Literature Review Undergraduate 2,280 words

Solution-Focused Brief Therapy: History, Practice & Application

~12 min read 6 sections Therapy · Solution Focused Therapy

Abstract

This paper provides a literature review of solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT), a strengths-based, evidence-backed model developed in the 1980s by Steve de Shazer and Insoo Kim Berg. The review covers the theory's history, its future-oriented and goal-directed approach, the role of therapeutic language in shifting clients from a problem focus to a solution focus, and the specific applications of SFBT in family therapy contexts. A brief clinical vignette illustrates a three-stage treatment framework for a couple dealing with depression and relationship strain. The paper also addresses relevant interventions at each stage of treatment and considers complicating factors such as co-occurring mental health conditions that may limit SFBT's efficacy.

Key Takeaways

Introduction: Overview of SFBT topics covered in the review
History and Summary of SFBT: Origins, founders, and core SFBT concepts
The Role of Language and Question Framing in SFBT: How intake questions shape therapeutic outcomes
Vignette and Clinical Analysis: Couple case study illustrating three-stage SFBT
Staged Interventions and Treatment Considerations: Specific interventions and complicating clinical factors
Conclusion: Simplicity and skill in SFBT practice

✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾

What makes this paper effective

The paper integrates a clinical vignette that directly illustrates the SFBT model's three-stage treatment framework, grounding abstract theory in a concrete family scenario.
It draws on multiple peer-reviewed sources to support each major claim, from the historical development of SFBT to the microanalysis of question tone in therapy sessions.
The paper explicitly contrasts SFBT with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), which sharpens the reader's understanding of what is distinctive about the solution-focused approach.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates the integration of theoretical literature with applied clinical reasoning. Rather than simply summarizing sources, it uses them to support a structured argument about how SFBT works in practice — moving from historical background through theoretical principles to a concrete case analysis and staged intervention plan.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with a brief orienting introduction, then moves into a historical and conceptual overview of SFBT. A section on language and question framing transitions into the vignette and clinical analysis, which forms the core applied section. The analysis expands into a discussion of staged interventions, complicating factors such as co-occurring disorders, and the importance of question progression. A brief conclusion wraps up the argument by emphasizing the need for a skilled facilitator.

📘 Read the full literature review guide → Generate citations → Build an outline → Draft a literature review → 📚 More Solution Focused Therapy examples →

Essay 2,280 words

Introduction

This paper offers a brief literature review of what has come to be known as solution-focused therapy. The review addresses several specific topics within the solution-focused therapy paradigm: the history of the theory, the use of language to help create a solution-focused therapeutic environment, the role of family history in solution-focused therapy, the shift from a problems focus to a solutions focus in a way that benefits the client, a short clinical vignette based on a family situation, global goals of the treatment method expressed in the language of the theory, interventions appropriate at each stage of treatment (beginning, middle, and end), and a summary of all of the above. There are certainly other methodologies that can be used when treating a patient in a therapeutic environment; however, solution-focused therapy has well-established proponents and can be used effectively when harnessed by the right facilitator in the right way.

History and Summary of SFBT

Solution-focused therapy is also commonly known as solution-focused brief therapy, and the two terms are interchangeable. Solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) is an "evidence-based, collaborative, strengths-based model developed in the 1980s by Steve de Shazer and Insoo Kim Berg and is now in use as an organizing treatment approach all over the world" (Trepper, 2012). One of the primary uses of SFBT is in a family therapy setting (Trepper, 2012). De Shazer himself is regarded as a pioneer in the broader field of family therapy and is often bestowed the title "Grand Old Man of Family Therapy." The terms "iconoclast" and "creative genius" are frequently attributed to his work, which is often described as a "minimalist" philosophy when it comes to how his therapy strategies address family dynamics and other aspects of everyday life. He wrote five books on solution-focused brief therapy and related topics. SFBT itself evolved from a related approach known as Brief Family Therapy, as described by de Shazer in 1982 (Trepper, Dolan, McCollum, & Nelson, 2006).

Solution-focused brief therapy is a future-focused methodology that is heavily goal-directed. The overall pattern in the therapy is to identify exceptions and solutions. Exceptions are instances when an identified problem occurs less frequently, or could occur less frequently. Solutions are descriptions of what life would look like if the problem were resolved. As therapy progresses, "scales" are used to help determine how far towards a resolution the therapy has helped those involved progress. While family therapy is often the main focus of SFBT, the approach can also be applied to couples therapy, treatment of sexual abuse, substance abuse treatment, sex therapy, treatment of schizophrenia, and more. Books have even been written to help individuals self-treat or work within a group affected by the problems rather than relying on an outside facilitator. However, this paper focuses primarily on family therapy, as that is the principal application of SFBT and the focus of this literature review (Trepper, Dolan, McCollum, & Nelson, 2006).

The history of a family is critically important when SFBT is used to address family issues. It is that family history that has created and reinforced the negative patterns the therapist or facilitator seeks to break. The family members actively interacting within a given family obviously need to be involved for therapy to achieve its full effect. However, a subset of members — or even a single individual experiencing family problems — can benefit from SFBT, as they can identify their own solutions even if one or more family members cannot or will not participate. A cornerstone of family-oriented SFBT is that even when the problems and the people involved are complex and intricate, the solutions need not be robust or expansive. A very simple answer may be sufficient to help a therapy recipient manage a problem occurring within their family. Even simple solutions can be difficult to sustain and implement effectively; however, this does not change the fact that the solution itself may not be difficult to define (Trepper, Dolan, McCollum, & Nelson, 2006).

The Role of Language and Question Framing in SFBT

One of the important dimensions of any therapy is the focus of the questions used during intake. Questions used at the start of treatment can be framed around solutions or around problems, and SFBT is no exception. An identification and exploration of the presenting problems must take place so that solutions can be identified. However, the tone and tenor of those questions can significantly influence how the therapy progresses (Richmond, Jordan, Bischof, & Sauer, 2014). There have been many studies — sometimes involving microanalysis — of the positive and negative dynamics that flow through the questions asked and answered in a therapy session, whether in SFBT or another modality. The key is to begin at a somewhat negative starting point and shift progressively toward a more positive, solution-based approach as therapy advances.

The tone of therapy will naturally begin in a fairly difficult or negative place for the person seeking help, and this is to be expected — otherwise, the person probably would not be seeking therapy in the first place. However, it is important that there be visible progress toward solutions so that the identified problems can be addressed through the interventions revealed and discussed. These principles may seem straightforward, but other therapeutic approaches differ considerably. For example, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is often more negative in the nature of its questions. As one might expect, negative questions tend to elicit negative answers, just as positive questions tend to elicit more positive responses. This explains why SFBT may begin with negative questions and answers but involves an intentional and methodical progression on the part of the facilitator — guiding the therapy recipient from the negative feelings and conditions they are experiencing toward solutions and an improved outlook (Jordan, Froerer, & Bavelas, 2013).

2 Sections Hidden · 870 words

Vignette and Clinical Analysis560 words

Therapist: So — if you could state it shortly and simply, what problem are you facing that you would like assistance with?

Staged Interventions and Treatment Considerations310 words

To frame this analysis in theory-based language: both partners perceive the problem, but only the husband is sufficiently focused on a solution to take action. If the wife observes the solution — not merely hopes for…

View Full Document

Conclusion

The relative simplicity of the solution-focused approach should not be mistaken for a shortcut to resolving the problems clients face. It requires a skilled facilitator who understands when to move on to the next step and why. Nevertheless, the solution-focused approach is clearly superior in terms of the mood and pattern it projects when compared with more intensive therapeutic modalities. There may be times and situations that call for more rigorous methods, but keeping the process focused and straightforward can also be highly effective.

References

Carr, S. M., Smith, I. C., & Simm, R. (2014). Solution-focused brief therapy from the perspective of clients with long-term physical health conditions. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 19(4), 384–391. doi:10.1080/13548506.2013.824594

Cotton, J. (2010). Question utilization in solution-focused brief therapy: A recursive frame analysis of Insoo Kim Berg's solution talk. Qualitative Report, 15(1), 18–36.

Daki, J., & Savage, R. S. (2010). Solution-focused brief therapy: Impacts on academic and emotional difficulties. Journal of Educational Research, 103(5), 309–326.

Franklin, C. (2015, May). An update on strengths-based, solution-focused brief therapy. Health & Social Work, 73–76.

Jordan, S. S., Froerer, A. S., & Bavelas, J. B. (2013). Microanalysis of positive and negative content in solution-focused brief therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy expert sessions. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 32(3), 46–59. doi:10.1521/jsyt.2013.32.3.46

Richmond, C. J., Jordan, S. S., Bischof, G. H., & Sauer, E. M. (2014). Effects of solution-focused vs. problem-focused intake questions on pre-treatment change. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 33(1), 33–47. doi:10.1521/jsyt.2014.33.1.33

Taylor, L., & Simon, J. (2014). Opportunities: Organizing the solution-focused interview. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 33(4), 62–78. doi:10.1521/jsyt.2014.33.4.62

Trepper, T. S. (2012). Solution-focused brief therapy with families. Asia Pacific Journal of Counselling & Psychotherapy, 3(2), 137–148. doi:10.1080/21507686.2012.718285

Trepper, T. S., Dolan, Y., McCollum, E. E., & Nelson, T. (2006). Steve de Shazer and the future of solution-focused therapy. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 32(2), 133–139.

Key Concepts in This Paper

Solution-Focused Therapy Brief Therapy Steve de Shazer Family Therapy Goal-Directed Approach Therapeutic Language Staged Interventions Exception Finding Problem vs. Solution Focus Clinical Vignette