SFBT vs. Narrative Therapy: Key Differences Explained
This paper examines two influential counseling therapy models: Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) and Narrative Therapy. It traces SFBT's origins with Steve de Shazer and Insoo Kim Berg, outlining its future-oriented, goal-driven philosophy and signature techniques such as the miracle question. The paper then introduces Narrative Therapy as developed by Michael White and David Epston, explaining how storytelling, externalization, and dominant cultural narratives shape client identity. The final section draws clear distinctions between the two approaches—contrasting their use of past versus present, their handling of problem externalization, and their orientations toward unique outcomes versus definite solutions—to help practitioners understand when each model is most appropriate.
- Introduction to Counseling Therapy Theories: Brief framing of the two therapy models
- Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT): Overview and Origins: Origins, founders, and future-focused philosophy of SFBT
- Core Beliefs and Techniques of SFBT: Miracle question, fundamental beliefs, and client strengths
- Narrative Therapy: Overview and Key Concepts: Narrative identity, externalization, and dominant cultural stories
- Fundamental Differences Between SFBT and Narrative Therapy: Five key contrasts between the two counseling models
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper clearly introduces each theory before comparing them, giving the reader a solid conceptual foundation before encountering the contrast section.
- It uses precise theoretical vocabulary—terms like "externalization," "dominant narrative," and "miracle question"—accurately and consistently throughout.
- The compare-and-contrast section is well-organized, pairing each SFBT characteristic directly against its Narrative Therapy counterpart, making differences immediately legible.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates structured comparative analysis: each theoretical model is first treated independently with its own origins, mechanisms, and assumptions, and then the two are placed side by side in a dedicated section. This two-stage structure (define, then compare) is a reliable method for academic papers that must evaluate multiple frameworks without conflating them.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief framing introduction, then devotes two sections to SFBT—one covering origins and general approach, another detailing core beliefs and techniques including the miracle question. A single section covers Narrative Therapy's foundations, externalization process, and cultural dimensions. The final and longest section systematically contrasts the two models across five distinct dimensions: orientation to the past, use of documentation, problem externalization, unique outcomes, and response to success versus failure. References follow in APA-adjacent format.
Introduction to Counseling Therapy Theories
Two influential models in modern counseling practice are Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) and Narrative Therapy. Although both are grounded in constructionist thinking and emphasize the client's own resources, they differ considerably in how they approach the past, present, and future. Understanding their core assumptions and techniques helps practitioners select the most appropriate model for a given client and situation.
Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT): Overview and Origins
Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) is a type of counseling approach — sometimes called "talking therapy" — grounded in social constructionist philosophy. Rather than focusing on the problem that brought a client to seek help, SFBT centers on the client's goals and preferred future. It does not dwell on past events but directs attention primarily toward what lies ahead.
SFBT is also referred to as solution-focused or solution-building therapy. It was initiated and developed by Steve de Shazer (1940–2005) in collaboration with Insoo Kim Berg (1934–2007) and their colleagues from the late 1970s onward in Wisconsin. The approach is future-focused, concentrating on goals and solutions rather than on problems (Institute for Solution-Focused Therapy, 2011).
Under this model, it is the counselor's role to invite the client to imagine their preferred condition and future. This enables the therapist to identify the growth signals the client offers — whether small or large steps — and to build upon them, guiding the client toward more positive thinking and perspective. The therapist continually asks clients about their strengths, the resources available to them, and the specific exceptions to the problem that can be used to the client's advantage.
SFBT therapists believe that change must be achievable and actively sought. When therapists help clients identify the changes they want in their lives — and direct attention to current events they wish to see continue — counselors essentially help these individuals build a solid vision for themselves (Stephen M.L., 2011). Once the therapist has helped the client identify the present circumstances they wish to sustain, the therapist then helps the client see how their present situation can lead to the future they desire.
The therapist supports clients in moving closer to their preferred future by bringing small successes to their awareness and encouraging them to repeat those successful behaviors more frequently, especially during times when the problem is less prominent (The Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2011).
In summary, SFBT is a counseling approach that focuses on two central tasks: supporting clients in exploring their preferred future, and discovering where, how, when, and with whom elements of that preferred future are already occurring.
Core Beliefs and Techniques of SFBT
A distinctive technique within SFBT is the use of carefully constructed questions that help the client imagine their future and how it will differ once current challenges are resolved. These questions simultaneously help the counselor establish goals and objectives for the client. The most well-known of these is commonly called the miracle question. This question requires considerable skill to deliver effectively, and the client must be given ample time to think through and articulate their range of possible answers.
The fundamental beliefs underlying SFBT can be summarized as follows:
Change is always possible and is continuously occurring in our environment. Individuals possess the resources and strength to resolve the challenges they face. The counselor's role is to help the client identify changes that are already happening and to help reinforce them. Most challenges do not require extensive gathering of historical information in order to be resolved. To solve a problem, one does not need to know its cause. Small changes that are easily overlooked ultimately contribute to larger change. Clients are, by and large, the best people to address their own challenges. Solutions can emerge quickly, and there are always multiple ways and perspectives from which to view any given situation (Cynthia Good Mojab, 2006).
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.