primarily for public awareness, informing communities about the potential dangers that they and their loved ones may face. Sex offender registries and community notification systems serve a different purpose from sex crime treatment programs, which are aimed directly at the offender and use cognitive approaches to alter behavior and decrease the likelihood of re-offense.
There are two primary types of programs available for sex offenders: an education program and a treatment program ("Sex Offender Rehabilitation," n.d.). The education program offers offenders strategies for dealing with their cognitive problems; it covers topics such as healthy sexuality and methods for controlling anger and stress. The treatment program takes a more therapeutic approach, tailored specifically to the individual and delivered within a community environment.
A recent study indicates that sex crime programs remain significantly flawed. According to a survey conducted by the National Police Agency, there is a 14% chance of repeat crimes overall, with 54% of re-offenses recorded within one year of release ("Sex Offender Survey," 2010). The study observed a total of 740 sex offenders released from prison between June 2005 and May 2010. Overall, 14% of all offenders were found to have repeated their crime, and of that percentage, 57 individuals had done so within one year of their discharge ("Sex Offender Survey," 2010).
These findings demonstrate that significant problems remain within sex crime programs and that further research is needed. How to properly engage with a sex offender and how to release them back into society with reasonable confidence that they will not reoffend must be studied more carefully. The current program objectives — which are supposedly designed to reduce potential deviant behavior, provide motivation and psychological education, evaluate psychological condition, encourage responsibility for offenses, and address other issues related to the re-release of sex offenders — are not being fully achieved, as evidenced by continued rates of re-offense ("Sex Offender Rehabilitation," n.d.).
"Call for stronger psychological evaluation before release"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.