Sexual Objectification of Women in Music Videos and Performance
This paper examines the sexual objectification of women in contemporary music, analyzing how female performers across Western pop and K-Pop simultaneously subvert and reinforce traditional patterns of objectification. Drawing on Laura Mulvey's concept of the "male gaze," Judith Butler's gender theory, and Rosalind Gill's post-feminist framework, the paper argues that while artists such as Miley Cyrus, Beyoncé, and CL adopt sexually assertive personas to claim power, they remain caught within the very objectifying structures they seek to challenge. The paper also considers the broader cultural implications of this tension, tracing parallels to Weimar-era cinema and debating whether post-feminist sexual expressiveness represents genuine empowerment or a repackaged form of commodification.
- Introduction: Objectification Amplified: Historical escalation of women's sexual objectification in music
- Post-Feminism and the Male Gaze: Cyrus, Butler, and phallocentric pop representation
- The Paradox of Sexual Agency: K-Pop girl groups as empowered yet commodified paradox
- Women's Identity and the Power of Sexuality: Generational clash between feminism and post-feminist sexuality
- From Patriarchal to Matriarchal Sexuality: CL, Fritz Lang, and the femme-fatale as power figure
- Conclusion: Objectification in the Modern Era: Unresolved debate over objectification's harm or empowerment
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds its argument in well-established theoretical frameworks — Mulvey's male gaze, Butler's gender performativity, and Gill's post-feminist sensibility — giving the cultural analysis intellectual credibility.
- It uses concrete, timely examples (the Cyrus/Thicke MTV VMA performance, CL's "Hello Bitches" video) to illustrate abstract theoretical claims, keeping the argument accessible and grounded.
- It acknowledges genuine complexity: rather than condemning or celebrating post-feminist sexuality outright, it presents the tension as an unresolved paradox, reflecting intellectual honesty.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the technique of multi-framework synthesis, applying several distinct theoretical lenses — film studies (Mulvey), feminist philosophy (Butler), and cultural studies (Gill) — to a single cultural phenomenon. This layered approach allows the author to reveal contradictions within post-feminist pop culture that no single theory could capture alone.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a broad claim about historical escalation of objectification, then narrows to specific case studies (Cyrus, CL, K-Pop girl groups). It moves through theoretical framing, then broadens again to cultural and generational conflict, drawing a historical analogy to Fritz Lang's Metropolis before closing with a deliberately open-ended conclusion that mirrors the unresolved nature of the debate.
Introduction: Objectification Amplified
When compared to the female singers of the early twentieth century, women in music today represent a far more blatant example of sexual objectification. This is not to suggest that, three-quarters of a century ago, women were not also objectified; it is simply to acknowledge that objectification has been amplified to such a degree that women in music are eroticized in their music videos — across virtually all cultures, East and West — as the videos in K-Pop, J-Pop, and Western pop all indicate. Women performers from CL to Miley Cyrus to Beyoncé all contribute to this sexual objectification by flaunting their sexuality and utilizing it in a post-feminist manner: acting as the sexual aggressor rather than the sexually passive receiver of the "male gaze," as Laura Mulvey called it in her deconstruction of the sexual objectification of women in cinema. However, as other researchers have noted, in adopting a post-feminist manner of sexual exuberance and assertiveness, women singers have not escaped the constraints of objectification — they both reinforce that objectification and attempt to redefine their sexuality through a more assertive, flaunting style of female expression.
Award-winning journalist Ginny Dougary commented on this theme in her op-ed piece for The Times in 2007, noting that the underlying issue is the "pornografication of mainstream culture." This is supported by the fact that "serious" women — such as Nicole Kidman or Maggie Gyllenhaal — who have significant screen presence often appear nude for their roles, an act that reinforces the idea that women are mere objects. The popularity of female music videos on streaming sites like YouTube further reinforces the notion that women in music are utilizing their sex-symbol status and power to build massive followings on social media, which in turn translate into revenue streams for the corporations that sign them to extensive contracts. They promote their tours, and women come onto the stage in little more than bathing suits, some flaunting their bodies in sexually explicit ways that audiences are sometimes astonished by. The performance of Miley Cyrus with Robin Thicke at the MTV Video Music Awards in 2013 was a perfect example of the female singer's dual role as sexual aggressor and sexual object: Thicke was dressed in a tuxedo, while Cyrus came out in nude underwear and sneakers and "twerked" on Thicke as he ogled her body.
Post-Feminism and the Male Gaze
Ironically, what happened after the Thicke/Cyrus performance only served to complicate the issue: Cyrus was hailed for her depiction of rebellion — the idea that "sexual liberation" can make one great (Jones 2). Thicke, on the other hand, saw his marriage fall apart and was viewed scornfully as a "womanizer" (Holson). The irony is that without Thicke on stage taking part in the spectacle, there would have been no "male gaze" under which Cyrus could display her body. Women singers in music today are thus situated in a bind: they want to break free from the concept that they are mere sex symbols — yet at the same time they want to capitalize on the sexual power they hold over the male gaze, reversing their role in that discourse from being objects to being the objectifiers. The problem, as Michael Unger points out, is that it does not work.
According to Judith Butler, representations such as those of Cyrus — or any of the other popular and openly sexual female singers today — perpetuate the depiction of women from a "phallocentric" point of view (Butler 30). Even when such depictions are more sexually assertive (such as CL's performance in her music video "Hello Bitches"), placing the woman's desire to dominate at the front and center of the erotic message, the male gaze remains the ultimate arbiter. Rosalind Gill maintains that what defines the post-feminist model is a shift from objectification to subjectification — that is, the woman is no longer the object of the male gaze; rather, the male is the subject of the female's desire to dominate sexually (Gill 147). Yet the eroticism that women in music offer their audiences overtly reconfirms them as objects of the male gaze, even as these women display a dominant tone of sexuality.
The Paradox of Sexual Agency
As Michael Unger notes, "the K-pop girl group music video is a paradox of (re)presentation" — the performers are celebrated and empowered, yet at the same time they are "objectified and reduced to a commodity of idealized beauty" (Unger 25). This K-Pop paradox mirrors a broader tension running through contemporary pop music culture globally: the simultaneous celebration and reduction of the female performer.
The problem with this paradox is that it creates a source of conflict in how women identify themselves. Old-school feminists like Dougary prefer to think of women as something more than sex objects, viewing feminism as a means of escaping that typology. Yet today they observe that the younger generation is increasingly fascinated and emboldened by the explicitly sexual and eroticized women in music — whether the Pussycat Dolls or solo artists like Rihanna, Britney Spears, or Miley Cyrus. These young women view being a sex object or sex symbol as a means of gaining power and authority. It is a far more sensual basis for power than the early feminists ever imagined, whose basis for power was intellectual, grounded in rights and the ability to perform jobs as well as men. Today's younger generation persists with a post-feminist concept that exalts their sexuality even as it reduces them to mere objects — much as it did in the past.
Conclusion: Objectification in the Modern Era
The objectification of women continues in music today, in both stage performances and music videos. The only question is whether this is good or bad for women. As Michael Unger notes, this is not an easy question to answer, because the notions of good and bad have been made so subjective in the modern era that what is perceived as harmful by some is viewed as empowering by others. In the case of women in music, objectifying themselves for the sake of wielding power over men has been heralded — as in the case of Miley Cyrus — but, of course, it has not been universally heralded.
Works Cited
Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge, 1990. Print.
Dougary, Ginny. "Yes, We are Borrowed." The Times, 2007. Web. 13 Apr. 2016.
Gill, Rosalind. "Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility." European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 10, no. 2 (2007): 147–166.
Holson, Laura. "A Blurred Lines Boomerang: Miley Cyrus and Robin Thicke See a Reversal of Fortunes." The New York Times, 2014. Web. 13 Apr. 2016.
Jones, E. Michael. Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine's Press, 2000. Print.
Lang, Fritz, dir. Metropolis. UFA/Paramount, 1928. Film.
Mulvey, Laura. "Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema." Screen, vol. 16, no. 3 (Autumn 1975): 6–18.
Unger, Michael. "The Aporia of Presentation: Deconstructing the Genre of K-pop Girl Group Music Videos in South Korea." Journal of Popular Music Studies, vol. 27, no. 1 (2010): 25–47.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.